It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
PhotonEffect
How do we know for sure that those animals that are known to be self-aware are not capable of abstracting? Like great apes, dolphins, & elephants for instance. Or even, the non-mammalian, magpie, which is considered one of the most intelligent animals in the world and is also known to be self-aware.
I wonder if this elephant knows what he is painting...
saneguy
Sorry, I wasn't clear. Animals do abstract with their various nervous systems and senses just like humans, however, they cannot know that they do. To know this you need to have science.
PhotonEffect
How can we possibly know for sure that they "cannot know". Each animal has it's own subjective experience, as humans do, which we are not privy to ever understanding. Just like I can never know what it's like to be you, and you me. It's what the so called "Hard problem of Consciousness" is all about.
I think we should only assume that they can in fact know these things on some level, rather than assume that they don't. We all evolved from the same thing. In fact animals have been here a hell of a lot longer than humans, so perhaps it's possible they know more than we think.
Just tossing it out there...
TheDualityExperience
reply to post by saneguy
Then how would you explain pets having personalities.
You might be surprised to learn that humans can learn wisdom from animals.
PhotonEffect
reply to post by saneguy
saneguy
Sorry, I wasn't clear. Animals do abstract with their various nervous systems and senses just like humans, however, they cannot know that they do. To know this you need to have science.
How can we possibly know for sure that they "cannot know". Each animal has it's own subjective experience, as humans do, which we are not privy to ever understanding. Just like I can never know what it's like to be you, and you me. It's what the so called "Hard problem of Consciousness" is all about.
I think we should only assume that they can in fact know these things on some level, rather than assume that they don't. We all evolved from the same thing. In fact animals have been here a hell of a lot longer than humans, so perhaps it's possible they know more than we think.
Just tossing it out there...
Actually, if I may- Thought (as a verb) is the action of creating thoughts, ideas, opinions etc (the nouns). We certainly create thoughts. So I will have to disagree with your assessment, simply on the grounds of it being incomplete.
I get what you're trying to say here but I'm not sure the analogy is accomplishing what you want. We may be able to see the results of digestion, the mechanical process, in progress. Ideas and thoughts are the results of thinking, but will never be things we can see, unless we consciously bring them into physical existence in some way. We don't idea an idea. We conjure ideas, and the mind is the "theatre" that allows us to visualize them, and ponder them.
You're logic would seem to suggest that thoughts or ideas don't exist.
This view is too deeply rooted in materialism for my taste. "If we can't see it then it must not exist." Can you see gravity?
I see myself, in my mind. Where do you think the image of yourself in the mirror is being displayed in the first place? Hint: not in your eyes.
Maybe you can expound what it is you mean by "my entire being". It's a very broad concept, perhaps too broad for what we are discussing here. In the physical sense- You don't use your feet to think. Or your small intestine to make a decision. So the term "entire being" would seem to not apply then. And I'm fairly certain you're not talking about the metaphysical aspect of "being"
What are the "faculties and abilities" that allow you to be self-aware? You don't feel the need to limit yourself to the non-physical(?), but you're limiting yourself to the physical.
This seems like another cop out to me. Certainly you have memories of your past, don't you? Certainly they are not blank?
What is your subjective experience of the color red, or the taste of pizza? "Your being"?
To see how we can consider the separation of the information from the actual nervous system itself, think of a book. The book's mass, its temperature, and other physical dimensions can now be considered as roughly akin to the brain. Then think about the information content (i.e., the story the book tells or claims it makes). In the computational theory, that is akin to the mind. The mind then is the information instantiated in and processed by the nervous system.
Photoneffect I think we forget sometimes that we are literally the universe. Made from the very same stuff. And out of this stuff, arose beings like ourselves that have become aware of the universe without and within.
AphorismNot even figuratively are we the universe. If you were the universe, I’d be sitting in a chair responding to your post somewhere inside you. It is a horrific thought.
I would like to understand what leads you to your conclusions though, other than your own musings on the matter.
The Stranger – I suggest that anything has real being that is so constituted as to possess any sort of power either to affect anything else or to be affected, in however a small a degree, by the most insignificant agent, though it be only once. I am proposing as a mark to distinguish real things that they are nothing but power.
- Plato The Sophist