Media Under-covering Key Scientific Experiments

All the scientific research being done is being done without realtime updates. We need realtime updates.

If your warp drive is popular to be in the news, get a publicist!

If your beam of antimatter is the biggest in the world, tell me tommorrow... and the next and and the next.

If you are ten minutes away from the cure to cancer, let me know now not fifteen minutes from now!

There are too many scientific experiments being done that could play a significant role in our future with little to no media coverage. Where are the reporters?

They are off covering tea parties and space walks. The media is fueling a fire here. They are making us oblivious to the idea that scientific discoveries have and are about to change the world significantly. Why isn't the media on fringe with the fringe?

Dude, science is boring and stuff. Now what's happening with Justin Beiber?

There's your answer.

reply to post by ChefSlug


Not going to happen, science is a competitive world with focus on money (by findings and fame) no one will preemptively share data (that could be erroneous) before getting to a conclusion and fixed that in a paper (if a patent is not applicable first).

Competition and trade secrets. They can't jeopardise their paychecks. We will be getting the technology built into something expensive in the future or the newly designed drugs that treat cancer will come out as soon as they can figure a way to profit from it. To make drugs to treat cancer you need to know what causes it. They already know what causes these diseases but instead of telling us right out what it is they can sell us treatments and get rich.

Remember that all the money that goes for cancer research would stop if they told us how to avoid it. If they were to tell us how we could reduce the currents of heat flow on our house, we wouldn't need to insulate, the knowledge of how to trick heat from seeing cold is well known. It just has not been told to most people. those studying physics either know or can't comprehend it's application.

reply to post by rickymouse


You are so spot on! It is such a shame that "they" already know how to treat &
cure diseases yet they allow for so many to suffer. It's too bad there isn't some
kind of law against making people suffer when it is not necessary & so sad for
the person being treated as well as family & friends, especially when
all this could be avoided.

Cheers
Ektar

reply to post by ChefSlug


As far as promising cancer treatments go, stop government red tape by waiting until all the human trials and lab testing is complete for another 20 years. Let people who have lost all hope and exhausted treatments sign a liability waiver if they want to try any cancer research showing promising results. People shouldn't die without given every last chance for survival.

Ektar
reply to post by rickymouse

 

You are so spot on! It is such a shame that "they" already know how to treat &
cure diseases yet they allow for so many to suffer. It's too bad there isn't some
kind of law against making people suffer when it is not necessary & so sad for
the person being treated as well as family & friends, especially when
all this could be avoided.

Cheers
Ektar

I've been studying food chemistry for years now. It is an imbalance in chemistry that causes many diseases. Too many glutamates/glutamines/tyramines and you could have problems if the right minerals are not present. This one imbalance I am talking about can cause various different diseases. It is balancing this that is important. When the sensors on a cell are damaged from overconsuming these compounds, it leads to weakness and the weakness leads to problems also.

Our body cells need to communicate with our brain, this means proper signaling must occur. If the communication system is down, the white blood cells cannot know if a cell is cancer and destroy it. If you do not get enough of glutamates/tyramines/glutamines, then you cannot heal or make memories. Foods that hijack our cravings are a problem. Our bodies are so advanced that science cannot presently fix things unless the consumption of these foods is limited. There are side effects of treating these problems both with meds and foods that neutralize them.

Now these attractants are not toxic, they cause an imbalance in the body. If we consumed them once a week as a treat there would be little problem. I have to note that natural foods eaten out of moderation can also cause this. If you eat pineapple for three weeks straight it can imbalance things. If you eat coconut oil with it's mysteric oil too often it can change things. Not all changes are bad, some are beneficial....but they are still changes and it is important to know that new cravings should balance things. You cannot ignore these cravings, you need to analyze why they are happening and pay attention to what turns them off. If you have a salt craving you may say you are needing cashews because you like cashews. so on so forth across a multitude of different scenarios. Salt is cheaper than cashews. Sunflower seeds are cheaper than cashews too.

This subject is really complex. As you gain more wealth, you start to treat yourself to more of your favorite foods, ignoring the little health problems that are starting to pop up. Eyes don't focus fast enough, forget things more often, a lot of little seemingly not really important things like this that you just blow off as being normal. This is what is called being negatively effected by overindulgence in neurochemical producing foods. It won't usually kill you, it makes you more susceptible to a problem with proper communication of our cells over a long term. Most of these foods in moderation are good for you but the newly gained income changed your diet. This messes people up and they have to go to the doctors to get fixed. Is this reversible? sometimes, the longer you do this the longer it takes to remake the damaged cells.

So who is doing this. The chemists that create these chemicals or the people who push the recipes containing all these attractant foods. Moderation is the clue. This practice of using attractant chemistry to sell things is not new. It goes back thousands of years. Some of our evolution is based on usage of this chemistry, some people have evolved with these foods better than others. Their junk DNA properly informs them what is necessary to correct this, but the nutritionists say we should not eat this stuff sometimes. Parrots, saying what is told to them to say. I do not see anyone behind this, but I do see a lot of people that profit or earn a living from us being sick. This is the problem. Society has made medicine into big business. Society likes the high they get from eating these foods and if they try to fix the problem by stopping consuming them all together, they find they may have other problems that seem unrelated but aren't.

I can't blame the doctors or the pharma companies, they aren't making us eat this stuff. Food is a drug, taking too much of one drug is bad. It is let the buyer beware in America. Some people can eat more of one thing than another, based on their ancestors diets. Just don't believe completely in what this science is showing, they often do not think of adverse reactions that happen from diet changes. I have read tens of thousands of articles on food chemistry and am only just scratching the surface. Every day I read up on things trying to find neutralizing chemistry knowing that food is a multitude of chemicals. An orange has lots of chemicals in it, not just the ones they have named. Just like a bottle of wine has way more chemicals than just what they say. Wine has good and bad chemistry, not just the ones they try to say are good. Alcohol is not one of the bad ones, unless it is overconsumed.