What are the “Black Triangles”?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 29-11-2004 @ 03:47 PM by intelgurl
Originally posted by metalfan87
Hey everyone, I have a question, and it's sort of off topic alittle bit but kinda relates to this to.. anyways, my question is, everyone talks about black projects that the U.S. military has with the Government and some say that we have stuff that would make Star Wars look like a thing of the past and that were 30-50 years ahead of what we have now. It's all interesting to read about or hear about and i'm sure we do have some advanced stuff but not to make Star Wars look like the past, probably just little experiments. But in other threads people are talking about all these problems with the F-22 and the F-35 JSF... shouldn't these projects be a cake walk to make and produce, considering the "Star Wars" type stuff we have. so why are we having all these problems with the F-22 and F-35 when were so advanced??

Thanks, Metal fan

Great question Metal fan,
Correct me if I'm misinterpreting, but your question breaks down to this:
"If we are 30-50 years ahead technologically then why do we have problems with the F-22 & F35?"

First, I partially agree with your statement (although I tend to think of it being more like 25 yrs ahead), "...I'm sure we do have some advanced stuff but not to make Star Wars look like the past, probably just little experiments"

The DoD throws billions of dollars into black projects every year and most of these are aerospace projects or peripherals of aerospace projects.
Many of these projects may involve a single or small number of functional units.

Has the defense industry produced things that would make "Star Wars" look like the past? No...but they might have developed things that would seem to be on par with "Star Wars" (the movie) technology.

And what then of the question, "If we are 30-50 years ahead technologically then why do we have problems with the F-22 & F35?"
Perhaps there is a 2-fold (maybe more) answer to this...

1. They don't want to reveal/openly use technology prematurely by premiering it on a widely reknowned system like the F-22 or 35.

2. Regardless of the level of technology, any system will have bugs that need to be worked out and the F-22 and 35 are no different. Basically, the level of technology one possesses does not necessarily corespond to the avoidance of bugs in the system that need to be shaken out.


reply posted on 29-11-2004 @ 04:27 PM by intensity
This is a pretty good discussion. And the 50 years advanced question is a good one. Having heard this statement from two highly credible people I'll give you my interpretation.

As far as the F22 et al programs you have to remember that as a system becomes more complex so do the engineering difficulties associated with it. You get multiple contractors working together and it even gets more complex.. actually political. Even if there are some exceedly far out there technologies developed by the government, there are still problems in engineering and assembly. For instance the F22, as amazing and high tech as it is, the wings are built by hand. And it's one thing to build a couple versus manufacturing hundreds of them and having to justify it to congress and the american people. I have no doubt in my mind that the government could be as far ahead as people claim they are. There are certain things that slow down the scientific process and if they were able to avoid those things which they very well can than their research could be much more accellerated than at a company like Boeing or Lockheed.

Now the Phoenix lights. I could be mistaken, but I'm almost positive that it was proven that those were military flairs used for an exercise on the other side of the mountain range in Phoenix. After seeing numerous videos of it that seems the most likely explanation.

The triangles! I have a few theories. My first theory is a lot of the triangles people see are actually triangles..... with their poor vision. Even with good vision a distant plane can look like a triangle. Even Cessnas can look like a triangle from the right direction. I'm not saying that there aren't triangles or UFOs.... I'm just saying I believe there are more reports than actual credible sightings.

Now there are the BBDs that were mentioned. I've enquired about these with a few people and didn't get much of a response, just "oh yeah I've heard about them". The hypothesis which was in the posted link was that these were the next generation of material transports. The only problem I see at present, especially if they have been flying as long as has been claimed........ where do you store the damned things?


reply posted on 29-11-2004 @ 04:52 PM by intensity
Originally posted by Simulacra
Some of you might remember those lights over Phonenix, AZ on March 1997. It was a massive city-wide UFO sighting. And believe it or not, the lights were in a triangular pattern.


The lights weren't in a triangle pattern. And the formation was much larger than a football field, from end to end it was over two miles by my apporximation, maybe larger. I've seen the videos of this, lots of different videos, and it's very clear that it isn't flying around. The lights all of the sudden appear, one by one, from left to right. The SLOWLY drift left to right and down. What you don't see in that picture is that there is a mountain range. Eventually some of the light start to go away. When you take the video and overlay a template of the mountain range the lights are disappearing as they are going behind the mountains. I'm not trying to be devils advocate or whatever, all I'm telling you is I've seen the videos of this and it's very clear that this isn't an aircraft but flares being released from an aircraft.

[edit on 29-11-2004 by intensity]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 16 days ago with 0 member flags