posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 09:28 AM
a reply to: FreeWillAnomaly
I think that at a certain moment these 'elite' conspiracy theorists had something real to tell the world and became in demand to speak about their
find. It went so well for these guys that some start writing a book about it and as time passed by everybody knew and their message became old news.
To keep their income flowing some did some good research and came with new 'facts' about the hidden (occult) world. And on the other hand others
grasped anything outthere, true or not.. and began to spread that information. This discredited many of them.. but because of their earlier
contribution many people consider their information trust worthy.
I think Dr Steven Greer is a good example of that.... his 2000 disclosure project is considered an excellent effort to inform the public. But as the
years went by he couldn't sustain that succes and needed something else, something new. At that point he started to become creative with all kind of
flimsy 'facts', theories and nightly gatherings to watch Ufo's for a ridiculous amount of money if you want to join. On the other side there is a
Stanton Friedman or Richard Dolan.. Their credibillity is high due to their solid investigations and they do their utmost not to go too far in the
deep end where things become real blurry and ... stupid.
So, what I am trying to say is that these guys need to make living.. some take the responsibillity and feed us quality research and others thrive on
previous succes and stay afloat with selling us nonsense. It is for us to keep critical and think clear.
That is what I make of all these 'con-artists'.
edit on 24/1/2015 by zatara because: (no reason given)