It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There has not been a government yet anywhere that gives a rats arse about its people .. governments DO NOT have your or anyones interest and wellbeing in mind. Never will be a government that puts priority on the people over the "leaders" ..
2 recurring themes: I rule myself and the NWO is here already.
As for ruling yourself I am of the thinking that we need to understand that we impact on each others life, we need to live as a society not billions of independents. Yes we should strive for freedoms and diversity but priorities should be set like how we are using resources, security, legacies & distribution of goods. A Global NWO like I mean would rule the earth, you could have your freedom but if it was conflicting their paths then sorry. The key here is to ensure the Global NWO has good interests for human society.
I don't think there has been any major change in the set up since WWII / the UN. Possibly and probably people are working behind the scenes to steer a Global NWO in their favour but its not the final design by a long way I feel.
I just cant help feeling its a little selfish to protect your own when billions don't get the same rights. Yes we should be able to pass our achievements on for example but what we have to pass on might be limited or shared a bit more fairly.
Another topic is the one of religion. I cant see a Global NWO without it. Thee is to many spiritual & religious people who would be part of a Global NWO. I don't see religion / ideology as such a big problem if again done right.
If a religion did rule the only laws it should be able to enforce would be similar to law not beliefs.
priorities should be set like how we are using resources
If you think back to the Christian movement, they set a new moral code for living your life. Eventually this was adopted by most people and governments of the west. Possibly they saw the alternative of persecution and immoral standards for living as a good enough reason to set rules over peoples life's