It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
beezzer
reply to post by marg6043
This is what the government wants.
ownbestenemy
reply to post by neo96
Even the pathway to citizenship is tenuous via military service...that said, there needs to be reform, but nothing in which is being offered by the political class is sane or logical.
I didn't say "open the flood gates"; I said reformed.
Those that have broken the law to get here are treated with preferential treatment but those that go through the current process are mired in years of political red-tape.
President Barack Obama's opponents -- especially those working for the Border Patrol and in law enforcement -- claim the recent change in immigration policy is meant to seal his Latino voting base, especially those who are suspected of being legal or illegal aliens who are fraudulently voting in U.S. elections.
Statistical studies regarding illegal aliens and criminal activity are few and far between. But in a 2007 Government Accountability Office study of a sample population of 55,322 illegal aliens, analysts discovered that:
They were arrested at least a total of 459,614 times, averaging about 8 arrests per illegal alien. Nearly all had more than one arrest. Thirty-eight percent (about 21,000) had between 2 and 5 arrests, 32 percent (about 18,000) had between 6 and 10 arrests, and 26 percent (about 15,000) had 11 or more arrests. Most of the arrests occurred after 1990.
neo96
reply to post by Liquesence
I think they should be treated EXACTLY like Mexico treats their 'illegals'.
Under the Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony, punishable by up to two years in prison. Immigrants who are deported and attempt to re-enter can be imprisoned for 10 years. Visa violators can be sentenced to six-year terms. Mexicans who help illegal immigrants are considered criminals. Read more: www.washingtontimes.com... Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
marg6043
reply to post by Liquesence
Most of the illegal work force in the nation are indeed in the poverty line, that is why they are called importers of poverty, when these people become citizens they will not turn rich overnight, they will became a burden of the welfare system as they will be able to collect welfare on their extended families and even stop working whatever low pay jobs they have.
More burden on the productive hard working class.
I'm tired of people saying the US should do things like X country does things. Such an irrational argument.
neo96
reply to post by Liquesence
I'm tired of people saying the US should do things like X country does things. Such an irrational argument.
I fail to see the 'rational' in rewarding those who break the law.
Those who try to justify it are the ones being 'irrational'.
You would rather work in platitude and not actually debate the issue at hand then?
As with all "laws"; there are going to be those who do not adhere to it; so does reforming our criminal justice system suggest that we are "opening the flood gates" to ensuring that murderous villains take over the streets? Ridiculous argument? Nah, just placing your argument into context.
That's an entirely different argument.
It's irrational to want the US to be like other countries, THAT'S my point. Don't change the subject.
But maybe if the US made it easier for people to become citizens, the problem wouldn't exist as much.
In the United States last year, more than $120 billion was sent by workers to families abroad - making it the largest sender of remittances in the world. More than $23 billion went to Mexico, $13.45 billion to China, $10.84 billion to India and $10 billion to the Philippines, among other recipients.
he Immigration Act of 1924, or Johnson–Reed Act, including the National Origins Act, and Asian Exclusion Act (Pub.L. 68–139, 43 Stat. 153, enacted May 26, 1924), was a United States federal law that limited the annual number of immigrants who could be admitted from any country to 2% of the number of people from that country who were already living in the United States in 1890, down from the 3% cap set by the Immigration Restriction Act of 1921, according to the Census of 1890. It superseded the 1921 Emergency Quota Act. The law was aimed at further restricting the Southern and Eastern Europeans, among them Jews who had migrated in large numbers since the 1890s to escape persecution in Poland and Russia, as well as prohibiting the immigration of Middle Easterners, East Asians, and Indians. According to the U.S. Department of State Office of the Historian the purpose of the act was "to preserve the ideal of American homogeneity".[1] Congressional opposition was minimal.