It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Who Was Really Behind the 9/11 Attacks?

page: 3
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 05:11 AM
link   

crazyewok
As south park says " A bunch of pissed of Muslims"


Sure the US goverment may has "let" it happen, through incompetence and possibly due to the administrations intentions.

But im pretty sure it was carried out and planned by Al Queda.


Negligence? What if NATO nurished funded and pawed the way for alquaeda going as far as disarming fighter squadrons on the East coast and disabling the chain of command ?




posted on Feb, 9 2014 @ 12:33 PM
link   
It was carried out by those listed in the Offical 9/11 report.

However, maybe someone needs to be held accountable for how this was not stopped. The most secure nation on earth got dealt a huge blow by people known to them in part.

The offical report stands - but some embarrassment may of caused the US gov to alter certain details.



posted on Feb, 9 2014 @ 12:58 PM
link   

crazyewok
As south park says " A bunch of pissed of Muslims"


Sure the US goverment may has "let" it happen, through incompetence and possibly due to the administrations intentions.

But im pretty sure it was carried out and planned by Al Queda.


I think it was the same club that did Kennedy and most of all the other federal scams on a government level.



posted on Mar, 1 2014 @ 05:15 AM
link   
reply to post by DeadSeraph
 





So who was ultimately responsible?


well, once this 'truly' gets into light, you won't have to linger upon that question.

there will be MORE than enough 'finger pointing', 'deal-making' to get to the "whom"......

specially showing the FACT of 2005 NIST NOT finding ANY supporting SCIENTIFIC evidence of HOW the three buildings fell on 9-11...

and then 2008 NIST, IGNORING their own science to MAKE UP NEW science they REFUSE to prove.....

care to tell me bout Shyam Sunder and 2008 NIST HYPOTHESIS crews new number one hit..."WE DON'T HAVE TO PROVE a DAMN THING"! that we sing.....

2005 NIST SCIENTIFIC investigation found.....

"No conclusive evidence was found to indicate that pre-collapse fires were sever enough to have a significant effect on the microstructure that would have resulted in weakening of the steel structure." NIST NCSTAR 1-3C, p. 235

no evidence the type of joining methods, materials, or welding procedures used was improper NIST 1-3 p.99

recovered bolts were stronger than typical. NIST 1-2 p.133

"no core column examined showed temp. above 250C" NIST 1-3 6.6.2

NCSTAR1-3 7.7.2 "because no steel was recovered from WTC7,it is not possable to make any statements about it's quality"


"NIST did not test for the residue from explosives or accelerants" wtc. nist. gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006. htm


yet for SOME UNKNOWN reason, the 2008 NIST is allowed to *IGNORE* their own scientific investigation, and claim fire not only caused collapse, but did so as *NO OTHER* building has done before, stated by Shyam Sunder at NIST technical briefing
vimeo.com...

Shyam Sunder, all through the Q&A section of the video stating, ....."brand new event"..."new phenomenon"..."there has *NEVER* been a collapse like WTC7".

and the only supporting evidence they have are computer models which they *REFUSE* to release the data that *TELLS* the models what to do...WHY?
*ONE*, that will show them the fraud they are, and *TWO*,because they have a Presidential Executive Order stating they don't have to prove what ever they claim.



....so.....is that your final answer?



posted on Mar, 1 2014 @ 05:05 PM
link   

projectbane
It was carried out by those listed in the Offical 9/11 report.

However, maybe someone needs to be held accountable for how this was not stopped. The most secure nation on earth got dealt a huge blow by people known to them in part.

The offical report stands - but some embarrassment may of caused the US gov to alter certain details.


Yup 19 guys with box cutters accomplished the attack..

MAYBE?!?!?! Some one should be held accountable for how the attack was not stopped?!?!?!
Seriously? There should be no grey area AT ALL in that area, the gross criminal negligence that was shown and not addressed is the smoking gun IMO. Field level agents were pulled off cases and told to let it go...
People died and no one got their hands stained.... it is disgusting

Lol I love when people post that they are ok with the Gov altering details to save face or save the embarrassment... And we are the ones that are disrespecting the families of the ones lost that day.



new topics

top topics
 
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join