It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Visually Confirmed: Enormous Craft Detected on Moon

page: 5
70
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 01:27 PM
link   
Reminds me of "The lights over Phoenix" vehicle.




posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 01:29 PM
link   

windslayer
reply to post by DeadSeraph
 


Daily Mail and Huffington Post constantly report things based on a single image. The amount of tumblr jokes that get reported as news is astounding.
This particular article cites one person... and this was the ONLY news team on the planet who was able to interview him. Curious...


I second this motion to not be gullible


Even CNN is posting sensational links to links to other links every so often... the latest Bigfoot hoax [by the same guy who did the 2009 bigfoot hoax] comes to mind. More and more the MSM is resorting to tabloid "journalism".

Too bad there isn't a common sense app.



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 02:25 PM
link   
There is also this documentary on youtube called "Aliens come from hell" and supposidly shows alien bases, ships and alien life forms found in the giant ship. The same one that it posted here a few pages back. It's really creepy and worth the watch.

So about 42 minutes in is when I think it get's interesting and starts to discuss the ship.

edit on 1/21/14 by proob4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 02:35 PM
link   

proob4
There is also this documentary on youtube called "Aliens come from hell" and supposidly shows alien bases, ships and alien life forms found in the giant ship. The same one that it posted here a few pages back. It's really creepy and worth the watch.

So about 42 minutes in is when I think it get's interesting and starts to discuss the ship.

edit on 1/21/14 by proob4 because: (no reason given)


That footage has been making the rounds for like 10 years now. I first saw it when it was billed as "Apollo 20".

It's hoaxed.



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 02:43 PM
link   
The google image looks like an artifact. I've seen many on Google Mars. The V shape that was seen in that image of Comet Ison's tail looked a lot like this one. ~$heopleNation



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 02:44 PM
link   
I haven't gone through this whole thread yet but this article does a good job of showing how this is an artifact and nothing more.

debunked image



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 03:02 PM
link   
45 flags? 45 fricking flags? Thanks for wasting my time. The collective "intelligence" of this site amazes me. That's it, I'm done. Bye bye ATS, I cannot continue with this shambles.

Don't worry, I wont let the door hit me on the way out. Ta ta.



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 03:09 PM
link   

DeadSeraph
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


Not buying it. They have no credible sources it would seem, and all they have for images are the grainy artifact pictures from google that have been discussed (and debunked) previously. The only other image they have supposedly showing a craft are completely indiscernible and could be anything or even just drawn in photoshop.

This is supposedly their giant intergalactic space ship:



They are claiming that these giant L shaped ships landed on the moon, yet the picture from google looks nothing like that...

tetris



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 03:22 PM
link   
reply to post by gardener
 


What makes me laugh about all you peeps picking this apart is this is a credible disclosure and you all pick it apart. Something seems like it's going on, stop putting words into the Goves mouth and sit back and watch what happens.



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 03:33 PM
link   
I know they have at least one huge dark starship described to me as an ark, it will be used to house animals for their own survival, the animals will be picked up and placed back on Earth after the asteroids/meteorites/space debris have passed.

believe me or don't believe me, i don't really care.

Love and harmony
Whateva



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 03:41 PM
link   

bigbiy666
reply to post by gardener
 


What makes me laugh about all you peeps picking this apart is this is a credible disclosure and you all pick it apart. Something seems like it's going on, stop putting words into the Goves mouth and sit back and watch what happens.


This story is old. Nothing has happened. It's complete bunk... But go ahead. Keep watching.



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 04:01 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 





The sources. Oh...the sources.

Wish it was true but this has the very specific scents of a hoax.



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 04:01 PM
link   

DeadSeraph

roadgravel
reply to post by DeadSeraph
 




They are claiming that these giant L shaped ships landed on the moon, yet the picture from google looks nothing like that...


I thought the same thing. What was the source of the L shape pic?

They don't specifically say (which seems dubious). There are implications in the article that a "Dr.Eric Norton" provided it, or at least is confirming this story, but subsequent google searches have revealed little about this guy. He has apparently been involved in similar claims with comet ISON and was mentioned in this thread on ATS which was labeled a hoax. The claim is that he is a NASA consultant but I can't find any information that confirms it.

Seems like a steaming pile of BS to me.

Edit to Add:

The only thing I can find linking anyone named Eric Norton with Nasa is on this list . It's a list of attendees to a workshop, but there is no possible way to confirm if that is the same individual or not.


edit on 20-1-2014 by DeadSeraph because: (no reason given)


If you look at the very bottom of the source article it says, "Dr. Norton is a ficticious name utilized to protect the identity of the source" just thought I would point that out for you.



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by gunshooter
 


It's already been pointed out, but thank you. Doesn't make the story any more credible.



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 04:13 PM
link   

DeadSeraph

bigbiy666
reply to post by gardener
 

What makes me laugh about all you peeps picking this apart is this is a credible disclosure and you all pick it apart. Something seems like it's going on, stop putting words into the Goves mouth and sit back and watch what happens.

This story is old. Nothing has happened. It's complete bunk... But go ahead. Keep watching.

Don't you remember last year when the Earth was invaded by aliens and the entire population became slaves to superior alien overlords? I'm sure it was on all the news sites.



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 04:17 PM
link   

ELE115PWD
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


WOW there is deff. something there that is either Man-made or ET made, this structure is NOT a natural formation. Google Moon at: 22 042 38.46N, 142 34 44.52E

Google moon is NOT a primary source of ANY moon survey images. Google didn't take those pictures, someone else did, and they're listed right on google moon. In this case the image data comes from Selene, aka Kaguya. The "structure" is not in the original image data, it is entirely an artifact of google's crappy processing. Just like google sky, google moon contains a ton of artifacts and glitches that are not in the original data. That is why any serious researcher would first check with the primary source of the data, in this case JAXA and Selene, aka Kaguya. It says so right on Google moon where the images came from. Always, ALWAYS check with the raw data. Download the raw image data for those coordinates, the same raw data that was used to create the texture for Google moon in the first place, and overlay that back onto google moon to see if it was really in the image at all or was it just an artifact caused by google's processing. Here's the result:
imageshack.com...
The “perspective” shifts because google moon is projecting the image onto a 3d model of the terrain and rendering it, using the image as a texture. The contrast is also dependent on google's processing when converting the image data, but it's the same image data, just exported differently by google.

I've taken the liberty of converting Selene's raw data for that region into a zipped png file anyone can open and look at:
dropcanvas.com...
As you can see from the above animation, it's just a google processing artifact. What is actually happening is that those pixels were corrupted in google's processing and the otherwise-hidden "surface" of google's virtual moon is leaking through beneath them. Those pixels light up and then disappear as you adjust the time on google moon and the virtual sun "rises and sets" on it. You can see that demonstrated here:
www.metabunk.org...



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 04:23 PM
link   
Remember the thread sometime a go about the moon one night as it was just coming up that some people saw something behind the moon like another object,and some guy was told to come to the Texas observatory because they did not know what is was,maybe there is some truth to the story



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 05:06 PM
link   

SLAYER69
reply to post by carewemust
 


Well the US did just launch a fairly large object into orbit. Who knows what it was really for? It's all Top Secret

A Delta IV Heavy configuration rocket is launched for the National Reconnaissance Office in support of national defense.


And if that comparative crap is what the worlds best space agency launches to intercept two enormous, unknown spacecraft approaching Earth...BANG goes the 'UFO's seen around the world are really advanced secret military vehicles' theory.



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 05:38 PM
link   
"Visually Confirmed" By who exactly? Not NASA!



posted on Jan, 21 2014 @ 05:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Gemwolf
 


Your final conclusion may well be correct, but let's remember, assuming this is actually true (i know...) there will most certainly be many vairiables we are certainly not being made aware of, not least of which is the purpose of these craft.

Many military, LEO's and 'agency people' will immediately recognise and appreciate the merit in slowly and carefully approaching a potentially unstable person in a non-threatening manner...to an unstable person, the sudden appearence of authorities can be rather unsettling to say the least can't it.. so appreciating that, slow and steady is going to be preferable to fast and alarming..you'd agree yes?

Again, for the sake of argument and discussion, and still assuming these craft are actually in our vacinity, it may be taken that those who operate them, may not wish to unduly alarm nor appear threatening to us which would indeed be more the case if the craft arrived with fast and alarming speed and movements.

Not that i'm saying ANY of this report about enormous craft is either accurate or indeed otherwise, because i'm not...i AM saying if i were at the helm of enormous space craft, arriving into a system that was home to a technological and intelligent but altogether skittish, paranoid and by my standards as a controller of a couple of enormous interstellar craft, fairly backwards looking species...i'd approach slowly and in a non-threatening manner too...if my intentions were honourable of course.

If i were in this system to do ill on the other hand...i'd have come in hell for leather, obscured my craft behind a handy planet or moon and unleashed all manner of hell on the inhabited world or worlds from far away...wouldn't you?

Slow is good when sighting enormous space craft entering our little system would be my thinking.



new topics

top topics



 
70
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join