It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Spiramirabilis
reply to post by beezzer
Do you really think this is what this is all about?
That's all people care about - money?
Is that all you care about - your money?
It's about survival - with no hope of thriving
You're not poor beezzer - so, that must mean you did something right
Be glad
Biigs
reply to post by beezzer
Because a man makes more than another man does not mean he has a sudden obligation to help others.
Greed got them where they are can you really even expect them to give it up so easy?
edit on 21-1-2014 by Biigs because: (no reason given)
Wealth redistribution will just mean that different people will be seated at those "85" chairs.
beezzer
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
85 people have half the world's wealth.
When has that ever been different at any time in history?
beezzer
85 people have half the world's wealth.
When has that ever been different at any time in history?
webedoomed
beezzer
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
85 people have half the world's wealth.
When has that ever been different at any time in history?
You've said this more than once.
I challenge you to show me a single time in history when this has been the case.
Gotta call out your BS.
webedoomed
reply to post by beezzer
The onus is on you, Beez.
Don't try to bunni hop out of this one.
In other words, when the writer said there would always be poor people in the land, it was a concession to Israel's likely failure to obey the law requiring them to protect its most vulnerable citizens. Sure enough, that's pretty much how the story plays out in the rest of the Old Testament.
There would always be poor people because the Israelites would not prove as generous as they were meant to be. There would always be poor people because Israel would not cancel everyone's debts like they were supposed to. The statement "you will always have the poor with you" is not an excuse for apathy; it's a condemnation of it.
beezzer
Kingdoms, realms, caliphates, have always controlled the worlds wealth.
The minority has always controlled the majority of the worlds wealth.
Now if you're going to bust my chops on that number being 85, then I must place the Hat of Silliness on you.
webedoomed
beezzer
Kingdoms, realms, caliphates, have always controlled the worlds wealth.
The minority has always controlled the majority of the worlds wealth.
Now if you're going to bust my chops on that number being 85, then I must place the Hat of Silliness on you.
That was a HORRIBLY POOR answer.
If you think at ANY POINT IN HISTORY that 50% of the wealth GLOBALLY was dished out to .000000012% of the population, then you are SEVERELY deluded.
Again, I challenge you to provide an adequate response.
webedoomed
beezzer
Kingdoms, realms, caliphates, have always controlled the worlds wealth.
The minority has always controlled the majority of the worlds wealth.
Now if you're going to bust my chops on that number being 85, then I must place the Hat of Silliness on you.
That was a HORRIBLY POOR answer.
If you think at ANY POINT IN HISTORY that 50% of the wealth GLOBALLY was dished out to .000000012% of the population, then you are SEVERELY deluded.
Again, I challenge you to provide an adequate response.
beezzer
Kingdoms, realms, caliphates, have always controlled the worlds wealth.
The minority has always controlled the majority of the worlds wealth.
Now if you're going to bust my chops on that number being 85, then I must place the Hat of Silliness on you.