It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A small plate inside with the number 38—the same number that appears on the NASA snapshots—"is 100-percent proof that this camera is the real thing and really was on the moon," Coeln said.
Read more at: phys.org...
NASA's only camera to have made it to the moon and back as part of the Apollo manned missions will be auctioned in Vienna on March 21, organisers said Thursday.
Read more at: phys.org...
While 13 identical cameras landed on the Moon, only number 1038 came back. The normal procedure was to leave the cameras behind along with other equipment in order to save liftoff weight, which could be used for taking more rock samples back to Earth. Irwin's camera was the exception because the film magazine jammed, so the camera had to return to remove it.
Westlicht says that number 1038 eventually ended up in the hands of private collector Alain Lazzarini, author of the book Hasselblad and the Moon. It comes with extensive documentation and is identified by the number 38 on the reseau plate, which can be seen on photographs taken with the camera, the NASA number P/N SEB 33100040- S/N 103 engraved on the body, and the number P/N SEB 33101018-301 S/N 1003 HASSELBLAD REFLEX CAMERA FILM MAGAZINE on the magazine.
The auction will be held on March 22, when the starting bid for the Moon camera will be €80,000 (US$108,000) with estimates of the final price set at €150,000 to €200,000 (US$203,000 to US$270,000). Source www.gizmag.com...
If you'd read more of the collectspace article, and the thread devoted to it
Based on the information released publicly to date, no, we do not know how Irwin's camera entered private hands.
SayonaraJupiter
Nobody knows where this camera was before the previous auction?
SayonaraJupiter
If NASA doesn't wan't this camera at auction, then, it is reasonable to presume that NASA probably believes it's a fake.
SayonaraJupiter
... so my reasoning goes that this camera is a total fraud. It can't be the camera. Well? What do you think?
Conclusion: Yes, also the Apollo 15 CDR's HEDC was brought back. Source www.collectspace.com...
SayonaraJupiter
Stupid youtube videos now?
I remember reading somewhere that NASA deemed it necessary to DUMP the Apollo Hasselblad camera's on the surface of the moon because of weight considerations. Oh yea, here it is, right here!
Hasselblads On The Moon
www.abovetopsecret.com...
When I brought up the subject of the missing cameras with Apollo Defenders they agreed with the weight arguments, they agreed with NASA and the lack of Hasselblad's brought back. Now, we find out, from Robert Pearlman, the editor of collectspace.com that :
Conclusion: Yes, also the Apollo 15 CDR's HEDC was brought back. Source www.collectspace.com...
This means 2 Hasselblad camera's from Apollo 15 made it back from the "moon". Which means weight was not a consideration when bringing back the cameras, as the Apollo Defenders have argued.
Maybe Apollo Defenders want to review that thread and see how wrong they all were about the quantities of Hasselblads returned from the "moon".
And was this a discovery by a hoax believer, or an 'Apollo defender'? Did some conspiracy kook uncover a great secret or was it someone who believes Apollo happened as documented and that astronauts landed on the moon. Oh wait, it was me. An 'Apollo defender'.
You always argued that leaving the cameras behind, or 'hiding' the ones they brought back was a deliberate attempt to falsify evidence. You even claimed Irwin's camera was dropped in the ocean. All this time they are in a display cabinet in a private collection, all covered in moondust.
The argument that weight mattered and this is why they were supposed to leave them is a perfectly reasonable one and in the absence of evidence to prove otherwise there was no reason to dispute it. That astronauts may have ignored those instructions is entirely understandable. I'd even bet that there is more moon rock in existence than documented in the Apollo samples, because if I was up there I'd sure as hell have a pebble for myself.
Unfortunately for you what this camera will prove, if it is indeed the genuine article, is that Hasselblad cameras made it to the moon in the hands of astronauts, took photographs and then came back again. Which is kind of what 'Apollo defenders' have been saying happened all along.
What happens to your argument now?
onebigmonkey
You will also have found out from the collecspace site that both Gene Cernan and Alan Shepard's camera both made it back to Earth, and I believe there is evidence that Dave Scott (also Apollo 15) brought his home (the number 31 is visible on a picture of the moon well after the LM was discarded.
It wouldsn't surprise me if there aren't more of these cameras hidden away - as far as I am concerned the astronauts earned their souvenirs.
May 17, 2013 — The joystick controller used to steer the Apollo 11 spacecraft to the moon, the original recording of Neil Armstrong's heartbeat when he took humankind's first "small step" onto the lunar surface, and the complete tool kit carried on NASA's final manned moon mission won't be auctioned later this month, despite international headlines that heralded the rare space artifacts' sale.
The rare moon memorabilia was pulled from the sale after NASA requested time to look into the artifacts' ownership, according to RR. The agency's general counsel wanted to ensure that the items were no longer federal property.
Source www.collectspace.com...
RR Auction, a New Hampshire-based online auction house that specializes in autographs but has in recent years held space history-themed memorabilia sales, had featured the now-withdrawn Apollo-era artifacts in videos and releases issue to promote their current auction ending on May 23.