posted on Feb, 8 2014 @ 01:27 PM
Seems to be a choice between societies/people that can do what they want leading to breakaway races or a Global NWO. I would think history tells us
what happens to the non-superior race though. I do like the sound of leaving some future generations with very exciting chances or paths but it comes
at a high price for others.
I feel anyone should have a chance to succeed as much as the next person, its what you do not what family or society you belong to. Kings for example
and elite dynasties should be abolished and the leaders should be the real achievers of the times.
Small or large societies regulated by a new doctrine that promotes or enforces that the societies don't get carried away, with some basic laws
regarding resource use, technology, disputes and so on.
It would only take the super powers (leaders or people) to agree to it and the others to see that even though they are still not quite getting the
same deal its for the greater good and in the long term is for their benefit.
If you think back to the Christian movement, they set a new moral code for living your life. Eventually this was adopted by most people and
governments of the west. Possibly they saw the alternative of persecution and immoral standards for living as a good enough reason to set rules over
peoples life's. I think we hold most of those morals passed to us but now we need a new doctrine not for how we live our lives but how our societies
live together and a goal or idea to base decisions on.
I can see why this scares everyone or why people oppose it as its a thin line between fail and success, war and peace, police state or free existence.