It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Anomalies

page: 12
6
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 18 2014 @ 07:17 AM
link   
a reply to: hgfbob



so tell me ALL ABOUT this NEW phenomenon of thermal expansion that works at LOW TEMPS to REMOVE....

105 vertical feet of LOAD BEARING continuous vertical support columns....

You keep arguing the same point in different threads.
Yacking on this websight is akin to a bunch of winos under the bridge debating who makes the best hamberger. pointless


I suggest you drop your mouse and drive to any local university.
Talk to the professor(s) in the engineering departments.
Then come back and tell us what they said.

You just can't force 99.999% of the US experts to tow the OS line.

The simple fact is you are mistaken in your beliefs.




posted on Jul, 19 2014 @ 02:43 AM
link   
a reply to: samkent




You keep arguing the same point in different threads.


I'm not arguing...I am posting facts from the official NIST scientific investigation......you people are arguing without providing support for your contradictions to the facts I post.




local university.
Talk to the professor(s) in the engineering departments.


like MIT.....U Lowell, both very close to me.......and guess what, both of which I have friends at. There is NOTHING I post that goes against TAUGHT science......EXCEPT, the hypothesized claims of the OS PUSHED as truth.





You just can't force 99.999% of the US experts to tow the OS line.


well, when that 100% -1 of experts are gonna change physics just for that one day, WITHOUT providing any scientific white-paper evidence of how and why.........you tell me......then you can post these 'experts', [NOT tied to the fingers of Government], whom will put their professional reputation on the line to support a claim of "FIRST TIME, never before seen physics phenomenon", without any sort of peer reviewable data to support that claim.






The simple fact is you are mistaken in your beliefs.



I have NOT posted beliefs.....I have posted FACTS!!!

deal with it and PROVE THEM WRONG!



posted on Jul, 19 2014 @ 03:27 AM
link   
a reply to: samkent




Yacking on this websight is akin to a bunch of winos under the bridge debating who makes the best hamberger. pointless


?pointless?....uhm......got you, 'people', going huh.

I am just an average American whom is fed up with the bull....which can be UNDENIABLY shown using their own facts. I read the NIST report.....I quote the NIST report.

why can't you quote it for science and facts?



new topics
 
6
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join