Originally posted by Off_The_Street
dh says:
What would that prove to you, dh? That there is no such thing as a "chem-trail" conspiracy?
Or would you be forced to come up with some other modification to your hypothesis?
Let me know. If you're serious about using the existence of contrail lines before 1990 as "evidence" that there are no such thing as
"chem-trails", then I'll go out and find you some, okay?
I personally don't believe the existence of persistent contrails in parallel groupings or crossed or whatever proves or disproves anything, but if
you really want to use it as "evidence", I'll be glad to do your research for you.
Again, let me know.

[immediately enters dissembling mode- well I am British and Blair wears a particular type of stereotype with flair]
Very generous of you OTS - I have looked around for this sort of thing myself but without much success, but then I am ineffably lazy, and I think if
you take the right approach to idleness, i.e. that of a zealot, then you can add years to your life
Yup, most observers seem to date prevalence of chemtrails from various years in the mid-nineties on. So proper photographic evidence of the same
phenomena - that is, patterning, spreading, 'white-outs' from an earlier era would be substantive evidence.
I don't deny the existence of lingering and spreading contrails at certain temperatures and atmospheric conditions , and don't insist that a
contrail has to disappear at a few seconds interval from emission as some sample videos show - some do some don't For me, distinction between the two
possible effects might take some time of observation
You see, I'm employing a type of technology that you won't accept, a cloud or chembuster, as promoted by Don Croft, based through a long trail of
happenstance on the energetic findings of Wilhelm Reich, upon whom I've based my whole life perception from the age of fifteen. Now Reich's
philosophy says that Nazi Germany was created out of the will of a sexologically messed up generation of Germans, whose sexual neediness created
dependence on a Fuhrer - much the situation re-created today in the US, UK and many other nations - See 'The Mass Psychology of Fascism'
Um, the other element in this is the cell towers which are taken in some way to interact with the chemtrail umbrella and with us individually and as
community = this is dealt with as regards to individual cell towers by depositing towerbusters in the vicinity. This according to dispassionate
recordings on an EMF meter - favourite in this activity the Zapchecker - will sometimes take down the output or not. 'Gifting' cell towers with
towerbusters in areas that have a cloudbuster can produce apparently rapid reaction in sky-born phenomena
All I'm trying to say here is that it is much more difficult to distinguish locally between a contrail activity and a chemtrail activity when you
have devices dedicated to breaking up chemtrail formation
You see, I don't really need a chemtrail conspiracy, chemtrails are neither here nor there without a mechanism to fight back
If chemtrails didn't exist we'd need to invent them
That's what's so attractive about little creations of resin, metal shavings, quartz crystal, and maybe copper pipes
educate-yourself.org...
Don't need to believe the technology, the conspiracy, -just do the business and create the totem object and shamanistically put it out there with
your best intent and it's bound to work
All i'm saying is it's a holographic world and a hundred monkeys is enough to prove what's real is real
Hmm- holograms, that explains so much - one little part of a hologram contains the information relating to the whole - this is so much like the
inferrent/efferent DNA strand. Also incidentally the best explanation of some visual images from 9/11- an outgrowth of Project Bluebeam and all
So after a long dissembling - I warned you from the start - bring it on - some stark images of the skies pre-nineties of some chemtrail like phenomena
in the sky
Will you convince me? - well perhaps at least for the part of the show if not the whole performance
It would certainly add valuable information to the debate and I wish you would go for it
Best
dh