It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MessageforAll
reply to post by TrueBrit
I see, well that's good to know, the article on RT provided by OP didn't really specify it wasn't a nuke plant.
in other words, you don't s**t where you eat.
diddy1234
in other words, you don't s**t where you eat.
unless you live in the UK where the government treats everyone as thick idiots that must be force fed political B***S*** news
angelchemuel
Same thing happened a couple of years ago...there was a thread here about it....
Nothing serious then either...
Rainbows
Jane
zeroBelief
TrueBrit
Also, I think it is worth pointing out that Sellafield will never be the focus of a Fukushima grade nuclear event, because of the difference between the purposes of these two installations. Sellafield is essentially a dump for nuclear material, where as the Fukushima Daiichi plant was an actual reactor. Totally different issues surround both, but there will not be any manner of explosion at Sellafield, assuming no one starts throwing blocks of C4 around like party favours.
Well....
A very good friend of mine works at Sellafield. And just the other day he was telling me that there is a known scenario where should a certain event occur, the site and surrounding areas (to which he intimated that it would be quite a distance) would have 12 hours to evacuate before a rather sincere event.
I'm going to email him right now and find out what the situation is. I'll follow it up with a phone call once I am awake.
I'll let everyone know what I find out.
woogleuk
That being said...I still think Sellafield is a major incident waiting to happen, too many times people cut corners in sensitive areas and it's only a matter of time before we see a major incident (again) on the aging equipment there...more than the usual water leaks we have seen in the (recent) past.