It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Let’s face it, there was a bishop [Ussher] who added up the dates listed in Genesis and he came up with the world had been around for 6,000 years,” Robertson said. “There ain’t no way that’s possible. To say that it all came about in 6,000 years is just nonsense and I think it’s time we come off of that stuff and say this isn’t possible.”
He continued: “We’ve got to be realistic that the dating of Bishop Ussher just doesn’t comport with anything that is found in science and you can’t just totally deny the geological formations that are out there.”
Robertson added that he disagrees with “evolution as it is currently presented” and knocked Creationists: “Let’s be real, let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”
ReturnofTheSonOfNothing
Pat Robertson weighs into the debate, attacks YEC as "..a joke"
“Let’s face it, there was a bishop [Ussher] who added up the dates listed in Genesis and he came up with the world had been around for 6,000 years,” Robertson said. “There ain’t no way that’s possible. To say that it all came about in 6,000 years is just nonsense and I think it’s time we come off of that stuff and say this isn’t possible.”
He continued: “We’ve got to be realistic that the dating of Bishop Ussher just doesn’t comport with anything that is found in science and you can’t just totally deny the geological formations that are out there.”
Robertson added that he disagrees with “evolution as it is currently presented” and knocked Creationists: “Let’s be real, let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”
Well. Alrighty then..
I think Ham is onto a winner here.
You see, his views are very easily provable. All he needs is a dinosaur bone - not a fossil, mind, but an actual bone - and there must be millions of them laying on, or just below, the surface. It can only be a matter of time until he uncovers the evidence...
flyingfish
There is no evidence for creationism, pretending that creationism is good science is one of the foundational stupidities of creationism. Ham deploying this bit of idiocy in this debate is shooting himself in the foot declaring there can be no good science of the past from the physical evidence, it proves that he knows that the evidence is against him.
Logarock
flyingfish
There is no evidence for creationism, pretending that creationism is good science is one of the foundational stupidities of creationism. Ham deploying this bit of idiocy in this debate is shooting himself in the foot declaring there can be no good science of the past from the physical evidence, it proves that he knows that the evidence is against him.
There is far to much evidence of science in nature to discount creationism. Evolutional scientists are as guilty of the cognitive desistance they feel the other side suffers from. Everywhere one turns in nature they find intelligent design but are simply bent on giving the credit to evolutionary adaptation.
The debate of creationism vs evolution is not the same as intelligent design. The young earth creationists which are an extreme minority, probably fewer than there are atheists in the world.
-FBB
Leonidas
The debate of creationism vs evolution is not the same as intelligent design. The young earth creationists which are an extreme minority, probably fewer than there are atheists in the world.
-FBB
Please tell us your interpretation and understanding of Intelligent Design.
Define the Problem
Do Background Research
Specify Requirements
Brainstorm Solutions
Choose the Best Solution
Do Development Work
Build a Prototype
Test and Redesign
I think Ham is onto a winner here.
You see, his views are very easily provable. All he needs is a dinosaur bone - not a fossil, mind, but an actual bone - and there must be millions of them laying on, or just below, the surface. It can only be a matter of time until he uncovers the evidence...
Logarock
There is far to much evidence of science in nature to discount creationism.