It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Where did all this wet stuff come from?

page: 4
11
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 06:11 PM
link   
Planets are formed by rocks and gases. As a planet cools these gases condensate which in he case of H2O creates water.



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 06:20 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


Deny history? There is no history in the bible? It's the accounts of something that supposedly happened said a group of men. There is nothing in history that actually points to any of it happening when they said it did. Seriously, 0 evidence aside from more holy texts that date to around the same time, and even the oldest don't date to near the time they claim anything happened.

Science is a neat little thing, it's based on facts and observations. Some comets, and other celestial objects have water trapped in them over many billions of years of those things slamming into the Earth we get the water we have today. The oceans became salty based on the salts already here, the water dissolved them.

It may seem like filling a swimming pool with a single drop out of an eye dropper at a time is a momentous task and may take you several months.

Now think of this in a larger scale, and make the time billions of years.

TADA, earth and her water.



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 06:23 PM
link   
reply to post by CranialSponge
 





So no, scientists are not completely writing off the "big flood" story like you're trying to assert.



This is not only showing how unreasonable you are. It's completely wrong.

I never said all Scientists.
edit on 27-1-2014 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 06:29 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


I'll continue to wait for your sourced link where scientists are saying there was a lack of water available on the earth prior to the biblical deluge.

No need to continue any further dialogue about anything else until we can at least get that valuable piece of information on the table first.

Cheers.



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 06:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Hijinx
 





Now think of this in a larger scale, and make the time billions of years.


Billions of years huh? Is that a fact?



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 06:35 PM
link   
reply to post by CranialSponge
 





I'll continue to wait for your sourced link where scientists are saying there was a lack of water available on the earth prior to the biblical deluge.



And why am I suppose to be looking for that again?
Science says there is a lack of waterto cover the whole earth even to this day. Does it not?
edit on 27-1-2014 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 06:37 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 





I never said all Scientists.


You sure didn't say "some" scientists either.




This is the Biblical account. science scoffs at and says is just a myth.


It's pretty clear that you are taking about science and scientists as a whole.

Your backpedaling and moving of the goal posts is so pathetic.........




And why am I suppose to be looking for that again?


Because it is a significant part of your premise?

Man you are a pathetic troll.
edit on 27-1-2014 by ProdigalSonofa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 06:41 PM
link   
reply to post by ProdigalSonofa
 





You sure didn't say "some" scientists either.



Correcto mundo. I didn't realise I'd be playing a game of silly semantics with anyone either. K?




Man you are a pathetic troll.


If that' s how you really felt you wouldn't still be here. So give me a kiss?
edit on 27-1-2014 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 06:51 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


You conveniently missed the other qoute that made it clear you were talking about science as a whole.

Very selective.




If that' s how you really felt you wouldn't still be here.


Well I tend to post as a reaction to things that irritate me so.........
edit on 27-1-2014 by ProdigalSonofa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 06:52 PM
link   
From the OP!




I believe a ton of history is discounted in
our time as myth. And I'm not shy in my convictions.


So what's not to understand?
And who is really trolling here?

edit on 27-1-2014 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 06:59 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 



Well, well, well... one of these threads is it?

You opened up your OP by generalising scientists/science itself. You seem to make no coherently linked points, and refuse to answer anyones' relevant questions? You like to dick people about by changing what you mean, but when others point it out, they're playing "childish semantics".

This website used to be great. It used to be a place where intelligent, mature adults could discuss topics at length, and in detail. Unfortunately thanks to people like you , half the threads posted are biblical BS. It's a pity your religious book of choice (they're all made up nonsense) has closed your mind so much, you can't even interact with normal people.

No matter though, just keep playing silly games on an online forum to massage your ego - your blind faith will be enough to convince your purportedly magic Jew god to let you in to 'heaven' with the rest of the idiots.


Tl;Dr. Your op is pointless because your mind is closed to discussion. You're a man-child who is doing nothing but pleasing himself online (probably to make up for how terriblly you feel your life has turned out).
Lastly, IS YOUR KEYBOARD BROKEN? or have you just decided that your way of typing (random indenting, spelling, and grammar) sis good enough for the rest of us English speakers?



edit on 27-1-2014 by Thundersmurf because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 07:00 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


Yes, it is, which is more than can be said for anything in your OP



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 07:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Thundersmurf
 


You're right this used to be a great sight where people didn't get attacked
for pointing out the lies that people are led to believe about what clearly
amounts to history. As recorded in the Bible and many other sources.
But I love it anyway.



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 07:05 PM
link   

I absolutely
know in my gut, science is wrong, to even think of these accounts, especially
the account in Genesis, as myths.



Well, there we have it everyone. All the answers lie in randy's gut. We'll just go with that instead of science. After all, what's more logical than a belief system formed from a mystic book? Certainly not geological records, that's for sure!
edit on 1-27-14 by paradox because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 07:07 PM
link   

randyvs
reply to post by Thundersmurf
 


You're right this used to be a great sight where people didn't get attacked
for pointing out the lies that people are led to believe about what clearly
amounts to history. As recorded in the Bible and many other sources.
But I love it anyway.


Ah, so now we can see that the point of this thread was not to genuinely ask where water came from and to research the answers, but to shove your pompous beliefs down people's throats in hopes for a reaction, and then play the victim.

You guys are always good at playing a victim aren't you?



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 07:22 PM
link   
reply to post by paradox
 


Any thing on topic?
I'm not seeing any rebuttles here so I guess my point is valid.
edit on 27-1-2014 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 07:38 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


What was your exact topic again?



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 08:06 PM
link   
reply to post by ProdigalSonofa
 


That millions of people around the world believe in extraterrestrial beings



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 08:10 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


And what is your shoe size?



posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 08:13 PM
link   

randyvs
reply to post by paradox
 


Any thing on topic?


If my direct responses to your posts are off topic, then your posts must off topic as well.

You don't take rebuttals into account. Not that rebuttals make any sort of a difference judging by your past here, so why pretend they matter? the thread is a joke and will be treated as such.



I'm not seeing any rebuttles here so I guess my point is valid.
edit on 27-1-2014 by randyvs because: (no reason given)


Argument from repetition. Argument from incredulity.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join