It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Also, I believe I spoke about the untestable nature of God before. Test time. Test light. Test fire. You could probably tell me a lot about photons and things like this but have you ever scientifically tested any of these things? But yet you regard them as gospel.
Any test done would not produce any results as all are untestable. You can take the remnants of fire and theorize the products of combustion, which has been done. But any actual test done on fire itself would burn you.
You could theorize light and its methods, but could you test it scientifically in any meaningful way? It is clearly there. You live in an infinitely complexed, perfectly balanced world. You respond from an infinitely balanced and complex machine which makes it possible for you to type the words you type. If you want signs, they are literally all around you.
I can imagine that all the answers you seek have already been written on this thread
It is frustration when I am asked to repeat myself. This is not intelligent discourse. This seems to me like trolling. And as all are aware, you don't feed the trolls.
Anyone with a brain sees what I am saying. And you yourself didn't expound upon the scientific method(which I clearly demonstrated and eloquently described in detail) until I showed it to you. This shows maybe you don't know even the basics of the scientific method which I demonstrated in detail, omitting things that could be deduced without explanation.
I didn't utilize any scientific process to prove my deity.
I wanted to know if God was real(hypothesis). I then looked through many books to find one that was up to snuff and had touched my heart as being both unexplainable as to the knowledge it possesses about the seen world, and also the unseen world.(experiment). I started to implement these words into my everyday life and began to see His magnitude everywhere I looked.(application).
When it rains do you also run up to people and yell "Hey, your wet!"? You must be a joy to be around, and I mean that honestly. It would be a laugh riot. In fact it makes me want to write a comedy called "Incredibly Obvious Man" and it will be about a man, who all he does is run around and explain the incredibly obvious as if it has struck him by surprise. Like when a fire is burning he will run by and say "Hey thats hot" or when he falls he'll say "The ground is hard" or when he walks outside he'll say "The sky is big!" to the varying levels of annoyance of all those around him.
well, i'm not going to get into your argument with him, but i will say that being able to admit you might be wrong, takes an act of humility.
something most Christians do well to have, as pride is a cardinal sin.
In the context it is. Here is a thought experiment for yourself, who ironically is named after infinity. Try to imagine something that has no beginning and no end. It is difficult, as it goes against a finite creatures understanding.
So if you can have trouble even understanding a base level of Gods being, than one probably must go about it in a different way. The different way I am explaining is His Word(read it), His Creation(studied it), His Spirit(felt it).
This is my method, and seems sufficient for me. My love of science assisted in all but the last one. Is this clearly worded? Also, nothing can be after infinity as infinity is endless, therefore your motto does not make any sense.
But yet I try to explain myself. Just because you use big words, doesn't mean you use your brain. Keep trying though.
Jarring
reply to post by AfterInfinity
lol, sorry if that's what you got out of the conversation :|
one of the ten commandments is to not take the Lord's name in vain...
does sound a bit egocentric doesn't it? hmm, I don't think God is egocentric, but I wouldn't doubt it was an important subject.
Jarring
reply to post by AfterInfinity
you're extremely condescending, and I don't think a circle is the best model to describe infinity.
Jarring
reply to post by AfterInfinity
Well, there is sort of meta-reasoning behind it. If you were able to follow that commandment flawlessly, you wouldn't take anything in vain.