It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
teslahowitzer
reply to post by AlwaysIdeaMan
Tell the good doctor to get to work on the gravitational control this will take, and spend millions, take years of research and development, by the greatest minds, test, safety, effects, and on and on to give you free energy... im sure the doc and everyone is busting their ass and spending all of their money and time and the end result will be... all free......holy friggin poop....read it over and over....your utopia is in your own mind...this theology is possible on earth...in about 200 years, but not with this crooked government...bottom up overhaul, no redistribution, you didnt earn it you do not get it, period. so the lazier i am the more i should get? what is my reason to get out of bed? why should I make any effort to do ANYTHING? and if everyone is the same???
nenothtu
AlwaysIdeaMan
LOL! Nobody will take any material thing from you if we move away from money and accounting for human energy.
I'm not worried about anyone taking "any material thing" - the idea is absurd if wealth is not measured in material things any more. What I'm saying is that they will try to "redistribute" whatever it IS measured in. If wealth is instead measured in, lets say ideas per second, they will try to take some of mine and redistribute them to Charlie down the block who hasn't had an original idea since he had the idea to invest in a case of "billy" Beer in 1978. If, instead, wealth is measured in friends, they'll try to take some of mine or yours (maybe some of mine AND some of yours) to "redistribute" to Quentin, who just sits on the curb all day forlorn because he can't figure out how to get his own. If wealth is measured in family ties... well, you get the picture. the have-nots will always be squalling because they are have-nots, and can't figure out how to be haves. They want Uncle Sugar to get it from someone else and give it to them so that they can be "haves" too. It doesn't matter WHAT they don't have - they WANT it simply because they don't already have it, all the same.
Umm... don' tell anyone, 'cause i guess it's a secret, but I already HAVE that choice, as does everyone else if they just care to see it and exercise it. Most people, however, appear to be too wrapped up in crying over what they don't have to see what is right in front of them, that they DO have.
Really? The starving artist working at McDumps has the choice to paint with paints they can't afford? With canvases they can't afford? In a studio they can't afford? No... Most people are working for the weekend when they CAN do what they want to do IF they can afford it. We all are trying to "get ahead, but I have news for you, only a very small fraction can get there.
Abundance won't flow at all until people start realizing what they already have, instead of worrying over what they DON'T have, and how to get it. "Abundance" never comes when you don't have what you are always reaching for, and if people had everything they wanted, they'd just find something else to want, and to pine away over not having.
That starving child is likely realizes what he has, eh? Um... What DOES he have?
Food is not just going to magically appear in front of starving Ethiopian kids. That ain't going to happen no matter how much "free energy" you can manage to inject into the system. Acquiring food takes more than just wishful thinking.
Heh. You don't think all those people who now contribute $20 to charities (that pay themselves first and maybe 2% gets to the ones in need) because they can't afford to go feed them themselves but they do care, being freed to travel, arrange food shipments, and go help directly would sit and just feel badly for these others? Really? I think we humans will ensure food goes where it is needed.
The only "power" anyone has over anyone else even now is the power they are given by their underlings, the people they are "lording it over". If people made that simple realization, the world would change overnight - they would simply stop acknowledging that power, and in doing so it would cease to exist. You see, "power" is in the acknowledgement of it - it's not "power" if no one cares. If "money is power", then stop giving them your money, and watch their entire world shrivel up and die.
And that's why, if you think consuming an herbal substance, for example, is ok, others will always leave you alone. They have no power over you. Right?
When one has more then they need they must fear something. If I owned a billion dollar company, I am going to make sure the people that got me there, get their share. From the worker on the floor first, and then go up from there. As far as politicians running around saying how we need to redistribute wealth, well as others have stated, give yours away first then we'll talk. In other words actions speak louder then words.
Does not imply trying?
Actually that's exactly what it meant. If you don't enter competitions you won't win. People who claim bad luck typically don't do things that lead to opportunity.
Our divorced unemployed family friend keeps moaning about his bad luck, observation of him and other people I know claiming bad luck has told me that they're own behaviour is what's lead them into trouble. One guy in particular keeps going on about how hard done by he is. Has lived at home unemployed from 18 to 40, being supported by parents until he was in his late thirties, no health problems that weren't due to his drinking and dope smoking. But apparently bad luck was the reason he's broke at 40.
spiritualzombie
beezzer
According to you, it is now treason to have more than you.
beezzer
And I call it how I see it.
No, you re-word it as you see fit. You don't argue with the truth because you can't, so you change the truth to be something you can argue with.
Shame on you.
Panic2k11
reply to post by Antigod
Does not imply trying?
Actually that's exactly what it meant. If you don't enter competitions you won't win. People who claim bad luck typically don't do things that lead to opportunity.
I said lack of trying and also that Live does not permit anyone to be static. It is obvious that not entering a competition will exclude you for any returns, what you seem to dismiss is that you don't win all competitions and that competing has costs.
This is predatory behavior 101, you only spend your resources pursuing targets you have a good chance to win.
Our divorced unemployed family friend keeps moaning about his bad luck, observation of him and other people I know claiming bad luck has told me that they're own behaviour is what's lead them into trouble. One guy in particular keeps going on about how hard done by he is. Has lived at home unemployed from 18 to 40, being supported by parents until he was in his late thirties, no health problems that weren't due to his drinking and dope smoking. But apparently bad luck was the reason he's broke at 40.
A simple competition does not translate well to our complex society, the concurrency and intermixing of variables is too vast to clearly define anyone. The best chance you have is in segregating those in top positions especially since they are a smaller set and share more characteristics amongst themselves. You can't evaluate a barrel of apples by a single one... Consider every steps on the life of a human being under our society and you are bound to see areas that are outside of the individual's control that will shape his path in life. Now consider the chances in comparison with someone that was helped, nurtured or guided toward the right decisions, not the same...
spiritualzombie
reply to post by nenothtu
This revelation that neocons are liberals or leftists I find extremely interesting, but very confusing, so please help me out.
These neocons (leftist/liberals) have been interviewed countless times on FOX News, which was thought to be right-wing conservative. So are you saying FOX News is actually leftist? Because these neocons are still loved by FOX News. Aren't they? Or have they since been disavowed?
So are conservatives who watch FOX News actually leftist liberals?
When did this happen? Did right wing conservatives know all along that Neocons like Kristol, Rumsfeld, Cheney, etc where actually leftists? If so, why did FOX News support them, unless FOX is also leftist? And all it's viewers leftist also?
Please make this make sense. I'm genuinely interested.
AlwaysIdeaMan
How do you "redistribute" respect? Appreciation? Self satisfaction? Friendship? Love? Fame? There is no trade, barter, work exchange, money. What motivates us will be our heart, what we WANT to do. There is no way to redistribute that. "Ideas per minute?" If somebody has no ideas, who cares???
Really? The starving artist working at McDumps has the choice to paint with paints they can't afford? With canvases they can't afford? In a studio they can't afford? No... Most people are working for the weekend when they CAN do what they want to do IF they can afford it. We all are trying to "get ahead, but I have news for you, only a very small fraction can get there.
That starving child is likely realizes what he has, eh? Um... What DOES he have?
Heh. You don't think all those people who now contribute $20 to charities (that pay themselves first and maybe 2% gets to the ones in need) because they can't afford to go feed them themselves but they do care, being freed to travel, arrange food shipments, and go help directly would sit and just feel badly for these others? Really? I think we humans will ensure food goes where it is needed.
And that's why, if you think consuming an herbal substance, for example, is ok, others will always leave you alone. They have no power over you. Right?
I said lack of trying and also that Live does not permit anyone to be static. It is obvious that not entering a competition will exclude you for any returns, what you seem to dismiss is that you don't win all competitions and that competing has costs.
This is predatory behavior 101, you only spend your resources pursuing targets you have a good chance to win.
A simple competition does not translate well to our complex society, the concurrency and intermixing of variables is too vast to clearly define anyone. The best chance you have is in segregating those in top positions especially since they are a smaller set and share more characteristics amongst themselves. You can't evaluate a barrel of apples by a single one... Consider every steps on the life of a human being under our society and you are bound to see areas that are outside of the individual's control that will shape his path in life. Now consider the chances in comparison with someone that was helped, nurtured or guided toward the right decisions, not the same...
The top 1% are supporting the top .0001%. The mindsets of the top 1% are a problem. They should be scared to support the top .0001% for fear of having their assets taken for supporting financial terrorism, fraud, intentionally misleading public through multiple news outlets.
beezzer
thesaneone
spiritualzombie
but it should be where we ALL win.
This is what irks me with some people, why should we all win? Should we all be winners even if we don't deserve it or earn it. Who chooses the losers? You?
Shhhhhh!
EVERYONE gets a trophy!
This country is full of self-made people who used their wits/talents to become wealthy.
Panic2k11
reply to post by Antigod
What ?!? Are you reading what I write or was the reply not intended to me ?
Its the second time I reply to you and you compliantly ignore what I stated... and go in a tangent...
I don't believe in luck at all (nor in magic).
I stand by what I said...
I said lack of trying and also that Live does not permit anyone to be static. It is obvious that not entering a competition will exclude you for any returns, what you seem to dismiss is that you don't win all competitions and that competing has costs.
This is predatory behavior 101, you only spend your resources pursuing targets you have a good chance to win.
A simple competition does not translate well to our complex society, the concurrency and intermixing of variables is too vast to clearly define anyone. The best chance you have is in segregating those in top positions especially since they are a smaller set and share more characteristics amongst themselves. You can't evaluate a barrel of apples by a single one... Consider every steps on the life of a human being under our society and you are bound to see areas that are outside of the individual's control that will shape his path in life. Now consider the chances in comparison with someone that was helped, nurtured or guided toward the right decisions, not the same...
If you don't feel like intelligently replying to what I post at least restrain yourself from writing nonsense without any relation to what I said previously...
PS: I wonder who was the lunatic that stared your post...edit on 2-2-2014 by Panic2k11 because: (no reason given)
poet1b
reply to post by beezzer
Yes, the truth about those who worship wealth, they think rich people should be above the law.
It is like the worship of royalty, many believe the rich should not be held to the same standards of justice as us mere peasants.
spiritualzombie
Time for a massive change. I vote for a mass redistribution of wealth.edit on 30-1-2014 by spiritualzombie because: (no reason given)