It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Flu Shot Reduces Risk of Autism

page: 2
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 12 2014 @ 01:07 AM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 

No. I said it was a survey. A survey about which we know nothing. A survey with no data provided. A survey about ....nothing.


edit on 2/12/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 12 2014 @ 01:12 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 



n spite of a gross distortion of the results of that study

ah we are quoting different posts
edit on 12-2-2014 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

edit on 12-2-2014 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2014 @ 01:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 

Ok. I did not say there was anything wrong with that study. I say that Heidi Whosis was blabbing about something she obviously had no idea she was talking about. It was not the study, it was her distortion of it.



posted on Feb, 12 2014 @ 01:22 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


no problem Phage
as to the post you are refering to here you go from the article:

The RKI is a federal institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health. One of the mandates of the institute is to gain scientific insights which are the used as a basis for decisions in the health sector.

german government
www.kiggs-studie.de...
edit on 12-2-2014 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

edit on 12-2-2014 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

edit on 12-2-2014 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

edit on 12-2-2014 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2014 @ 01:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 

Thank you. So, is this the study they were talking about?
Findings of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)

The lifetime prevalence of diseases preventable by vaccination was markedly higher in unvaccinated than in vaccinated subjects.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

Interesting. Says vaccinations work. Now what?

edit on 2/12/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2014 @ 01:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


from your link Phage:


Unvaccinated children aged 1–5 years had a median number of 3.3 (2.1–4.6) infectious diseases in the past year, compared to 4.2 (4.1–4.4) in vaccinated children. Among 11- to 17-year-olds, the corresponding figures were 1.9 (1.0–2.8) (unvaccinated) versus 2.2 (2.1–2.3) (vaccinated).

while you are correct in that quote which I did miss which is referring to LIFETIME PREVALENCE, the numbers for the last year all look higher for the vaccinated children...


edit on 12-2-2014 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

edit on 12-2-2014 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2014 @ 01:56 AM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 

You expect vaccinations to have an effect on diseases they aren't meant to affect?


Unvaccinated children aged 1–5 years had a median number of 3.3 (2.1–4.6) infectious diseases in the past year, compared to 4.2 (4.1–4.4) in vaccinated children.



The proportion of children and adolescents who had had pertussis, measles, mumps, and/or rubella was much higher in unvaccinated children than in those who had been vaccinated against the respective disease to a sufficient extent.


Vaccinations work against the diseases they are meant to work against.

But you can keep believing the distortions of your sources if you want to.
edit on 2/12/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2014 @ 02:15 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 



In spite of any attempt to rule out misclassifications we cannot entirely exclude the possibility that some children without a vaccination card were vaccinated without adequate documentation. A systematic question regarding this issue will therefore be included in future KiGGS studies.

Study data regarding diseases may also depend on people’s ability to remember and on the assessment of those surveyed as well as on a medical diagnosis. We therefore cannot completely rule out that the true prevalence may be over- or underestimated.


looks like I picked a crappy reference lol

a couple months in the bush and man am i out of practice


edit on 12-2-2014 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2014 @ 02:18 AM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 




looks like I picked a crappy reference lol

Looks like you should go to the original sources from the get go.
Good on you, mate!



posted on Feb, 15 2014 @ 06:16 PM
link   

Danbones
reply to post by Phage
 



In spite of any attempt to rule out misclassifications we cannot entirely exclude the possibility that some children without a vaccination card were vaccinated without adequate documentation. A systematic question regarding this issue will therefore be included in future KiGGS studies.

Study data regarding diseases may also depend on people’s ability to remember and on the assessment of those surveyed as well as on a medical diagnosis. We therefore cannot completely rule out that the true prevalence may be over- or underestimated.


looks like I picked a crappy reference lol

a couple months in the bush and man am i out of practice


edit on 12-2-2014 by Danbones because: (no reason given)


We make crappy mistakes.
However, thank you for your contribution.



posted on Feb, 15 2014 @ 06:19 PM
link   

Phage
reply to post by Danbones
 




looks like I picked a crappy reference lol

Looks like you should go to the original sources from the get go.
Good on you, mate!


Thank you Phage.
It is not enough to say what an asset you are to the ATS community.



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join