It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
marg6043
reply to post by Flatfish
Sorry to say this to you, but this the result of having a president that no only lies to the public, is ruling under executive orders and got us ACA.
marg6043
Any person with basic understanding of how our government works this days will not trust Obama and neither his policies he doesn't have a good reputation this days and neither the Federal government and corrupted agencies like the IRS, that remind me also how he has used that agency for his own personal agendas.
marg6043
No thanks, but you are welcome to try MyRA and let us know how well you do.
Flatfish
Apparently, if it's endorsed or sponsored by Obama, that's all the proof one needs to verify that it must be corrupt.
Secondly, President Obama has signed less executive orders than many, if not most, of his predecessors regardless of their political affiliation
Flatfish
Secondly, President Obama has signed less executive orders than many, if not most, of his predecessors regardless of their political affiliation and if I'm not mistaken,
LeatherNLace
reply to post by Flatfish
This can not be repeated enough:
Secondly, President Obama has signed less executive orders than many, if not most, of his predecessors regardless of their political affiliation
LeatherNLace
reply to post by Flatfish
This can not be repeated enough:
Secondly, President Obama has signed less executive orders than many, if not most, of his predecessors regardless of their political affiliation
Flatfish
I probably would if I were not already retired and not qualified to participate in the plan.
six67seven
LeatherNLace
reply to post by Flatfish
This can not be repeated enough:
Secondly, President Obama has signed less executive orders than many, if not most, of his predecessors regardless of their political affiliation
Perhaps its not the quantity of EOs that matter, but the desired or end result of the EO that matters
LeatherNLace
six67seven
LeatherNLace
reply to post by Flatfish
This can not be repeated enough:
Secondly, President Obama has signed less executive orders than many, if not most, of his predecessors regardless of their political affiliation
Perhaps its not the quantity of EOs that matter, but the desired or end result of the EO that matters
I'm not sure what you mean by "desired or end result". Here is a link to every executive order Obama has issued. Could you please review this list and provide specific examples and give a bit of description as to how the desired or end result is/will be negative?
en.wikipedia.org...
Throughout his presidency, Mr. Bush has made liberal use of his executive authority, using it to put his stamp on a range of hot-button policy issues.
marg6043
reply to post by Flatfish
No, you got it wrong ACA is only constitutional under TAX, my dear, it seems that forced commerce can only come under the term TAX this days, so taxes are easy to pass wait for the next mandate under TAX Mr. hope and change seems to think that forcing crap is good for the voters and TAX [payers in the nation this days.
That is why he is promising to create more middle class to keep taxing them to death, perhaps he thinks using his executive powers to push immigration with his pen will do that, who knows maybe 1% of the millions of illegals will be middle class while the rest will fall under the welfare system, and how can we forget that a government that can not manage a debt of 17 trillion dollars due to waste and abuse after 6 years of rule is going to be the entity I will trust with my retirement, and lord let me no get started with the IRS.
sorry that party affiliations have made your mind so closed to the realities of the crocks we call politicians this days.
Our political system is not the same as decades ago, now is nothing but corruption and the destruction of our nations due to greed and private corporate agendas.
Pray that you will retire at 65 and not by 69 or 70 like the crocks in congress has been trying to legislate for years.
At least my father got his SS at 62, I know that I probably will never see anything.
macman
reply to post by Flatfish
Flatfish
Apparently, if it's endorsed or sponsored by Obama, that's all the proof one needs to verify that it must be corrupt.
I was trying to at least give you a great job, for telling some truth.