Rand Paul demands Dems return money raised by ‘sexual predator’ Bill Clinton

reply to post by buster2010

Are the senators from the left crying give money back like Paul is crying?

They are too busy crying about right wingers( Christie), guns, rich people, christians, corporations,and other stuff.

neo96
right wingers, guns, rich people, christians, corporations,and other stuff.

Yes, dont you know, its a vast right wing conspiracy!

teamcommander
reply to post by neo96

 

I'll go along with that.
I do think he should wait until the day after ALL the republicans involved in the Franklin Affair step forward and admit to their parts.

After all, which is worse a man who cheats with a grown woman or a pediphile?

edit on 8-2-2014 by teamcommander because: (no reason given)

That was a proven Democrat smear infiltration hoax.

This is literally laughable.

The only reason to still talk about Bill's whitehouse is to take Hillary down a peg before the election even gets under way.

Poor form GOP, poor form.

~Tenth

great idea ,

put me down for

$ 22 mill

plus interest at 19 % x 20 years, late payment fees , damages , pain and suffering , penalties etc.


...... let's call it an even $ 1 bill .ion


one step forward

babybunnies
Rand Paul is going further and further off the reservation with every speech he makes.

Why is it that Senators and Congresspeople who make such ridiculous comments on a regular basis get so much attention in the media, while regular lawmakers just going about their regular day are barely known to Americans?

We all know the likes of Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Michelle Bachmann, Marco Rubio, John Boehner, Peter King etc, but do we actually know the people who are really working hard in The House?

These people are the epitome of "the squeaky wheel gets the grease". They know that the more ridiculous the statement is, the more media coverage they will get, and the more free advertising they will get. Free advertising always equals campaign contributions, and they will get re-elected through name brand recognition and continue to be the squeaky wheel cause they know it works.

America deserves better representation than this, but unfortunately, it appears that the average American voter is too stupid to realize that they've been had.

Everybody in here hating on Rand Paul, do you not see the hypocrisy that he is exposing when he calls out Bill Clinton for his "womanizing" while the entire democratic party accuses Republicans for waging a "war on women"?

Read his comments regarding this, READ, don't ASSUME.

tothetenthpower
This is literally laughable.

The only reason to still talk about Bill's whitehouse is to take Hillary down a peg before the election even gets under way.

Poor form GOP, poor form.

~Tenth

Not really, Rand could've been doing a number of things, alerting the Republican donors that he won't back down from the "Clinton Machine".

I think it could've even been that a reporter asked him a question and he answered in the most honest way possible and that snowballed into more interviews with other organizations going deeper and deeper and Rand not minding to answer honestly.

Or....he just wants to call out the Democratic party for their hypocrisy (not their first time for it either...)

BritofTexas

burntheships
reply to post by neo96

 

Rand Paul has a good point actually.

Can't watch the Vid.

Just let me know which Wikipedia page he's plagiarizing this time and I'll go and read that instead.

Congratulations, you are exhibiting the ultimate form of ignorance.

Didn't Newt Gingrich meet his current wife when she was an intern? He was married, at the time, to the woman he had an affair with behind his previous wife's back. He then had an affair with the intern and eventually married her. Rand Paul, ever heard the one about the pot and the tea kettle... ?

p.s. the GOP already squeezed the Clinton affair teet dry 14 years ago.

rupertg
Didn't Newt Gingrich meet his current wife when she was an intern? He was married, at the time, to the woman he had an affair with behind his previous wife's back. He then had an affair with the intern and eventually married her. Rand Paul, ever heard the one about the pot and the tea kettle... ?

p.s. the GOP already squeezed the Clinton affair teet dry 14 years ago.

If you read/listen to what Rand is saying, he is not attacking Bill personally, he is going after the fact he used his position of power/authority to commit workplace sexual crimes, its more about the hypocrisy of the democratic party calling for some end to the "war on women" while idolizing "womanizers".

Did any of you actually watch the video?
The man was answering questions put to him by media representatives. He didn't call a press conference to attack Slick. There are still a boatload of people out there, lots of them in Arkansas who cling to hopes that he will someday be held accountable for his actions while he was AG and Gov of Arkansas.
Rand was pointing out the hypocrisy of the party that claims to champion women's rights while one of their biggest fund raisers is a proven predator of women, amply aided and abetted by the silence of his wife, the woman many think will run for president. How is she any better than the woman who stands back and allows her spouse to abuse children?
Rand also talked about immigration in the interview---did the media make a big deal of that?
He talked about working with Democrats on the things upon which they agree in the area of fighting poverty and the failing economy----did they talk about that?
Do you know why we only heard the remarks about Slick? Because it is about sex and that's what leads every time.
As for the "vast right-wing conspiracy"---all I have to say is that if it was a conspiracy, the GOP did the best job ever of setting it up because I heard the stories that came out as part of that "conspiracy" to take him down before the election ever happened.
One of the major archaeological conferences in the south was held at the Excelsior in Little Rock in October of '92. The election was fast approaching and there was lots of talk. Most of the employees at the Excelsior knew exactly what had been going on there. The bartenders ran regular betting pools on the number of women he would have the State Police "escort" to his room nightly.
So you ask "What difference does it make?" and I say that any man who has that kind of sexual dysfunction is vulnerable on many fronts. A wife who simply stood by and watched----is an even more twisted human than the predator.

Another thread attacking Rand Paul. He's gotten under their skin apparently, excellent!

Be sure to watch the video of what Rand Paul actually said, and the point he was making. El Presidente gets it.

reply to post by eLPresidente

If you read/listen to what Rand is saying, he is not attacking Bill personally, he is going after the fact he used his position of power/authority to commit workplace sexual crimes, its more about the hypocrisy of the democratic party calling for some end to the "war on women" while idolizing "womanizers".

Oh! Okay! It makes sense now, this makes everything all okay! Now that you've explained what a womanizer Bill Clinton apparently was and may still be, I will gladly give up my right to choose what kinds of birth control work best for me!

Yes, now that Rand Paul has spoken out against Bill Clinton, I will gladly allow legislators or promote uneccesary forced vaginal probes before abortive services, and pay for the priviledge! I'm now happy to agree to eliminate Planned Parenthood clinics and force unreasonable and uneccesary restrictions on clinics and doctors, putting trap laws in place and generally putting women at risk all over the nation!

Now that we remember what a putz Bill was, we will gladly give up our right to abort a tragically deformed fetus' after 20 weeks! We will gladly allow forcing teenagers to give birth as a punishment for having sex! We will gladly allow corporations to exert their religious dogmas onto their employees, allowing them to discriminate against women!

Paul brought up a twenty year old bj as evidence of the democratic party's subjugation of women. Why not go back to JFK as well? Franklin D. Roosevelt?

And please keep in mind, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree applies here in spades. It does make for another good GOP clown show, however.