Fire in Water by NASA

Referred to as Supercritical Water.

www.youtube.com...

Strange stuff, but must have a number of usages.

reply to post by Frankinpillow

Interesting because this man, John Kanzius, was able to ignite salt water using radio frequencies.

He was to meet with "government officials" including the DOD in regards to his breakthrough. Soon after, he died of cancer and his discovery which was touted as the "most remarkable water science discovery in a century" was never heard of again.

Well, until now.

We're being told that the mechanics are different but seems coincidentally similar.

Was not aware of this, very fascinating. Imagine planets where this is the norm due to pressure and temperatures.

reply to post by gladtobehere


Salt is actually a problem in this technology, so this must have zero bearing on the tech you spoke of.

gladtobehere
He was to meet with "government officials" including the DOD in regards to his breakthrough. Soon after, he died of cancer and his discovery which was touted as the "most remarkable water science discovery in a century" was never heard of again.

Sure it was. It turns out to be a fairly inefficient way of causing electrolysis. Kanzius was using a stock h-field diathermy machine he had stripped out and stuck into a box so it looked more home brew, by the way.

Well, until now.

We're being told that the mechanics are different but seems coincidentally similar.

What's similar? Other than water being involved, there are no similarities.

reply to post by gladtobehere


there is absolutely no link between super critical water and the claim you cite [ other than the use of water ]

your claim alledgedly occurred @ room temp and 1 atm pressure under bombardment by radio waves

the nasa " super critical water " is pressuresised and heated then reacted with a hydrocarbon

do you spot the critical differences ?