Originally posted by American Mad Man
...It seems that the JSF can do the same job as the F-117 at a lower cost and providing more versatillity.
I think you have to consider the
roles. The F-117 is a "first day of war" strike AC for todays battlespace, and we learned a lot from it. It has no A2A role, but it's good for SEAD
TODAY. It's value is that it can give us firsthand BDA's on critical targets. We launch CM's at less important targets, or to soften up EAD
for the F-117's.
JSF/F-22 will replace our current hi-low mix. i.e. F-16/F-18 and F-15's. First day strikes will increasingly be dependent on unmanned systems. It's
the new CM's and UCAV's that will replace the stinkbugs. They will have loitering and AAR capabilities. The new CM's will even be able to RTB. When
we need positive BDA's, we'll put in UCAV's. If we
really, really need eyes, we'll field JSF's with Raptors giving cover, or a B-2/Raptor
combo after we've peeled back the first layer of EAD.
The JSF will be the last manned F/A platform we build. It'll be UCAV's from here out. So, no, the JSF will not really replace the F-117, UCAV's and
new CM's will. The F-117 is just an interim solution. In another 10-15 years, they will all be sitting in the museums
What you should really be asking is, will the Raptor eliminate the need for the Growler?
[edit on 23-11-2004 by engineer]