It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ElohimJD
There's no way to use the 'child' metaphor without being on some level rather insulting.
I could say that "only a child would believe fairy stories about a invisible friend in the sky that helps them out."
See how that just stings, even when I mean nothing by it, per se? Even when I put it in quotes to show that I'm only providing an example and not actually calling believers children?
The quote provided is calling all mankind children, not secular mankind children, while believers something better.
In God's eyes, according to His word in scripture, all mankind during this present age (worldly) are "children" spiritually. We are equal, whether believer or not. This present age is not the age for the salvation (maturing) of Mankind; that time is in the age to follow.
God Bless,
racasan
reply to post by frazzle
For the most part agree with what you have here but my point that “the majority of American people were opposed to any attack on Syria” still stands and so does my question to the op about his groupthink idea
International conflicts are not one sided, there are many players and powers involved...and so ''groupthink'' can be challenged by those with opposing views. However, an internal situation can be tightly monitored. It is possible for one sided media to project A particular kind of view as being THE ''correct'' one, while mocking and dismissing another. It works on the same principle as conditioning the masses that brand X is better than brand Y.
@racasan
.... ....Syria and they failed so how do you account for that in your groupthink scenario?
As a Muslim, absolutely nothing prevents me from recognizing values such as ''old fashioned'' marriages and families and morality in Christian societies... The reason because we uphold the same in ours. Anyway, the point of this thread was to look into how christian America had its traditional values rewritten by nameless faceless entities. I.e- means unknown, unelected powers destroyed the values that America once had So when asked to pinpoint those who brought about these major changes in norms, it has been conclusively demonstrated that no one here has a decent solid answer. (somebody actually suggested hippies as being the root cause. You can take that as seriously as you want to, I think it is a pathetic and laughable explanation.)
I am wondering how a Muslim who doesn’t even live in the country would even care if America becomes more secular
What advantage do you think you will get with a more Christian America?
Or
What disadvantage do you think you will get with a more secular America?
racasan
reply to post by frazzle
Again I am in agreement with you, so you also don’t go along with the op’s view that there is an all encompassing group trying to make Americans less religious?
And I have seen a lot of people make similar comments on things as you have put here all over the internet – that must imply the divisive thing is not working so well anymore
I said there is a power behind these changes and I asked ''who or what'' it is. Meaning, that question was left open for discussion. I did not say ''this group in particular are behind these chanes''.
@ Gryphon66... You're making the claim!
You haven't just asked the membership for an answer to a question you have repeatedly and relentlessly referred to the "group behind" this supposed media campaign you consistently in post after post refer to.
I have, thats what the whole Op was about. And a lot of people contibuted on the same line of thought. Thats what the thread was intended to be about all along.
No one is talking about whether the media can affect opinions .
Last October, a woman in Qassim, considered Saudi Arabia’s most conservative region, lashed out at a member of the religious police who demanded that she cover her entire face (she was wearing a veil that left her eyes exposed). “Don’t provoke me!” the woman retorted. “Do you think we don’t know our own religion? We know our religion, and covered up before you even existed. The full facial cover is not forced upon a woman!” A 42-second video of her response blew up on Saudi social media. Using the hashtag #Don’tProvoke, people tweeted messages of support, criticizing the officer for berating a modestly dressed woman, and for doing so in front of her children. The public outpouring was a rarity in a country where, when it comes to confrontations between men and women, it is generally accepted that women are to blame.
sk0rpi0n
Values and societal norms don't change unless someone first intended a change. It can happen either on the part of the people themselves OR those with the ability to shape the perceptions of the people. People did NOT start waking up and go about rewriting norms that they upheld for several generations. ________________________________________The acceptance of formerly shunned behaviours/ideas was the result of skilled manipulation and re-education, designed to alter society's perceptions on certain issues. Its on the same principle that ad campaigns and war propagnda works, except its 100 times more efficient. Part of this re-education is the idea that these changes are ''progressive''. A lot of times civil rights flavored language is used to promote these issues. You see it all the time whenever some celebrity speaks about it. So when a person accepts these changes, he does so thinking its ''progressive'' for the only reason it was suggested to him that it was ''progressive''. ________________________________________Yes, accepting these changes don't happen overnight. The erosion of religion combined with the non-stop media bombardment pushing the agenda creates the right conditions for people to accept these changes. Opposing voices are quickly silenced or ridiculed or misrepresented.
Gryphon66
I realize that makes a big difference to a certain mindset, EJD, but all that "semantic hand waving" doesn't do anything for folks who think like I do. See, as hard as it may be to believe, I just don't buy any of it. So to a certain mindset, when that kind of rhetoric is applied, we shut down.
If the goal is communication, that stuff needs to wait on the table.
The hippies were at best a subculture of its time... Like punks and metalheads. Under ''creative control'' of nobody but absolutely powerless to rewrite societal norms. The real power to control mainstream media and influence society lies elsewhere. But the entertainment industry seems to be responding to what people are in to. If the people behave stupidly, they give them stupid shows for entertainment. If people love whorish behaviour, they give them whorish singers and celebrities. But the love of stupidity and whorishness themselves was caused by the removal of decency and traditional values, that religion brought to the table.
@ racasan.... Actually the hippy thing is probably right – my whole life I have one way or another been involved with for want of a better term content providers – musicians/artists/film makers all-sorts – each and everyone of them ordinary people with something to say and the internet has given them the equivalent of a radio or TV station with which they can communicate with everybody else on the internet so that’s probably 3 or 4 billion people by now
And none of these people are under the control of anybody but their own conscience and all of them sick of the way things are
I've proved a murder has taken place and I'm asking ''who's behind it''... Because I'd like to know myself. Which is why I asked in OP ''who or what'' that entity is. My words in OP are on record..and I'm not interested in these pointless back and forths where I am asked to answer my own questions.
Gryphon66.... and you can't offer any proof of the entity that's accomplishing this massive feat.
sk0rpi0n
I've proved a murder has taken place and I'm asking ''who's behind it''... Because I'd like to know myself. Which is why I asked in OP ''who or what'' that entity is. My words in OP are on record..and I'm not interested in these pointless back and forths where I am asked to answer my own questions.
Gryphon66.... and you can't offer any proof of the entity that's accomplishing this massive feat.