It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Look, I'm sure you know exactly what I meant by my first comment.
Secondly, your suggestion that forums be allotted properly is a thin veil to put all geo-engineering discussion into skunkworks is an obvious attempt to quell any serious discussion of solar radiation management techniques.
It is quite a shame that you equate 'environmentalism' with chemtrails, but hey!! Your ilk are the ones that vehemently stalk the forum, ardently quashing any semblance of discussion. Do you get a bonus for a forum re-allocation?
This isn't a .gov or .edu site, or a scientific journal site, where members have untold resources to undertake years of scientific study to publish findings. It is a site that has 'speculation' on theories that everyday people identify, and try to make sense of things on hidden research they may not be privy to.
Surely you don't believe all technology and information is given to you from 30 year old textbooks now, do you??
Serious question. Why the concern?
Because geo-engineering and chemtrails (jet emissions) are joined at the hip and efforts to artificially separate them create a situation like where are the boys? and where are the girls?
SRM, full blown, would look exactly like the skies look now - full of it.
Because geo-engineering is not so much a science as it is a conspiracy enabling gross polluters, like airlines, to continue with business as usual.
Because geo-engineering is not about sound ecological practices. It's about money.
[Chemtrails are intimately tied up with geo-engineering because, like this thread, and that been here before feeling, they give us what, for debunkers, can only be called a time warp view of how wild the future skies will look.
Why not solicit interest for a "I survived putting up a thread in the geo-chem forum" if you are feeling vulnerable and put upon.
What "proof" is required and how much "proof" do you need? There's lots of "proof" out there. Whether you believe the proof, is a totally different thing.
DJW001
Okay... before I proceed to my summing up, would somebody please complete the following sentence:
'ATS needs a Chemtrail Forum because __________________________________.'
Exactly how are sending jets of water from the ocean into the air and chemtrails joined at the hip? How is painting roofs white and chemtrails joined at the hip? How are artificial trees and chemtrails joined at the hip? On the other hand, how is spraying Morgellons disease from airplanes geo-engineering? How is dispersing chaff from airplanes geo-engineering?
Why do you think that? What color is sulfur dioxide (Hint: it's not fluffy white.)
If geo-engineering is a cover for polluting, why not publicize it so that people like the practice?
Who is making all this money? Its certainly not the airlines. They are all going bankrupt, merging or getting bailed out by their governments. Where's the money you are talking about?
I'm not even sure what this statement is supposed to mean.
You are the one who is scared witless that your precious Chemtrail Forum will be taken away.
These are questions that get addressed in the chem-geo forum - the one you want to get rid of. The one you've only used once.
Geo-engineering is a conspiracy, not a science. It advocates putting more pollution into the atmosphere rather than cutting emissions. It purports to understand atmospheric chemistry and processes. It is the same as chemtrails - just re-branded and re-packaged because jet emissions to cool us off and act as sunblock never got swallowed. And studies over time showed that they were having the opposite effect: a net warming. The NSA, the thought police, has become the marketing arm of the military, and, chemtrails, morphing to geo-engineering, is the result.
Again...there is a forum (the geo-chem forum) in which to discuss these issues. There's a lot of money to be made in predicting the weather - it impacts on a lot of industries and agriculture. There have been a few incredible threads about this in that forum.
It's the forest for the trees. We all by now are so used to seeing trashed skies that we think it's normal and has always been this way.
Respectfully, I think your assessment is wrong. I enjoy the chem-geo forum a great deal - that's true. It brings together in one forum several different passions of mine: environment, atmospheric visibility and classified weapons. To me, these areas of interest become joined in that forum.
Just venturing here but perhaps your conundrum with the chem-geo forum has more to do with blinders than with facts.
Oh, and I notice that most of the serious threads about geo-engineering have been started by chemtrail skeptics. We all agree it would be a bad idea.
Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by luxordelphi
That would be the Air force then??
Who's "defending" the formation of contrails? They are a consequence of air transport. Or are you saying that air transport should be banned?
Anyone in the chem-geo forum who would spend almost 24/7 defending the trashing of our skies has, imo, serious issues.
luxordelphi
Anyone in the chem-geo forum who would spend almost 24/7 defending the trashing of our skies has, imo, serious issues.
luxordelphi
reply to post by DJW001
Oh, and I notice that most of the serious threads about geo-engineering have been started by chemtrail skeptics. We all agree it would be a bad idea.
I think that within your "we all" contingent there are some serious environmental deviants. Anyone who will spend almost 24/7 defending our trashed skies has, imo, issues.
Who's "defending" the formation of contrails?
Or are you saying that air transport should be banned?
I wonder what the net effect on pollution of that would be.
Got any data we can chew over?
I see. That's why you chose it for your bit of psychiatric diagnosis:
Lord, Phage, this is the business & board questions forum.
Anyone in the chem-geo forum who would spend almost 24/7 defending the trashing of our skies has, imo, serious issues.