It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
tintin2012
It is worth remembering that the overthrow of Mohammad Mosaddegh (Iran) was for the longest of time in the realm of conspiracy theory "nuts". Not any more. Same goes for the French Revolution. This was no grassroots movement. The seeds may have been planted there but the "gardeners" were in the upper class. To plant any "seeds" you need MONEY. No money and organization, no revolutions.
The French Revolution IMHO was planned for some time. I doubt it was an overnight affair., as overnight affairs have no lasting energy and there must be someone "feeding" the movement.
tintin2012
The people behind the revolution would have to be in a "CLUB". Being in a club allows you to ,
- spread a "web" of individuals around the target
- study the people best suited for the revolt
- have an excuse to frequently meet to discuss plans and objectives
- to camouflage the organization I would have 2-3 tiers of members. Bottom being there to make the CLUB "look" like just a social org.
- level 2 are the CLUB's soldiers and levels 3 are the leaders. 2 knows as little as possible about 3 .
What you have above best fits into the structure called Masonic Movement. The hidden but open "web" of puppets.
tintin2012
I would argue that it was not a strictly French nationalistic movement but an "internationalist" movement (lets call it IM).
poet1b
reply to post by RedFunfzhen
So you think the French would be better off if they had never revolted?
They should have stuck with the King and the aristocracy? Like say, China?
poet1b
reply to post by RedFunfzhen
The French revolution wasn't occurring soley in France. All across Europe people were speaking out against the abuses of the old aristocracy.
No one was in control.
tintin2012
You have chosen a good historical event to
We have the same problem that Carroll had (so I believe), no written evidence. We can only speculate and use deductive/inductive reasoning as would be done in Court
poet1b
reply to post by RedFunfzhen
My link pointed out that the Rovolution in France was spread throughout Europe. Any study on the history of Europe during that period will tell you the same thing.
Heck, you can believe the world is flat if that is what you want to believe, it doesn't change the history of the era.
I don't know why some people want to believe that the PTB are undefeatable, when history demonstrates quite the opposite.
An apparently bugged phone conversation in which a senior US diplomat disparages the EU over the Ukraine crisis has been posted online. A voice resembling that of Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland refers to the EU using a graphic swear word, in a conversation apparently with the US ambassador to Ukraine. The US said Ms Nuland had "apologised for these reported comments". The EU and US are involved in talks to end months of unrest in Ukraine.
The conversation is mainly focused on Ukraine’s government and President Viktor Yanukovich's offer last month to make opposition leader Arseniy Yatsenyuk the new prime minister and Vitaly Klitschko deputy prime minister. “I don’t think that Klitschko should go into the government. I don’t think it is necessary. I don’t think it is a good idea,” a female voice - allegedly Nuland - said. “In terms of him not going into the government, just let him stay out and do his political homework,” a male voice - believed to be Pyatt - replied. “In terms of the process moving ahead, we want to keep the moderate democrats together,” he said. As Nuland sees it, Ukrainian opposition leader Arseniy Yatsenyuk should be in charge of the new government and Klitschko would not get along with him. “It’s just not going to work,” she said. Nuland added that she has also been told that UN chief Ban Ki-moon is about to appoint the former Dutch ambassador to Kiev, Robert Serry, as his representative to Ukraine. "That would be great I think to help glue this thing and have the UN glue it and you know, f**k the EU," she said in apparent reference to their differences over policies. "We've got to do something to make it stick together, because you can be pretty sure that if it does start to gain altitude the Russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it," Pyatt replied. US State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki declined to comment on the tape’s contents, but did not deny its authenticity. "I did not say it was not authentic," she said, adding that Nuland had apologized to her EU counterparts for the reported comments.
So, if one wants to differentiate between the 'revolutions at different geographic locations and time frames across the whole of Europe' and the French Revolution, the are as 'idiotic' as a Flat Earther?
Trading one oligarcichal master for another is anything but a victorious defeat of the PTB at the hands of the masses.
poet1b
Throughout most of history, most people have lived relatively free from power and control. They taught you in school that these people were backwards, uncivlized.
tintin2012
You have chosen a good historical event to study because it is sufficiently far in the past and not to close to the present to show how "capital" rules.
It is worth remembering that the overthrow of Mohammad Mosaddegh (Iran) was for the longest of time in the realm of conspiracy theory "nuts". Not any more. Same goes for the French Revolution. This was no grassroots movement. The seeds may have been planted there but the "gardeners" were in the upper class. To plant any "seeds" you need MONEY. No money and organization, no revolutions.
The French Revolution IMHO was planned for some time. I doubt it was an overnight affair., as overnight affairs have no lasting energy and there must be someone "feeding" the movement.
Lets take a look at what you have proposed,
RedFunfzhen
That's not at all what I said, nor my intent. The simple fact is that the public was whipped up into a murderous rage by a few folks, all seemingly tied to Secret Societies - and other things.
Hell yea, band together. Just make sure it is YOU controlling the banding and revolution.
Necker was born in Geneva, Switzerland. His father was a native of Küstrin in Neumark (Prussia, now Kostrzyn nad Odrą, Poland), and had, after the publication of some works on international law, been elected as professor of public law at Geneva, of which he became a citizen. Jacques Necker was sent to Paris in 1747, to become a clerk in the bank of Isaac Vernet, a friend of his father. By 1762, he was a partner and by 1765, through successful speculations, had become a very wealthy man. He soon afterwards established, with another Genevese, the famous bank of Thellusson, Necker et Cie. Pierre Thellusson superintended the bank in London (his son was made a peer as Baron Rendlesham), while Necker was managing partner in Paris. Both partners became very rich by loans to the treasury and speculations in grain.
Now this is anything but this simple, his career that is.
Jacob Vernet wuchs als Sohn des Kaufmanns Isaac Vernet (1664−1706) und der Jeanne, geborene Richard (1663−1733) in Genf auf. Die Familie Vernet emigrierte im 17. Jahrhundert aus der Provence und sein Grossvater Jacob erlangte das Bürgerrecht (Bourgeois) im Jahre 1659. Sein Bruder Isaac (1700−1773) war Banquier und ab 1738 Mitglied des Rates der Zweihundert (Conseil des Deux-Cents') und in seiner BankLabhard et Vernet in Paris begann Jacques Necker seine Karriere.
Isaac Vernet had retired in 1762; ... in the firm; three years later, Necker assumed the sole direction of the bank, while Thelusson took over the London branch
from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Peter [de] Thellusson (27 June 1737 — 21 July 1797) was a Swiss businessman and banker who settled in London. Thellusson was a member of a Huguenot family which had fled France for Geneva in the 16th century.[1] His father Isaac had started a Swiss bank (Thellusson, Necker et Cie) and became the Genevan ambassador to Paris. Peter, with the help of his brother George-Tobie, managed the successful bank in partnership with Jacques Necker, the Thellussons managing the London branch of the bank from 1760 with Necker managing the Paris branch. Both partners became very rich by loans to the treasury and speculation in grain. He started his own finance house in Philpot Lane and in 1761 took British nationality by Act of Parliament. On 6 January 1760[1] he married Ann, daughter of Matthew Woodford and sister of Sir Ralph Woodford of Carlby, Lincolnshire.[1]
Fonblanque
Fonblanque was descended, according to a member of the family, from the Greniers of Languedoc, a Huguenot family ennobled by Henri IV. In 1740 Abel de Grenier, Comte de Fonblanque, sent his two sons to England to be educated as Protestants; one of them, John, who succeeded his father and disposed of the French estates, settled in London as a merchant in partnership with his brother Anthony and was naturalized. After his death in 1760 his business fell into the hands of Peter Thellusson his bookkeeper, who secured it for himself.1
Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt
MessageforAll My question is... If we use this as a baseline... What have we learned from the civil unrest in Kiev? Egypt? Tunesia?Libya...
soficrow
Well done. Do you also see similarities with the so-called American Revolution?
F&S