It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
thoiter
reply to post by andy06shake
Sorry to be pedantic, but it's not the oldest star in the (known) universe, it's the oldest (known) star in the (known) universe.
A team of astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has taken an important step closer to finding the birth certificate of a star that’s been around for a very long time.
"We have found that this is the oldest known star with a well-determined age," said Howard Bond of Pennsylvania State University in University Park, Pa., and the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Md.
The star could be as old as 14.5 billion years (plus or minus 0.8 billion years), which at first glance would make it older than the universe's calculated age of about 13.8 billion years, an obvious dilemma.
But earlier estimates from observations dating back to 2000 placed the star as old as 16 billion years. And this age range presented a potential dilemma for cosmologists. "Maybe the cosmology is wrong, stellar physics is wrong, or the star's distance is wrong," Bond said. "So we set out to refine the distance."
The new Hubble age estimates reduce the range of measurement uncertainty, so that the star's age overlaps with the universe's age — as independently determined by the rate of expansion of space, an analysis of the microwave background from the big bang, and measurements of radioactive decay.
This "Methuselah star," cataloged as HD 140283, has been known about for more than a century because of its fast motion across the sky. The high rate of motion is evidence that the star is simply a visitor to our stellar neighborhood. Its orbit carries it down through the plane of our galaxy from the ancient halo of stars that encircle the Milky Way, and will eventually slingshot back to the galactic halo.
This conclusion was bolstered by the 1950s astronomers who were able to measure a deficiency of heavier elements in the star as compared to other stars in our galactic neighborhood. The halo stars are among the first inhabitants of our galaxy and collectively represent an older population from the stars, like our sun, that formed later in the disk. This means that the star formed at a very early time before the universe was largely "polluted" with heavier elements forged inside stars through nucleosynthesis. (The Methuselah star has an anemic 1/250th as much of the heavy element content of our sun and other stars in our solar neighborhood.)
abeverage
Oldest star in the known Universe a close neighbor?
Otherwise known as KOLOB...
soficrow
reply to post by 1n3MANarmy
Now I'm confused. Is SMSS J031300.362670839.3 a star, or the remains of a star, now a black hole?
abeverage
abeverage
Oldest star in the known Universe a close neighbor?
Otherwise known as KOLOB...
Read carefully as the Earth was supposed to have been formed over a period of 6,000 years and this oldest star is 6,000 light years away. I find coincidences like that interesting to say the least. Perhaps that is where the Prometheans live and the 6,000 years is how far away they traveled when they started life on Earth...
The age of stars
To understand the age of stars, we have to understand how they are formed, and how they evolve, and while a star is much simpler than a bumblebee, accounting for the complexities of physics, the uncertainties in the conditions in the early Universe, and may other factors, precise dating is fraught with difficulties.
This latest discovery, of SMSS J031300.36-670839.3, may be the oldest star we know in the universe, but given the uncertainties involved, maybe it isn't.
In fact, the Nature paper announcing this new star goes into exquisite detail on how the observations were made and how the abundance of chemicals was measured, and then argues conclusively that the material from which the star was made must have existed in the very early Universe. But it's highly important to note that the one thing the authors do not comment on is the actual age of the star.
As for the name, I'll suggest "Wr'Alda" which is often translated as "The Ancient One" from the Oera Linda Book. An alternative to the Judaeo Christian only terms. :-)
AugustusMasonicus
Korg Trinity
If it were possible to age all the known stars in the universe.... which I might add it isn't... We could trace the location of the big bang event.
The Big Bang did not happen in one place, it occurred everywhere simultaneously. The Big Bang was not matter exploding into empty space, the big bang was space itself expanding along with matter.
Bedlam
Korg Trinity
This doesn't make any sense!!
When you look at the universe the greater the distance you look the further back in time you look...
This is true with respect to what you're seeing in a telescope. It doesn't mean the youngest stars are closest to us. That wouldn't make sense, if you think about it a while.
Korg Trinity
If it were possible to age all the known stars in the universe.... which I might add it isn't... We could trace the location of the big bang event.
Snarl
Korg Trinity
If it were possible to age all the known stars in the universe.... which I might add it isn't... We could trace the location of the big bang event.
The Big Bang created everything ... including space. That's why you'll hear evidence of the Big Bang is everywhere, hence no specific location for its occurrence.
Not my theory, just repeating what I learned.
Bedlam
reply to post by Korg Trinity
It expanded everywhere at once. There are no edges.
abeverage
abeverage
Oldest star in the known Universe a close neighbor?
Otherwise known as KOLOB...
Read carefully as the Earth was supposed to have been formed over a period of 6,000 years and this oldest star is 6,000 light years away. I find coincidences like that interesting to say the least. Perhaps that is where the Prometheans live and the 6,000 years is how far away they traveled when they started life on Earth...
Korg Trinity
Bedlam
reply to post by Korg Trinity
It expanded everywhere at once. There are no edges.
Yes it expanded everywhere at once and still is... from a point of origin......
And if you think the universe has no edges you maybe right... but infinite or not... it did have a point of origin.... and thus that point is within our known universe....
Korg Trinity
.... after a few billion years the sphere expanded to it's current size.
Korg.