It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Absolutely clueless and ignorant about science, Ham is also fond of dismissing any evidence on the grounds that the presenter is (purportedly) an atheist – a standard conspiracy theory trick, really.
reply to post by SuperFrog
Says the person who talks about fine tuned galaxies and the destruction of life five times on The planet earth
You have no clue about science
Eta susskind , who I am sure you have no understanding of . Is a scientist. He doesnt like that there may be a creator. But he admits it is possible. He wrote the book on The megaverse which I am also sure you dont understand
But facts remain facts. And we may never know as if there is evidence of a creator or other universe we may simply never get that evidence as lit exists outside of us
See how science really works
You are just an antireligion nut. No better than ham. When confronted by evidence it is blown off
reply to post by Prezbo369
yes your puddle argument has been covered. and i have listed it as a possibility
you just dont seem to get that there could be other reasons
all acceptable to you BUT a creator
why is this?
...the chances or likelihood of that being true are are around the same as the universe and reality being the figment of a house cat's imagination.
Possible, but incredibly unlikely.
Um I have not made anysuch claims.
I have said that i believe in a creator.
I have also make I clrear my idea of a creator is not the biblical kind.
Mine is snce there is no evidence for multiple universes or anthropic principals or a creator
So we can all believe what we want
Multiple universes have just as much evidence as a creator .
So why is it less believable?
And there is good reason. The finetuned universe.
No the multiverse came from the finetuning observations
A n d the only way out, with out a creator, was multiple universes