posted on Jan, 20 2014 @ 06:12 AM
For example a key aspect of American neoconservitism is the idea of aggressively promoting America's international interests this some would argue
manifested itself in what we now call the "Bush doctrine".
That is an opinion not established fact. Using the internet to go back in time and pick out things to brand someone in a preconceived notion in real
time does not make it a fact.
In president Bush's book 'Decision Points' he sets out his agenda for keeping America safe from terrorist attacks as:
Make no distinction between terrorists and the nations that harbor them--and hold both to account."
"Take the fight to the enemy overseas before they can attack us again here at home."
"Confront threats before they fully materialize."
"Advance liberty and hope as an alternative to the enemy's ideology of repression and fear."
Again your preconceived notion of some kind of evil doctrine coming forward from neoconservatives fall flat on it's face with the fact that President
Obama has not only adopted these policies but enhanced each and every one in the extreme.
That is what is racist because it's OK for an African-American president to push a conservative doctrine however when a white president does the very
same thing it's evil and oppressive not counting infringement on any and all liberties.
You didn't answer this in the previous post.
This is a touchy area as you might have noticed and I would never even respond to many here who have fallen completely off the edge and into fanatic
disciple of delusion, however labeling people and grouping them into categories aligned with a murderous agenda is not allowed in America anymore.
There are dozens and dozens of conservative groups in America and they are free to pursue their agenda within the boundaries of the law. Not only is
that their right they also have the right not to be profiled into unfair alignments of evil.