It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Hillary Papers

page: 2
12
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 01:05 PM
link   

neo96

On May 12, 1992, Stan Greenberg and Celinda Lake, top pollsters for Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign, issued a confidential memo. The memo’s subject was “Research on Hillary Clinton.”


freebeacon.com...



'Narcissitic loony toom'
is how hillary decribes Lewinsky.



ALL THOSE WHINEY WOMEN




Hillary Clinton’s blunt assessments were not confined to Monica Lewinsky. In a Dec. 3, 1993, diary entry, Blair recounted a conversation with the first lady about “Packwood”—a reference to then-Sen. Bob Packwood, an influential Republican on health care embroiled in a sexual harassment scandal.


Sorry what did Hillary need a congressman on healthcare for ?

Being the 'First lady' and all that jazz.


YOU ARE ENTERING A WORLD OF PAIN



Days after President Clinton’s impeachment in 1998, the first lady called Blair in good spirits, telling her friend that, “Most people in this town have no pain threshold.”



“HC says press has big egos and no brains,” wrote Blair on May 19,


Yeah Hillary they do considering who runs the current government right now.

Your epic failure on Benghazi.

And the Press sweeping anything 'negative' under the rug.

This is an interesting read.

For those who care.

I tell ya Republicans better get their snip together or she will be Potus.

That is bad news people.
edit on 10-2-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)


I see you have completed your FOX training course.

She would have needed a congressman to help promote healthcare to the rest of congress. Unless you support a dictator that just does as they please.

The First lady has NO political authority she cannot pass any kind of law. You should have learned this in grade school.

She hasn't even announced her intention to run for president so why do you keep saying she is running like it's fact? If she were to run it would it be as bad as the warmongers and big business tools like Romney that the Republicans keep trying to push on America?




posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 01:11 PM
link   


I tell ya Republicans better get their snip together or she will be Potus.
reply to post by neo96
 


I'm sorry, but to think we/they/any of us holds the power to elect ANYONE to office has an archaic way of thinking.

They future president has already been decided, and the only thing that remains is to convince people that he/she was OUR choice, and elected by 'our' vote.



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 01:12 PM
link   

neo96


“HC says press has big egos and no brains,” wrote Blair on May 19,




Indeed, just because someone is ruthless and power hungry to occupy
the White House that alone does not make them qualified to hold the office.



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 01:14 PM
link   
reply to post by buster2010
 





I see you have completed your FOX training course.


As opposed to the political trolling course ?

FreeBeacon



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 01:14 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


You have to wonder why a country would even consider the woman for POTUS being married to another POTUS who was impeached.

Doesn't say much for the state the country is in when this is all there is to run for president and they say she is a shoe-in.

WOW is this really all the U.S. has to offer...how embarrassing.



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 01:20 PM
link   

burntheships

neo96


“HC says press has big egos and no brains,” wrote Blair on May 19,




Indeed, just because someone is ruthless and power hungry to occupy
the White House that alone does not make them qualified to hold the office.




“HC says press has big egos and no brains,” wrote Blair on May 19,



Anyone could say the same about CLinton.


edit on 10-2-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 01:29 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 




True, she is her own worst enemy once again,
and she really did not do well with the press last time.


Looks like Washington Times has picked this up.
www.washingtontimes.com...




posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 01:31 PM
link   

Battleline
...
WOW is this really all the U.S. has to offer...how embarrassing.


And J. Bush's name keeps getting mentioned on the GOP side.

I will burn an American flag at the polling station if it is a Bush vs Clinton ticket in 2016.



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 01:32 PM
link   
reply to post by burntheships
 


You know what ?

Hillary stayed with BIll for decades for no other reason, but for her political career.

That says tons about her.

She has a severe lack of character.



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 01:40 PM
link   
reply to post by jrod
 


I don't know about burning a flag but it may be time to take a look at another place to live.



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 02:11 PM
link   

neo96
reply to post by burntheships
 


Hillary stayed with BIll for decades for no other reason, but for her political career.



Yes, I know many women feel "sorry" for her,
yet how pathetic is that as a political strategy.

Even after he was impeached, Bill Clinton
and his buddy Ron Burkle; and his private
jet called rhymes with Air Suck One.
www.vanityfair.com...





edit on 10-2-2014 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 02:25 PM
link   

jimmyx
reply to post by hounddoghowlie
 


yup, I can't wait for her to ascend to the throne....make way for the queen!...geez, a black man and then next a woman as president?...republicans will lose their collective minds...reminds me of what happened during that old movie "scanners"...GOP heads exploding all around the country from rage.


so you want Hillary to be POTUS because it will piss of your political opponents? Did you really just admit to that?

And that, my friends, is what is wrong in our country.

I am not sure if i should give you credit for honesty, or chide you for mendacity. Regardless, your viewpoint scares me worse than if you would just drink the Kool Aid and declare that the DNC is here to save us.



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 02:27 PM
link   
reply to post by buster2010
 


The first lady cannot pass laws.

Meanwhile, school children across the nation are starving to death after lunch.

Hmmm......



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 02:45 PM
link   
I fear a lot of women will vote for her, as many of my friends like her without even knowing why. They can't give me a list of her known accomplishments. They get angry at me for challenging them.

I would love to have a woman as president IF she is qualified and a good choice. Hillary is neither.



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 03:14 PM
link   
reply to post by burntheships
 


Now, now, now ... What difference, at this point, does it make?!




posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 03:15 PM
link   

texasgirl
I fear a lot of women will vote for her, as many of my friends like her without even knowing why. They can't give me a list of her known accomplishments. They get angry at me for challenging them.

I would love to have a woman as president IF she is qualified and a good choice. Hillary is neither.


Hey, I wanted to see a black man in office IF he was qualified and a good choice, too, and apparently those things just don't matter.



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 03:22 PM
link   
Geez.

I can hear the pundits now.

Them evil right wingers don't like Clinton cause shes a woman.

IF they stay true to form, and they always do.
edit on 10-2-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 03:26 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


Not to rain on your hate parade or anything, but could you explain how Hillary is different from any other politician seeking the Presidency? You know besides the obvious (she has ovaries).

It seems like every other day I read about how Hillary is going to doom us all and run this country into the ground then I get a bunch of quotes from her time as First Lady or as a New York Senator. But these things attributed to Hillary, just as many men are guilty of the SAME EXACT THINGS yet we look at them like it is business as usual. Sure we may call them out on it from time to time, but in the end they end up reelected anyways (so calling them out on it is worthless and just makes them feel uncomfortable for a little while).

I'm not trying to say that Hillary is the next best thing since sliced bread, but MAN you guys are giving the Democrats A LOT of ammo to keep their "accuse the opposition of being intolerant to shut them up" game afloat. Except in this case they just use the word misogynist instead of racist.

Somehow I think that the Republicans are going to hand the Presidency to the Democrats (again) in 2016 thanks to stuff like the OP.
edit on 10-2-2014 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 03:34 PM
link   
@ Krazyshot,

I would politely disagree that the info in the OP is irrelevant at this point.

Why? Because Hillary left her position of Secretary of State in a Scandal
that she was responsible for. Benghazi.

Everything in the OP shows us what led
her to seek power in office. I dont care
what sex she is, it is irrelevant to the fact
that she was derelict in her duties.

And why should anyone be given special
consideration for political office because of
their sex?



posted on Feb, 10 2014 @ 03:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Krazysh0t
 





Not to rain on your hate parade or anything, but could you explain how Hillary is different from any other politician seeking the Presidency? You know besides the obvious (she has ovaries).


Thanks for proving the above comment.

That didn't take too long.


edit on 10-2-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join