 |
|
Topic started on 21-11-2004 @ 02:23 PM by fusion360
|
I was wondering this for a while so I thought I could get some opinion on it. Could the president be arrested for war crimes and geneva convention
violations. Other countries leaders have gone down and been arrested, could it even be considered possible in America?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 02:25 PM by MaskedAvatar
|
Anything is possible, but the incumbent "president" has signed more EOs as escape clauses from more crimes than any other US leader in the nation's
history.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 02:29 PM by neonine
|
It is quite possible that he could be charged but I doubt it. The only country that would is France and as soon as they made the accusations they
would flake after we threatened them or we could hold there Israel problem against them
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 02:30 PM by marg6043
|
Text Could Mr. Bush be arrested?

I agree with MaskedAvatar, he has made sure that he or Cheney can not.
And by the way can you arrest God?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 02:30 PM by Quest
|
Sure other countries could arrest bush. Or course that would mean instant war with the US. I'm not sure any country would want that.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 02:32 PM by fusion360
|
Could this country however or the UN arrest its own president and for it to be legal?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 02:35 PM by DJFiyaaBl8
|
It might be, ut if he wasarested he would be on free foot in no time because the us has always a way to free him, if it is with brute force or
economic things there is no way he would be prosicuted
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 02:59 PM by fusion360
|
Perhaps in a foregin country, how about the UN? Could they charge him possibly on war crimes.
I doubt they would, but its a hypothetical thought thats a what if kinda situation.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 03:05 PM by dnero6911
|
"A kingdom divided against itself will most certainly fall"
You're all in big big trouble. Soon .. Real soon, .... Nope not yet.. you'll know when.
Could Bush be arrested/charged by the UN........
well thats like asking
Would Satan choke the pope with his own rosary......
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 03:09 PM by ShadowXIX
|
It could be done but it would pretty much mean someone would have to do what the US did to Saddam. You would have to invade the US and go get Bush.
Good luck
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 03:11 PM by Majic
|
If by "arrested" you mean "taken into custody", that will be the day.
If by "accused, tried and convicted in absentia", that has already been done countless times right here on ATS.
Somehow, I don't think SkepticOverlord will be showing up at the White House to drag Bush off to the hoosegow anytime soon, however.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 03:22 PM by Warpspeed
|
Shadow is right.
Should some country attack America on the grounds that it has weapons of mass destruction, and it's leader is corrupt and unfit to lead ? Should
another country liberate America from it's leadership and kill anyone that objects ?
No, it is up to Americans themselves to put things right. Either with the ballot box, the law, or the gun.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 03:33 PM by dnero6911
|
Have you guys ever seen this before? LoL
Did he Mean it?
or enter the link directly into your "Open URL Link" in your Movie viewer.
atsmov...:atsmov@192.168.0.101/bush.wmv
[edit on 21/11/04 by dnero6911]
[edit on 21/11/04 by dnero6911]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 07:43 PM by fusion360
|
Originally posted by Warpspeed
Shadow is right.
Should some country attack America on the grounds that it has weapons of mass destruction, and it's leader is corrupt and unfit to lead ? Should
another country liberate America from it's leadership and kill anyone that objects ?
No, it is up to Americans themselves to put things right. Either with the ballot box, the law, or the gun. 
When it all comes down to it, the mightiest army wins. And all countries still have a fair way to go to catch up to the US might. Domestically could
he be charged however for war crimes, if it were to be brought up by a prosecutor?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 07:46 PM by dh
|
He oughta be
And for once I'd hold my opposition to capital punishment aside
Unless we could find him a useful job to do
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 09:19 PM by Intelearthling
|
On what violations would he be charged with? I'm not wanting opinions of the left, I want hard evidence of any violations!
If he violated any international laws, I think that the world and the U.S. would know that and he would be charged.
As far as I'm concerned, if having a back-bone is a crime, then he's guilty as hell!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 09:39 PM by mockan
|
He could be charged of course, but who would take him into
custody? Like Kissinger, he would just have to stay out of
countries where he might be arrested. For example
Kissinger can't be promised immunity from arrest in Chile,
Argentina, France, Brazil.. many Asian countries, even Britain.
When Bush is no longer president he would be foolish to
visit ANY Middle East country...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 09:48 PM by elaine
|
Nope, he'll never be arrested. Maybe, as some others mentioned, another country might want him arrested but they'd never get him.
Why ask if he can be arrested? He's been voted in, he has a mandate, and he's in absolute control. He is unstoppable as long as the majority of
Americans wish him to be where he is.
He is in charge of the most powerful country in the world and who would dare try to arrest him anyway?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 09:52 PM by MaskedAvatar
|
Here are the violations of the government headed by George W. Bush:
International Crimes as defined by the
International Criminal Court
The following acts are crimes coming within the jurisdiction of the
Tribunal for which there shall be individual responsibility:
(a) Crimes against Peace:
namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or
assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing:
(b) War Crimes:
namely, violations of the laws or customs of war . Such violations include, but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment or
deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of
prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns or
villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity:
(c) Crimes against Humanity:
namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population,
before or during the war, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the
jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated ...
You could fill this Topic with hunderds of others besides those defined by the International Crimes Court.
Deny ignorance, even if you are a Bush sycophant.
[edit on 21-11-2004 by MaskedAvatar]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 10:11 PM by elaine
|
Good try Masked Avatar. But you see, none of those crimes you list really matter according to the majority of American voters.
They'll want proof of all of it and even if there is real, solid proof there would be some "moral" reason why he did these crimes or it would be
put down to more leftist propaganda, or heck, they'd just ignore it all.
Sorry, but we gotta take a ride on the Bush train to hell, whether we like it or not. The election bought our tickets.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |