It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Then I let disco suck me into a sniping match
Sremmos80
Then I let disco suck me into a sniping match
I'm not sure why you blame me, or indeed characterise my responses to you as part of a sniping match. I simply refuted your misconceptions
creating a huge intel operation
that Osama bin Ladin was in Iraq, or that this was claimed
that the US was not interested in finding WMDs, just the means of their production
that an agency that can get its navy to bomb their own HQ, blow up the WTC, plant DNA and fake crash sites, and disappear planeloads of people, can't stick a few tins of biological agents or a missile in a desert
that the US didn't care about its reputation or power in the world
By the way have you noticed how Russia has implied that its invasion of Crimea is justified by US precedent in Iraq?
So you need to get a bit better at whatever it is you're doing to change that.
shouting at people on an internet message board is doing anything other than bolstering your self esteem.
hgfbob
actually, it seems YOU need to educate yourself to even understand what I am talking about. I am posting facts from 2005 NIST and known taught science. What do I need to get "better" at?
so tell me, what is preventing you from discussing that ACTUAL day of 9-11????
You need to get better at advancing your claims.
Because at the moment the world proceeds as though I'm right and you're wrong.
The mainstream has largely accepted what I say and looks at your views - which it rarely does - with a sort of humorous contempt
You need to get better at advancing your claims
What truthers then do is take these anomalies and a preconceived notion that 9/11 was a “inside job” and put them together.
As such for my logical mind I can only say with confidence that the “official theory” must be the correct one as it is the one that can explain most of the facts.
"No conclusive evidence was found to indicate that pre-collapse fires were sever enough to have a significant effect on the microstructure that would have resulted in weakening of the steel structure." NIST NCSTAR 1-3C, p. 235
no evidence the type of joining methods, materials, or welding procedures used was improper NIST 1-3 p.99
recovered bolts were stronger than typical. NIST 1-2 p.133
"no core column examined showed temp. above 250C" NIST 1-3 6.6.2
NCSTAR1-3 7.7.2 "because no steel was recovered from WTC7,it is not possible to make any statements about it's quality"
NCSTAR 1A 3.6] "This free fall drop continues for approximately 8 stories, the distance traveled between t=1.75s and t=4.0s...constant, downward acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was *9.8m/s^2*, equivalent to the acceleration of gravity."
NICSTAR 1A 4.3.4] Global Collapse..."The entire building above the buckled column region moved downward in a single unit, as observed, completing the global collapse"
NCSTAR1A p.39/130
"the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."
"the phenomenon that we saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building down was really thermal expansion, which occurs at lower temperatures."
when it comes to 9/11 even those of us who believe the official narrative should accept that we do not know everything that happened that day
Now they present an “alternative theory” based on these anomalies
I'm not duty-bound to provide you with any kind of discussion.
originally posted by: hgfbob
uhm....this is YOUR THREAD!!!!!
in other words.....you will lie, and when confronted with FACT showing the LIE...you turn mute.
I'm beginning to see why you fall for this stuff. You don't even check the most basic details.
"No conclusive evidence was found to indicate that pre-collapse fires were sever enough to have a significant effect on the microstructure that would have resulted in weakening of the steel structure." NIST NCSTAR 1-3C, p. 235
As I have pointed to Bob, in the next paragraph they explain that they had very limited amounts of samples to work from in the fire zones and no conclusions should be drawn from this.
"the phenomenon that we saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building down was really thermal expansion, which occurs at lower temperatures."
"free fall acceleration can ONLY occur when there is NO STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS BELOW IT"
NCSTAR 1A 3.6] "This free fall drop continues for approximately 8 stories, the distance traveled between t=1.75s and t=4.0s...constant, downward acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was *9.8m/s^2*, equivalent to the acceleration of gravity."
NICSTAR 1A 4.3.4] Global Collapse..."The entire building above the buckled column region moved downward in a single unit, as observed, completing the global collapse"
NCSTAR1A p.39/130
"the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."
there really is no hard evidence as to how exactly the hijackers entered the cockpits
and as I have repeatedly explained to Canty.....putting in a disclaimer AFTER THE FACT because the scientific investigation does not go your way, does what for you?
It keeps conspiracy theorists from quoting your report out of context for their own agenda.