It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
onequestion
reply to post by aoxomoxoa
Thats right.
How much of it has to do with economic policy and lobbying politics?
onequestion
reply to post by aoxomoxoa
What happened to personal choice?
By fluoridating the water they are forcing the consumer to choose alternative more costly solutions to having clean water right?
Like Phage said, just go buy water. But were already paying for water.
edit on 20142America/ChicagoquAmerica/Chicago1128482014 by onequestion because: (no reason given)
But were already paying for water.
Do not exceed the dose recommended by your doctor or dentist. Notify your dentist if your teeth become spotted or stained. Sodium fluoride chewable tablets is not recommended for use in CHILDREN younger than 6 months old; safety and effectiveness in these children have not been confirmed. Caution is advised when using sodium fluoride chewable tablets in CHILDREN younger than 6 years old. The appropriate dose of sodium fluoride chewable tablets depends on the child's age and the amount of fluoride in the drinking water. Talk with your doctor if you have questions about the appropriate dose for your child or the amount of fluoride in your drinking water. PREGNANCY and BREAST-FEEDING: If you become pregnant while taking sodium fluoride chewable tablets, contact your doctor. You will need to discuss the benefits and risks of using sodium fluoride chewable tablets while pregnant. It is not known if sodium fluoride chewable tablets is found in breast milk. If you are or will be breast-feeding while you are using sodium fluoride chewable tablets, check with your doctor. Discuss the risks to your baby.
Yup. A total cost of $0.50 to $3.00 per person per year. Exorbitant.
I'm sure that the cost of all those extra measures to protect their hardware from fluoride damage are passed on to everyone.
reply to post by Phage
You can buy distilled water at your neighborhood store. Your choice. I don't want to pay to have distilled tap water.
A popular vote? That's cool. It is exactly the sort of thing that should be decided by the community, not politicians. At least that way it can be people over science rather than politics over science. It also provides a clearer view of the community opinion.
Next year our city of about 75 K is putting it to a vote and I suspect it will be removed at that time
Phage
reply to post by Iwinder
No need. My water is fine the way it is.
A popular vote? That's cool. It is exactly the sort of thing that should be decided by the community, not politicians. At least that way it can be people over science rather than politics over science. It also provides a clearer view of the community opinion.
Next year our city of about 75 K is putting it to a vote and I suspect it will be removed at that time
edit on 2/2/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Shouldnt it be individual choice rather then community choice? If you want fluoride in water then put it there dont make us all drink it cause you want it.
Shouldnt it be individual choice rather then community choice?
Phage
reply to post by Witness2008
Yup. A total cost of $0.50 to $3.00 per person per year. Exorbitant.
I'm sure that the cost of all those extra measures to protect their hardware from fluoride damage are passed on to everyone.
www.wda.org...
edit on 2/2/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)
For one thing, it is a public health issue.
A real bargain, until you realize how cheaply our bodies are being sold as waste treatment centers for the fertilizer and aluminum industries.