reply to post by kloejen
Thanks for ah clarifying. He couldn't seem to make up his mind! Probably did it on purpose.
Interesting to see Cheney talking about links to Saddam Hussein and Iraq without offering any corroborative evidence of any kind that any such linkage
existed. Just talk up those talking points and let the people make the connection for themselves..
They never did make officially make the case as promised by Colin Powell, nor did they ever officially charge Bin Laden or name him among the FBI's
most wanted in connection with September 11th, 2001.
There's also a significant tomb of public record info showing that the patsy hijackers were tracked closely, while blocking all attempts at an earnest
investigation, to keep them on the loose and in the wild under observation. It may have even been dated according to the codename "the big wedding".
They appeared to know in advance it's very hour
by their behavior and conduct that morning, until it was all over at just shortly after 10:00.
Everyone who was involved received a promotion thereafter, as well.
I think that future history looking back on this event will come to see and record it in a way that discards the OS as fundamentally untrue,
particularly when the narrative in regards to flight 93 is examined very carefully as it relates to the cell phone record from that aircraft, not just
the "seat-back" phone record, but also the cell phone record.
In the context of this aspect that resides at the very center of the crux of the OS narrative, of important note for any 9/11 researcher or concerned
citizen, is the call recorded on her husband's answering machine, by CeeCee Lyles
, flight attendant, which although it isn't indicated whether
it was a cell phone or an alleged airphone, her second call a little while later to her husband did come from her cell phone.
Her personal effects, allegedly recovered from the crash site..
It's got to be THE most sinister and wicked thing i've ever discovered in years of researching and examining what actually took place on September
11th, 2001, because it (the cell phone record) proves, in absolutely no uncertain terms (because of the corresponding status of those flights at the
time the calls were made) that those cell phone calls were and can only have been, when the record is taken together, made/placed from the
(not at altitude and high speed).
Yes, under some sort of coersion &/or false pretenses, as a type of "play" or enactment, or in short a "frame".. to create the desired narrative,
however difficult it is to imagine just barbarism and callous, uncaring wickedness and evil.
Scroll half way down this flight 93 wiki link,
to the player on the right hand side under her name CeeCee Lyles, put your head phones on, turn up the volume and listen very VERY carefully to her
call when framed within the context that all such calls cannot have been made at altitude and speed, either with such clarity or for a sustained
period of time (see September 11 documentary link in my signature for more), whereby most of them came from "flight 93".
Both the 9/11 Commission as well as the Moussaoui Trial, totally botched the cover up of the cell phone record
, the 9/11 Commission simply
describing a mix of seat-back and cell phones without differentiating between the two in terms of which was which, and the Moussaoui Trial simply
omitting the entire record altogether with the exception of all but two, in spite of the record from the FBI interviews in the wake of the event with
the recipients of those calls, where it was confirmed, as well as a voluminous public record including MSM interviews that indeed they were cell phone
calls and not just alleged airphone, something like 10-15 such calls in total.
Although this requires more investigation and research, right on the face of it it's absolutely absolutely damning to the OS at the crux of it's
central narrative, as far as i can tell.
If Sherlock Holmes was with us he'd take a puff on his pipe and announce that those calls can only have been made from the ground, giving more context
and framing to the particular delivery by that poor young lady CeeCee Lyles who in the final analysis appears to have outsmarted the perps, from what
i call tell, informing us all as to her situation while also, sadly, making a final appeal to "them", indirectly, both, at the same time. That's
pretty smart right there if you ask me, to come up with that approach.
This is sitting there in the middle of the public record.
That's just terrible.
Unlike the WTC destruction which was "unimaginable" (Zelikow, pre-911) and unfathomable, completely lacking a way to describe it's horror and
destruction (Zelikow also, paraphrased slightly) - this is deeply personal. Thank you CeeCee Lyles for telling the world and for making it crystal
clear with no ambiguity. Thank you for letting us know in the way you delivered your message. We're very sorry too, and it's not all for naught once
recognized, so thank you for having the courage and the genius to do what was right in a terrible predicament, by saying it directly, however
surreptitiously in that final whisper.
edit on 22-1-2014 by NewAgeMan because: (no reason given)