Russian MFI, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 24-11-2004 @ 04:55 PM by jetsetter
The Mig 1.44 design itself is not stealthy. It may have composites and RAM but that can be added to almost any fighter aircraft. The design of the F/A-22 itself is stealthy.


1.0 Stealth features of the F/A-22
Taking a look at the F/A-22, quickly reveals the fundamental principles of a stealthy design as discussed earlier.


2.0 Continuous curves
The F/A-22 uses a combination of different ways to keep radar waves from bouncing back to their origin. The most sophisticated system is the use of so-called continuous curvature.

Many of of the surface shapes of the F/A-22 are curves with constantly changing radii. These scatter radar beams in all directions instead of back to the radar source. There are no right angles on the exterior of the design.

In order to calculate the curves and the effect they have on radar reflections form any point in 3D space, requires a tremendous computing power.

The first plane using this technology
extensively is the B-2 stealth bomber, also known as the flying wing.

Since computer- and software development has sky-rocketed over the past 20 years, prediction models can now be calculated quite precisely ,taking in account radar reflection versus the shape of the plane, while supporting more naturally aerodynamic shapes.


3.0 Planform alignment
The second way to keep radar waves from returning to the sending antenna, the leading and trailing edges of the wing and tail have identical sweep angles (a design technique called planform alignment).

The fuselage and canopy have sloping sides. The vertical tails are canted. The engine face is deeply hidden by a serpentine inlet duct and weapons are carried internally.


4.0 Saw-toothed edges
The F/A-22 has a low height triangle appearance from the front. This physical cross sectional view ensures a small signature from the front and low observability touches such as paint and materials, as well as little "W" shapes where straight lines might have appeared, all tend to break up the signature by absorption or redirection.

The "W" shapes are found at numerous places on the stealth aircraft. For instance, in the forefront of the cockpit glass, there is a very apparent "W" shape. This reduces the radar energy reflected during a head-on pass to the radar emitter. The "W" shape is also found on landing gear doors, engine inlets and outlets, as well as other openings.


5.0 Engine nozzles
Reduction of radar cross section of nozzles is also very important, and is complicated by high material temperatures.

The approach taken at Lockheed is to use ceramic materials.

The ceramics may be either lightweight, parasitic sheets mounted on conventional nozzle
structures or heavier structural materials forming saw-toothed edges.


6.0 Cockpit
The pilot's head, complete with helmet, is a major source of radar return. This effect is amplified by the returns of internal bulkheads and frame members. The solution is to design the cockpit so that its external shape conforms to good low radar cross section design rules, and then plate the glass with a film similar to that used for temperature control in commercial buildings. Here, the requirements are more stringent: it should pass at least 85% of the visible energy and reflect essentially all of the radar energy. At the same time, one would prefer not to have noticeable instrument-panel reflection during night flying.


7.0 Antennas
On-board antennas and radar systems are a major potential source of high radar visibility for two reasons. One is that it is obviously difficult to hide something that is designed to transmit with very high efficiency, so the so-called in-band radar cross section is liable to be significant. The other is that even if this problem is solved satisfactorily, the energy emitted by these systems can normally be readily detected. The work being done to reduce these signatures is classified.


8.0 Paint scheme
In order to make the F/A-22 disappear for the human eye on the ground, when in flight, special camouflage schemes have been developed. This way the plane will blend with the background sky as much as possible viewed from the bottom and disappear in the ground texture when seen from above.

9.0 Conclusion
The result of all these as well as a number of un-disclosed or non mentioned measures is the F/A-22's BVR capability, meaning that it can detect, engage and kill an opponent fighter, while staying invisible itself.

All from www.f-22raptor.com...

[edit on 11/24/04 by jetsetter]


reply posted on 25-11-2004 @ 05:22 PM by ExD

Jun 10 2004 4:06PM
Russian MIG to resume multi-role tactical fighter program
MOSCOW. June 10 (Interfax) - The Russian MIG aircraft building corporation decided to resume the fifth generation multi-role tactical fighter program (codenamed Project 1.44).

"The director general and designer general of our company made up his mind to continue the work on the 1.44 aircraft program," Andrei Karasev, Deputy Designer General and First Deputy Director General of MIG's Engineering Center, said at the MIG presentation to State Duma members, held in Moscow Thursday.

He also said that all the technological solutions pertaining to the engine, aerodynamics and aircraft systems are still far from obsolete.

As to the avionics, which has been developing intensively in the past years, it should be replaced. "The old avionics is no good now, of course. So, let us concentrate the resources on it, as the aircraft as a flying vehicle is ready," Karasev said.

He maintained that the Mikoyan Engineering Center was tasked to resume the tests of Project 1.44 by the year-end.



" For today the plane-demonstrator 1.44 has executed only two test flights. Within several years because of problems of financing of work under program MFI practically were not conducted. Now the decision to renew test " is accepted, - director of department of the information and public relations RSK "MiG " Jury Chervakov has told. It informed, that now there is a check of all systems and units of the plane 1.44 that up to the end of year to begin practical test flights of this fighter.

By J.Chervakova's words, (the project 1.44) is planned to use the experimental plane as flying laboratory for working off of perspective design decisions which will be demanded at creation perspective is export-focused a fighter.

" By the plane 1.44 carrying out of tests on working off of separate problems in interests of a perspective fighter, and also new updatings of a multipurpose fighter MiG - 29M1/M2 is planned ", - J.Chervakov has told.

It has noted, that " renewal of works on preparation for carrying out letnyh tests of the plane under the project 1.44 does not mean continuation of works on a theme of creation MFI ".


Well, MiG Corporation recovering from downfall. The orders on hand for the year has increased from 1.4 to 2.6 billion dollars, and by 2008, it is intended to extend it to 6 billion dollars. Andrey Karasev named as most prospective for Russian and foreign air forces such RSK MiG aircraft as the MiG-29K and MiG-29KUB and the MiG-29SM and MiG-29SMT – fighters produced earlier are being upgraded to this level, the MiG-29M/M2 are completely new and the most modern airplanes of the family, which will be delivered to customers from 2005-2006, and also the MiG-AT new generation combat training airplane and MiG-31 interceptor, experimental design work on its completion is being performed in the interests of the Russian Federation air force.


reply posted on 26-11-2004 @ 12:57 AM by engineer
Originally posted by Dima
oh yea, last thing, first shot doesn't mean u have first kill hu ever said thatu can still maneuver away, and ECM doesn't work that well(i have said it multiple times, 12% success rate)

AIM 120's are very effective missiles. AMRAAM has scored combat victories over the skies of Iraq, Bosnia and Kosovo. The missile was first used in combat on 27 December 1992 when an F-16C used it to shoot down an Iraqi MiG-25 over a no-fly zone in Iraq. The missile was used in a head-on shot at a range of about 3 miles, the two aircraft closing at about 800 mph. A second shot was on 17 January 1993, an F-16 shooting down an Iraqi MiG-29.

Those were the older versions, the new C version is even better. It has also proven effective at shooting down cruise missiles.

An aircraft will not dodge a missile that is traveling at Mach 4 and can pull 20G's. Not unless the pilot is damn lucky. ECM may or may not work, it depends on the circumstances, but the AMRAAM has a "home on jam" function, so a jamming aircraft will not automatically get away from the missile.

As to the cost of the F-22, of course they are expensive right now, when program costs are only spread among 40 or so AC. When full rate production is in place, the unit costs will decrease accordingly. At the current planned production of 276 AC, unit costs will be around 90 Million per copy. If additional units are produced for the RAF or RAAF, the unit cost will be further reduced.

[edit on 26-11-2004 by engineer]


reply posted on 26-11-2004 @ 06:00 PM by khruschev
Originally posted by Dima
the price will not decrease, it anything, it will increase, just like the price of all american aircraft have over the past few years
[...]
after the F/A-22 comes out, actually it will be slightly cheaper, but after a year, its price will go up
i have also heard that it will cost close to 150 million, and some indicate 250 million


Dima, please provide any support for your views.

Try and research why the price of American aircraft increases and that of ours decreases... Americans put new equipment onboard and it makes it more expensive, on the other hand we make equipment changes only for use in Russia, and that means that its price is not revealed since we are pretty good at keeping secrets.
A question for you, why do you think that F/A-22's price will decrease only for one year? How do you know it will go up? If you want your idea to be taken seriously, you should really try and provide some facts about what you say and not just provoke people around. I appreciate you supporting our country, but if you do it in these way it might leave a negative impression on some of the members.

Where did you find the price of $250 000 000? I would highly appreciate information on that one, since according to info we have it is supposed to be much lower.
____________

Someone said F/A-22 would see MiG-31M first... Well, MiG has a better radar than Raptor, which has a longer range. On the other hand, Raptor is stealthy so it will be harder to get track of it. Result: They are going to see each other at more or less same time, and it will be beyond the missile range.


reply posted on 26-11-2004 @ 07:24 PM by engineer
Originally posted by khruschev
Someone said F/A-22 would see MiG-31M first... Well, MiG has a better radar than Raptor, which has a longer range. On the other hand, Raptor is stealthy so it will be harder to get track of it. Result: They are going to see each other at more or less same time, and it will be beyond the missile range.

Perhaps. The Mig-31M has a very good radar, one of the best, but it is old technology compared it to the AN/APG-77. Besides, the Zaslon-M program was cancelled anyway along with the N014, so we're comparing a production radar with one that will not see production. And the AN/APG-77's range is not published, so how do you know that the Zaslon-M has a longer range?
The Low Probability of Intercept (LPI) capability of the radar defeats conventional RWR/ESM systems. The AN/APG-77 radar is capable of performing an active radar search on RWR/ESM equipped fighter aircraft without the target knowing he is being illuminated. Unlike conventional radars which emit high energy pulses in a narrow frequency band, the AN/APG-77 emits low energy pulses over a wide frequency band using a technique called spread spectrum transmission. When multiple echoes are returned, the radar's signal processor combines the signals. The amount of energy reflected back to the target is about the same as a conventional radar, but because each LPI pulse has considerably less amount of energy and may not fit normal modulation patterns, the target will have a difficult time detecting the F-22.
More on the F-22 Avionics suite:
www.globalsecurity.org...

There were only a handful of Mig 31M's produced, and it doesn't seem likely that they will ever go into serial production. So the chances of an encounter are not exactly high, since they will not be exported, and the US is not going to strike Russia. Even so, the Raptor has an altitude advantage, and reflected signals from the radar antenna will be directed up, so they will not be returned to their source. The F-22 also has systems to defeat passive surveillance and targeting systems, so it's not going to be an easy AC to get a lock on.

As to the missiles, the R-37 has a longer range, but the Raptor's ECM suite is designed to confound the missile's targeting radar. And we know how effective the AMRAAMs are from the encounters in the Balkans and Iraq.

So far I haven't seen anything that leads me to believe that any Mig will be an even match for an F-22.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 16 days ago with 0 member flags