It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BeLowUIdontevenknowu
look at the population of muslims in europe and in switzerland.
Muslims Expansionism is on the rise again, another war must be fought to put them back where they belong.
I declare the 3rd Crusade!
Richard the Lionheart and French King Philip Augustus
Originally posted by Seekerof
Richard the Lionheart and French King Philip Augustus
Just a tick off beat here, but I wonder how many know that Richard and Phillip were 'lovers'?
seekerof
Originally posted by Otts
Um... Philip was Richard's lover?
He did have three wives, you know...
Although he never succeeded in "getting it up" with his second wife, Ingeburge of Denmark. It was an ugly divorce.
This is the Latin text, from Stubbs edition as given in Boswell CSTH 231.
"Ricardus dux Aquitaniae, filus regis Angliae, morum fecit cum Philipo
rege Franciae, quem ipse in tantum honoravit per longum tempus quod singulis
diebus in una mensa ad unum cantinum manducabant, et in noctibus non
seperabat eos lectus. Et diliexit eum rex Franciae quasi animam suam; et
in tantum se mutuo diligebant, quod propter vehmentem delictionem quae
inter illos erat, dominus rex Angliae nimio stupore arreptus
admirabatur quid hoc esset."
Boswell translates this, accurately I think,
"Richard, [then] duke of Aquitaine, the son of the king of England,
remained with Philip, the King of France, who so honored him for so
long that they ate every day at the same table and from the same dish,
and at night their beds did not separate them. And the king of farnce
loved him as his own soul; and they loved each other so much that
the king of England was absolutely astonished and the passionate love
between them and marveled at it".
Riley does this with the passage.
"...and the King of France held him in such high esteem that every day
they ate at the same table and from the same dish, and at night had not
separate chambers. In consequence of this strong attachment which seemed to have arisen between them, the King of England was struck with
great astonishment, and wondered what it could mean..."
Originally posted by Otts
Just a sidenote to mods and supermods... do we have a "Conspiracies in History" forum? If we don't, that would be a GREAT addition to ATS!
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by edsinger
Well both religions are comming to a climax at some point. I guess we will see which one was right all along then....
Well, they've both been saying that for about 2,000 years now, so lets not worry about that.
frosty
First the Jews are kicked out of Ur,
I think it was Uruk no? Anyway, abraham was a native to that city, and the 'jews' didn't exist. They weren't kicked out. Abraham left with only his family. So if anything it shows the interrelatedness of the two groups.
then the Greek and Persian Empires go to war,
The persians are an entirely different people from teh sumerians and the greeks have nothing to do with the christians or jews in this 'christian v muslim' dichotomy
then comes the Roman empire,
Whats that got to do with this?
then it's the Moor invasion,
The muslims also expanded into north africa and conquered the visigothic kingdoms that were there. Conquering the visigothic kingdom in spain was really just par for the course.
then the Crusades, then its colonization, then comes 9/11, and now comes the Muslim invasion by immigration. What is next for a war that has been on going for the last several thousand years?
There simply hasn't been an ongoing war between 'europeans' and 'muslims' for thousands of years. Trying to reach back to times before the existence of islam and even christianity doesn't really make any sense, those other struggles had their own partiuclar reasons. The arabs fought the byzantines becase the byzantines were fighting the arabs and vice versa. Ultimately the Turks swept in from their non muslim central asian homeland and settled that anyway. The Greco-Persian struggles were largely over ionia and the athenian interference with persian rule there. Also, after alexander conquered Persia, he 'medeized', he adapted to their ways and adopted many of their customs, and intergrated himself into persian culture, while at the same time spreading hellenistic culture throughout the east. Even in teh early muslim period there were christian communities in Iraq, Syria, Iran, india, etc. There isn't anything especially long term (in terms of projecting into the past) about the current struggle between the liberal democratic west and a backwards fundamentalist theocratic east. People in general struggle with one another. If you are looking for a constant, thats it.
Originally posted by Ottsedsinger and I agree on something??
Stop the presses!!!
Originally posted by Frosty
Looks like the middle east if I ever saw it.
Not Sure if this includes any of the middle east
It's also safe to know that Vienna came under attack by Muslim invaders during the 1600's.
a war amongst two different people, the west and middle east. And it has been ongoing for quite some time. It's not as if the Muslims suddenly lept up and started attacking the west.