GOP set up phishing sites to trick Democrats into donating to the NRCC

page: 2
15
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 11:37 AM
link   
reply to post by zombiefreekshow
 


This

What is the difference between both parties?
They are both owned by the same scum at the top




posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 11:44 AM
link   
It isn't like politicians are the only crew that does this.

When did you ever get a Big Mac that looked like the one in the commercials?

Let me know when McDonalds puts a disclaimer on their ads that tells you that your nuggets are made of ground up chicken skin, bones and fat.



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


Unashamedly profiting by deception?....Sounds about right.



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 03:50 PM
link   
What is the GOP to do ?

They don't have that fraud 'fund raiser' Bill Clinton now do they ?



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 03:53 PM
link   

Grimpachi
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


I say great I think both sides should do this. Once word gets out to the general public no one will trust any website enough to donate. Screw them. Let them breed more distrust, and maybe they will die out.

Scum bags one and all.
edit on 8-2-2014 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)


Both sides DO it.

www.newsmax.com...



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 03:59 PM
link   

neo96

Grimpachi
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


I say great I think both sides should do this. Once word gets out to the general public no one will trust any website enough to donate. Screw them. Let them breed more distrust, and maybe they will die out.

Scum bags one and all.
edit on 8-2-2014 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)


Both sides DO it.

www.newsmax.com...


Linking to a old partisan website proves what? This is from 2011 and no charges or anything else came of it. The gop are doing this now.



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


That article does not say that the Dems set up websites that mislead the public into thinking they are donating to republicans.


That is what I was talking about as in conjunction with the OP. Your article is not the same or even close.


If the Dems start doing the same thing as the reps are doing with misleading website donations I think there will be a lot of pissed off blue hairs because they seem to be the ones who are the more prone to fall for scams.



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 04:06 PM
link   

LDragonFire

neo96

Grimpachi
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


I say great I think both sides should do this. Once word gets out to the general public no one will trust any website enough to donate. Screw them. Let them breed more distrust, and maybe they will die out.

Scum bags one and all.
edit on 8-2-2014 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)


Both sides DO it.

www.newsmax.com...



Linking to a old partisan website proves what? This is from 2011 and no charges or anything else came of it. The gop are doing this now.


Proves BOTH SIDES DO IT.

But hey who cares right!

Bad Gop!



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 04:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Grimpachi
 





If the Dems start doing the same thing as the reps are doing with misleading website donations I think there will be a lot of pissed off blue hairs because they seem to be the ones who are the more prone to fall for scams.


Look up fraud by turning off AVS verification.

And they didn't care.

They only care when it's the GOP.
edit on 8-2-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 04:18 PM
link   

neo96

LDragonFire

neo96

Grimpachi
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


I say great I think both sides should do this. Once word gets out to the general public no one will trust any website enough to donate. Screw them. Let them breed more distrust, and maybe they will die out.

Scum bags one and all.
edit on 8-2-2014 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)


Both sides DO it.

www.newsmax.com...



Linking to a old partisan website proves what? This is from 2011 and no charges or anything else came of it. The gop are doing this now.


Proves BOTH SIDES DO IT.

But hey who cares right!

Bad Gop!


No it doesn't prove anything. I understand your right wing media does preach that there is widespread voter fraud but it isn't true. Your misinformed.

Still waiting for you to prove the Obama administration committed voter fraud, or campaign election law violations...
edit on 8-2-2014 by LDragonFire because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 04:24 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


I looked it up. Some pages were 404ed (who knows why)

However you are trying to equate two totally different things. Maybe you do not understand what the OP is about.

Please provide evidence that Democrats set up phishing sites to trick Republicans into donating to the DNC.

Anything other than that would be switching the subject. No?



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 04:28 PM
link   
reply to post by Grimpachi
 





Anything other than that would be switching the subject. No?


Thought we were talking about politicians taking money through fraudulent means.

Guess we aren't.

Guess we are 'only' talking bout them with an R by their names,.



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 04:31 PM
link   
reply to post by LDragonFire
 


Where there's smoke there's fire...

Officials found guilty in Obama, Clinton ballot petition fraud

Catch "one", a dozen get away.




posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 04:36 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


Actually I was talking about the OP. The title of the OP even.

What you are saying is this is bad here is something else that is bad they are both bad.

One would almost think you are trying to detract from the issue.



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 04:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Grimpachi
 



Maybe you do not understand what the OP is about. 


I do! I do!
It is about a group of people that think (possibly correctly)their peers are either too lazy or too stupid to read text that plainly states who they would be supporting if they donate money.
We are lucky if they are lazy, they probably don't vote.



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 04:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Grimpachi
 


What Issue ?



though the small-print text makes it clear that these are actually sites set up opposing their apparent candidates.


The epic failure of reading by the them ?

edit on 8-2-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 05:12 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


Which is why I said both sides should do it. Then you claimed they did or do.


Did I claim one side is better than the other? Let me answer that. No I did not.

I did say.



Scum bags one and all.


You should take your R&D blinders off.



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 05:30 PM
link   
I see no tricks everything is spelled out clearly.

Its the morons that don't take the time to read things that are the problem.



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 06:33 PM
link   
Forgive me if I don't feel sorry for liberals.



posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 08:04 PM
link   

DrEugeneFixer
Anybody who defends this kind of criminal fraud must be in some kind of deep denial.

It might be that only someone who was careless or somehow impaired would fall for this, but it's still a criminal act to steal through deception, even if your victim is dumb. That applies whether it's political or not.


Read the OP link:


These aren’t the first instances of candidates using web addresses that look at first like rival websites, and the tactic has bipartisan bona fides. Democrats in Florida, for instance, own Jollyforcongress.com, which one might think to be a site for David Jolly, a Republican running in a House special election. The difference is that jollyforcongress.com redirects to a site with all the look and feel of a negative ad, rather than a spoof site.




Anyone who doesn't get that this is NOT a fundraising site for Ann Kirkpatrick.... well they shouldn't be voting in the first place. This is self explanatory.
edit on 8-2-2014 by StoutBroux because: (no reason given)





new topics
top topics
 
15
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join