It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
netbound
I’ve gotta admit, I share NoRulesAllowed’s skepticism about the Big Bang. I believe a number of mainstream physicists are also skeptical about it.
I think the “logic” behind the BB is that, if the universe (space and everything within it) is expanding, then “logically” it must have at some time occupied a smaller volume. Well, yeah, that makes sense. “Logically”. But that it once occupied the volume of a softball (or smaller), might that be following our “logic” to such an extreme as to lead to an “illogical” conclusion? That’s what I wonder. This is just a feeling, however. I’m certainly no expert.
We Humans developed our brand of “logic” to make sense of our experiences and observations as Earthlings at our particular macro level. Then along came the 20th century and the development of relativity to explain events on the large scale and quantum mechanics/physics to describe observations at the atomic/subatomic level. So much for reason and intuitive “logic”.
I spent 4 years getting a B.S. in mathematics (not an advanced degree, so like I said, I’m no expert), have great respect for science and technology, and have worked in the computer industry for many years. BUT, unlike many others, I do not hold up OUR invention of mathematics as the last word, or as a universally accepted language amongst any sufficiently advanced technology or intelligence. It’s just the best thing we humans have come up with so far to express our human reasoning. It doesn’t mean it’s the ONLY method. If we were born in a black hole, for instance, maybe we would have developed a more adequate description of it’s workings and behavior by now. Since we weren’t, though, we’re still struggling to develop an adequate model using our current mathematics/physics. We just can’t get there from here - at least, not yet.
I guess what I’m getting at is, although I value scientific reasoning and protocol and support it’s advancement, I also have a skeptical side, and do not consider it a “religion”. At least, not in every case...
ChaoticOrder
Forget what you learnt about the shape of the universe when you were back at school. The universe is most likely infinite according to the latest data and theories we have. What that means is that space-time is infinite and there is nothing outside of it because it encompasses everything. What that also means is that the big bang was probably not responsible for creating space-time along with it, infinite space-time has probably always existed.
Although the shape of the universe is still a matter of debate in physical cosmology, based on the recent Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) measurements "We now know that the universe is flat with only a 0.4% margin of error", according to NASA scientists.
--
The model most theorists currently use is the so-called Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) model. According to cosmologists, on this model the observational data best fit with the conclusion that the shape of the universe is infinite and flat.
en.wikipedia.org...edit on 2/2/2014 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)
The shape of the universe is the local and global geometry of the universe, in terms of both curvature and topology (though, strictly speaking, it goes beyond both). Although the shape of the universe is still a matter of debate in physical cosmology, based on the recent Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) measurements "We now know that the universe is flat with only a 0.4% margin of error", according to NASA scientists. [1] Theorists have been trying to construct a formal mathematical model of the shape of the universe. In formal terms, this is a 3-manifold model corresponding to the spatial section (in comoving coordinates) of the 4-dimensional space-time of the universe. The model most theorists currently use is the so-called Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) model. According to cosmologists, on this model the observational data best fit with the conclusion that the shape of the universe is infinite and flat, [2] but the data are also consistent with other possible shapes, such as the so-called Poincaré dodecahedral space[3][4]and the Picard horn.[5]
it's not though. it is flatter than a pancake. we now know the curvature of the universe to within 1 percent.
MADXENOBIOLOGIST
reply to post by LightSource
Einstein's relativity proves the space time continuum is curved.
The new results, presented by Schlegel and his colleagues here today (Jan. 8) at the 223rd meeting of the American Astronomical Society, also provide one of the best-ever determinations of the curvature of space, researchers said. In short, the universe appears to be quite "flat," meaning that its shape can be described well by Euclidean geometry, in which straight lines are parallel and the angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees.
"One of the reasons we care is that a flat universe has implications for whether the universe is infinite," Schlegel said. "That means — while we can't say with certainty that it will never come to an end — it's likely the universe extends forever in space and will go on forever in time. Our results are consistent with an infinite universe."
MADXENOBIOLOGIST
reply to post by netbound
According to scientific theory, when the universe stops expanding it will eventually "condense" in what is known as the "Big Crunch". Then, when it get's infinitely small, it will explode again into a second big bang, and so on and so fourth in a repeating cycle.
Some groups of Buddhists and Hindus have directly incorporated this modern science theory into their traditional religion. Because these two religions believe in reincarnation, they have used this scientific theory as further proof that reality is a cycle, and that as the universe recycles itself, so do our souls.*
*I don't necessarily believe this, but it's fun to speculate.
stormbringer1701
it's not though. it is flatter than a pancake. we now know the curvature of the universe to within 1 percent.
MADXENOBIOLOGIST
reply to post by LightSource
Einstein's relativity proves the space time continuum is curved.
www.space.com...
The new results, presented by Schlegel and his colleagues here today (Jan. 8) at the 223rd meeting of the American Astronomical Society, also provide one of the best-ever determinations of the curvature of space, researchers said. In short, the universe appears to be quite "flat," meaning that its shape can be described well by Euclidean geometry, in which straight lines are parallel and the angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees.
"One of the reasons we care is that a flat universe has implications for whether the universe is infinite," Schlegel said. "That means — while we can't say with certainty that it will never come to an end — it's likely the universe extends forever in space and will go on forever in time. Our results are consistent with an infinite universe."
if you add that to the fact that expansion appears to be accelerating and you get infinite unbounded universe. well there is a boundary as someone pointed out that there are places that the light from us has not gotten to and the light from those places has not gotten to us which means effectively they are outside of an event horizon for all intents and purposes. though that event horizon is not static it moves at light speed. if however cosmic expansion ever out paces light there would be places we could never go or see ever.
edit on 5-2-2014 by stormbringer1701 because: added an entire additional data point
that wouldn't be the Hawking radiation though. in Hawking radiation a virtual pair forms at the event horizon with one particle on the outside and one on the inside. the one on the outside is what we typically call Hawking radiation. the particle on the inside cannot get out through the event horizon there but may go through a an Einstein Podelski Rosen Bridge to come out of a white hole somewhere else if it does not hit the singularity. another possible source of hawking radiation is quantum tunneling particles that happen to tunnel through the even horizon.
MADXENOBIOLOGIST
reply to post by stormbringer1701
It's possible that when black holes spew out hawking radiation, it all collects in another dimension, and the build up of this radiation results in the birth of parallel universes and other realities.
LightSource
stormbringer1701
it's not though. it is flatter than a pancake. we now know the curvature of the universe to within 1 percent.
MADXENOBIOLOGIST
reply to post by LightSource
Einstein's relativity proves the space time continuum is curved.
www.space.com...
The new results, presented by Schlegel and his colleagues here today (Jan. 8) at the 223rd meeting of the American Astronomical Society, also provide one of the best-ever determinations of the curvature of space, researchers said. In short, the universe appears to be quite "flat," meaning that its shape can be described well by Euclidean geometry, in which straight lines are parallel and the angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees.
"One of the reasons we care is that a flat universe has implications for whether the universe is infinite," Schlegel said. "That means — while we can't say with certainty that it will never come to an end — it's likely the universe extends forever in space and will go on forever in time. Our results are consistent with an infinite universe."
if you add that to the fact that expansion appears to be accelerating and you get infinite unbounded universe. well there is a boundary as someone pointed out that there are places that the light from us has not gotten to and the light from those places has not gotten to us which means effectively they are outside of an event horizon for all intents and purposes. though that event horizon is not static it moves at light speed. if however cosmic expansion ever out paces light there would be places we could never go or see ever.
edit on 5-2-2014 by stormbringer1701 because: added an entire additional data point
An "infinite" circle would appear to be flat however with 1 percent curvature it would eventually reach itself in a long long time. Maybe its "tube" shape and will come around. Or we could just be a hologram and there is no "shape" flat or circular. Either way i guess we can agree that we disagree.
edit on 5-2-2014 by LightSource because: (no reason given)
spy66
LightSource
stormbringer1701
it's not though. it is flatter than a pancake. we now know the curvature of the universe to within 1 percent.
MADXENOBIOLOGIST
reply to post by LightSource
Einstein's relativity proves the space time continuum is curved.
www.space.com...
The new results, presented by Schlegel and his colleagues here today (Jan. 8) at the 223rd meeting of the American Astronomical Society, also provide one of the best-ever determinations of the curvature of space, researchers said. In short, the universe appears to be quite "flat," meaning that its shape can be described well by Euclidean geometry, in which straight lines are parallel and the angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees.
"One of the reasons we care is that a flat universe has implications for whether the universe is infinite," Schlegel said. "That means — while we can't say with certainty that it will never come to an end — it's likely the universe extends forever in space and will go on forever in time. Our results are consistent with an infinite universe."
if you add that to the fact that expansion appears to be accelerating and you get infinite unbounded universe. well there is a boundary as someone pointed out that there are places that the light from us has not gotten to and the light from those places has not gotten to us which means effectively they are outside of an event horizon for all intents and purposes. though that event horizon is not static it moves at light speed. if however cosmic expansion ever out paces light there would be places we could never go or see ever.
edit on 5-2-2014 by stormbringer1701 because: added an entire additional data point
An "infinite" circle would appear to be flat however with 1 percent curvature it would eventually reach itself in a long long time. Maybe its "tube" shape and will come around. Or we could just be a hologram and there is no "shape" flat or circular. Either way i guess we can agree that we disagree.
edit on 5-2-2014 by LightSource because: (no reason given)
Your infinite circle can not be infinite in any way if it ends up as a circle "reaching its tail". I thought you People knew what you were talking about.
There is no existing matter or particle that is less than 3D. 2D can only exist on a surface of a matter that is a minimum 3D.
dragonridr
As i said no way watch the video the CMB only confirmed it space is expanding its not looping its not a balloon. For your theory to be correct there would have to be expansion from only one point but its everywhere we look.