It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I cannot see how people can look at all the activity on Mars and think, even for a second, that there is NOT life on Mars.
Aleister
From the "epic" Mars anomalies thread, funbox posted this image from a source he was pointed to on the previous page.
funbox's post:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 11-2-2014 by Aleister because: (no reason given)
Phage
reply to post by JayinAR
I cannot see how people can look at all the activity on Mars and think, even for a second, that there is NOT life on Mars.
Yes. It's real easy to think it. A bit trickier to verify it.
What instruments would you like to see on the rovers? Got some design plans on how to detect...something...remotely on another planet?
Especially when the brainiacs don't have the foresight to put the proper instruments on the rovers TO verify it.
Haven't see any indications of life being discussed. Have you? But do you think someone is getting wealthy off of this scheme?
"We are gonna send up these bad ass rovers and find ALL SORTS of indications of life for you guys, but if you want PROOF you'll have to give us money for another rover."
Phage
reply to post by JayinAR
What instruments would you like to see on the rovers? Got some design plans on how to detect...something...remotely on another planet?
Especially when the brainiacs don't have the foresight to put the proper instruments on the rovers TO verify it.
Haven't see any indications of life being discussed. Have you? But do you think someone is getting wealthy off of this scheme?
"We are gonna send up these bad ass rovers and find ALL SORTS of indications of life for you guys, but if you want PROOF you'll have to give us money for another rover."
edit on 2/11/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Phage
What instruments would you like to see on the rovers? Got some design plans on how to detect...something...remotely on another planet?
Blue Shift
Could be water. Could be those darned blueberries getting periodically darker for some odd reason.
Yeah. If you want to see a particular thing, if you're lucky and pick the right spot. But there are things that look like microbes and aren't, just like there are rocks that look like...things.
Like here on Earth, if we want to see microbial life, we use freakin' MICROSCOPE!
Because these compounds are essential to life as we know it, their relative abundances will be an essential piece of information for evaluating whether Mars could have supported life in the past or present.
Life requires more than water.
The chemistry approach is fine, they came to conclusion that Mars could have had all the necessary chemical compounds to support life even though they already knew there was liquid water sometime in the past on the surface of Mars, so NASA has only verified what they already knew, so to speak.
Actually the suspected water flows are not near the north pole. The north pole is too cold for there be liquid water, ever. The flows are at lower latitudes and on cliffsides. Very dangerous locations for landers. I'm sure they would have liked to have landed there if it were at all reasonable to do so.
Not only that, if they suspected that melting H2O flows today when spring starts in regions close to Martian North Pole, why didn't they send MSL where suspected H2O is, with microscope among the other instruments?
Not necessarily. But that is not the mission. One step at a time...
Aftel all, we need to see organisms if they exist and not only confirmed with chemistry experiments, don't you agree?
Aleister
reply to post by JadeStar
The tracks where the water/sand/shadows fall are already set in the side of the crater, so if these were shadows they wouldn't all fall in those tracks. And on the right of the gif, where the water/sand/shadows are longer, there is really no object above which makes a shadow. These were taken quite some time apart. I think NASA even acknowledged this as one of the areas which were possibly briny water, and the speculation also included sand, but would sand fall all at once over such a wide area? A good gif to explore these possibilities (funbox grabbed this gif from another source, but he could have made this one and made it stand on its head and bark if he had a mind to, he's one of ATS's proficient pic artists).
JadeStar
Boscov
reply to post by Phage
All good points. In this case, repositioning would serve the hypothesis well, irregardless of logistics.
The word you want is regardless. Irregardless isn't really a word.
Usage Discussion of IRREGARDLESS
Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however.
Life requires more than water.
JadeStar
Old regurgitated story from December.... not surprised it took Fox News that long to pick up on it, they're a bit slow on the uptake....