It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
lostbook
Check it out, ATS
Obama signed a spending bill yesterday that puts the cancelled Constellation program back on track.
"Constellation would have given NASA two sets of rockets suitable for a wide range of missions, with emergency abort systems and safety measures that the space shuttles never had. These rockets, known as Ares 1 and Ares 5, could have taken astronauts anywhere in our solar system. Constellation offered the quickest route to keep NASA's astronauts flying, and would send them beyond Earth orbit for the first time since 1972."
While I'm excited at this news, I'm also cautious since the Constellation program was cancelled in the first place because it was way to expensive to build and maintain as I remember. While I really do think we need to put a new heavy lift rocket in place, I wonder if Constellation is right for the job. Apparently, Obama thinks it is.
What say you, ATS?
www.nbcnews.com...
shaneslaughta
Well its either that or we keep paying the Russians to be our chauffeur
I keep looking forward to the day anti-gravity propulsion comes into its own.
Then we will truly be able to unlock the secrets that are out there.
Soylent Green Is People
Ares V is a big launch vehicle.
A big "heavy launch" vehicle such as Ares V was required by the Constellation Program to do some of the lofty things Constellation proposed. part of Constellations long-term goals (albeit unfunded goals, even prior to Constellation's cancellation) was for extended exploration of the moon using big heavy hardware (Moon habitats, pressurized Moon Rovers, etc) as a stepping stone to manned exploration of Mars (again, using big heavy hardware, such a a cruise vehicle to Mars would be).
To get these heavy pieces of equipment into space required a large heavy-lift vehicle -- i.e., the Ares V. I suppose smaller heavy lift launch vehicles may work, but that may require more launches, and more construction of the pieces once launched. For example, a cruise vehicle for Mars may require several launched pieces to be assembled in orbit, but a smaller vehicle would require those pieces to be smaller, thus requiring more launches. For example, a bigger dump track can haul more dirt than a small one, so fewer truckloads (fewer truck trips) would be needed to fill a hole.
Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by JadeStar
Jade-Star -- I wrote my post before I saw yours (we must have been composing simultaneously). I know the Ares V had some design issues, but I don't think any of those were insurmountable. For example, the Saturn V had its share of engineering problems during its design and constriction phase, but those problems were overcome.
I agree that the Falcon heavy lift may be a great alternative, but I'm not sure who (spaceX or NASA) has the upper hand in designing a heavy lift launch vehicle.edit on 1/18/2014 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)
JadeStar
But couldn't a Falcon Heavy pretty much fulfill the same role? Mars One is planning to use those. Why not NASA?
JadeStar
I look forward to the day when it is even proven possible.
Soylent Green Is People
JadeStar
But couldn't a Falcon Heavy pretty much fulfill the same role? Mars One is planning to use those. Why not NASA?
Top add to my post above, The proposed Ares V can launch a much heavier payload, both to low earth orbit (LEO) and to trans Lunar injection (TLI).
Falcon Heavy:
Payload to LEO -- 53,000 kg (120,000 lb)
Payload to TLI -- 13,200 kg (29,040 lb)
Payload to GTO -- 21,200 kg (47,000 lb)
Ares V:
Payload to LEO -- 188,000 kg (410,000 lb)
Payload to TLI -- 71,100 kg (157,000 lb)
edit on 1/18/2014 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)
shaneslaughta
JadeStar
I look forward to the day when it is even proven possible.
There was a Canadian inventor who had recorded proof of him levitating things.
Wish i could remember his name.
Not shortly after he tried to show the world. Some super secret origination came in and cleaned out his lab.
Soylent Green Is People
JadeStar
But couldn't a Falcon Heavy pretty much fulfill the same role? Mars One is planning to use those. Why not NASA?
Top add to my post above, The proposed Ares V can launch a much heavier payload, both to low earth orbit (LEO) and to trans Lunar injection (TLI).
Falcon Heavy:
Payload to LEO -- 53,000 kg (120,000 lb)
Payload to TLI -- 13,200 kg (29,040 lb)
Payload to GTO -- 21,200 kg (47,000 lb)
Ares V:
Payload to LEO -- 188,000 kg (410,000 lb)
Payload to TLI -- 71,100 kg (157,000 lb)
edit on 1/18/2014 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)