It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Harte I was most certainly under the impression from one of your earlier posts in a discussion with myself when I had not long joined ATS that you were an archaeologist which was fostered by your own comment's,
so You are an engineer, well as one whom also studied that particular field as indeed you may know from that previous discussion I am well versed in how it and all scientifically related disciplines are indeed far more intellectually based than the Pseudo sciences of. Archaeology, anthropology and history which are based on case study and not observation, they are playing detective with missing information and unlike the law once new data casts doubt on there stance it should be a damning indictment of there past convictions and they should indeed modify there approach accordingly but let's be fair WHEN DID THEY,
do you truly expect us to see that the plush, warm bursery sucking back sides whom have built there reputations and doctorates on believed occurance rather than empirical observation with adjustable boundary's are any better than we whom believe in the truth of a lost age or are YOU pushing an agenda,.
reply to post by raymundoko
The interesting thing about the Ark is that we know of no power source able to give an electric shock and it is never reported how the ark was powered or, in fact what it could do. As currently and then it was thought imposssible to store electricity an electric shock seems doubtful surely.