It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by uncommitted
My point regarding the Bible is that it is a book written by Man, since Man is fallible then so must his interpretation be.
I was lead to believe the Bible shows the clear genealogy of Jesus, starting with Joseph and ending with Adam. It also shows exactly how long each one of them lived. For example it says A is the son of B, who lived 50 years. And B is the son of C, who lived 70 years. If you add up all the ages, the Earth turns out roughly 6,000 years old.edit on 6-2-2014 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)
After last night’s Bill Nye vs. Ken Ham (evolution vs. creationism) debate, it seems fitting to start the day with new research from a Harvard astrophysicist that suggests the first life in the universe may have emerged just 10-20 million years after the Big Bang. This is a few billion years before most scientists believe that the universe had suitable conditions for the genesis of life. If life really did emerge way back then, and then continued to travel through space on the back of asteroids and other interplanetary debris, it would seem almost certain that a) Earth was not the home of the universe’s first life, and b) life on Earth arrived on the back of an asteroid
Did the genesis of life occur just after the Big Bang, almost 14 billion years ago?
This type of article always draws my attention. Where, when and how did the building blocks of life originate?
Do we know enough about what actually constitutes life to even ask the question and expect to be able draw any meaningful conclusion?
Your thoughts please fellow ATS members.
en.wikipedia.org...edit on 6-2-2014 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)