It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by fatdeeman
Okay - the truth of the matter is no-one really knows, but it also cannot be dismissed out of hand. The first NASA photo in lower res, is I believe undoctored. The second higher res one is doctored IMO.
Project Clementine (from what i remember) generated about 1.5 million photos.
I just found the video I watched - maybe you want to view it then think again
Jump to 16:50 to see the relevant segment - he explains about that picture you had being doctored and shows what the REAL image was at 22:20. Please watch that segment.
Definitely eyebrows.edit on 7-2-2014 by g9000 because: (no reason given)
I'm sorry but that's just people trying to sell dvd's and I won't give any of it credence. even in the video description it says "now on dvd!"
It's always the ones selling books or dvds making the wild claims.
For what it's worth he takes the image and claims that he can change the angle of view and lighting without compromising or introducing artificial data which is completely impossible, he's basically "DOCTORED" the image to support his argument.
It's good for dvd sales.
well, it is interesting, and cool to say the least, but i don't think it is a statue.
if you need further proof, try to imagine if you were to look at it from different angles, the dimensions of what appears to be a face from this angle are clearly off and randomly thrown together. In fact, the only thing that really makes the face pop out at you is the eye, and it's relationship to what appears to be a nose. but if you look at the nose, it juts out and connects picasso style. it mainly looks facelike because of the eye and the close straight line going down the middle of the face. it shouldn't be too uncommon to find indents shaped like an eye next to the edge of a rock.. it is quite coincidental we got the perfect angle for it though. wouldn't see it from any other angle.
Thank you all! I have enjoyed reading along with this thread as exploration continued, during quick breaks from work. There have been more than a few interesting findings shared.
I'm really interested to know if anyone has looked more into the symbols above the face that our OP, cavedweller88, pointed out. I find this image of what appears, to my untrained eye at least, to be deliberate symbols of some kind, fascinating. And yes, the symbols also appear to be on ROCKS that for whatever reason still to be determined...are ROCKS that look like a HEAD. Cool stuff regardless!
If anyone has some mad photo skills they can bring to the table tonight, please join in. There is probably a way to bring out these marks more clearly but, it's beyond my pay grade. Here is the area again and a few more photo crops from the NASA image.
What do our ATS members make of these? Is this natural erosion or something else? This area is worth discussion for any number of reasons it seems. Thanks again, what an interesting "what if" read this thread has been.
edit on 7-2-2014 by DancedWithWolves because: (no reason given)
reply to post by cavedweller88
show me these other angles lol
you might be able to get the idea of a face from what you remember of that other angle.. but i seriously doubt if you were not to have seen it from this first angle, you would have noticed it from another one.
you get my point about the dimensions? it was all randomly put together and has no real evidence of craft. the askew line going down the center of the face with it's flat side underneath where the other side of the face should be should be evidence enough..not to mention all the other dimensional flaws. none of the markings look crafted, they are just randomly placed to resemble something, which happens all the time.
but, whatever, you can believe what you want to believe, don't let me ruin your funedit on 01/24/14 by Jarring because: (no reason given)