reply to post by network dude
The problem with your side of debunkers of Chemtrails is you assume that all Chemtrail believers don't understand contrails at all or that some of
those lines are in fact actual contrails.
Here's my issue, I've seen two planes in the sky 2 minutes apart on almost identical flight paths, 1 leaves a contrail that stays constant with the
plane of about 1 inch in the sky behind the plane in a constant. It dissipates with the plane never leaving more than the constant 1 inch of vapor
behind the plane. (i understand 1 inch in the sky if a few miles) It does not stay and leave a road behind it like plane 2 does as it passes by. The
2nd plane leaves a vapor trail (chemtrail/contrail) that never dissipates and go for as far as the eye can see. It then will linger and expand
outward to look like cloud cover. Now before you know it your clear blue sky is completely covered by cloud like cover.
Now your side will spout weather conditions and altitude and yada yada, but your side never presents any evidence of what altitudes and what
conditions cause each trail to stay or dissipate. Now I understand 2 mins is a long time, but I would seriously doubt the weather changed so much in
that time that the plane's so called contrail would stay and linger all day from the first plane to the second.
This is the real issue with both of our sides....neither side will do any true research besides what they read of others work. Do you go pull radar
reports and look at altitudes and compare with weather from plane to plane???? NO and neither do I. Your side will pull this document and say look,
the other side will put a patent and say look. It's a never ending cycle.
I know what my eyes see and I have a theory on why they do it and it's nothing like how you like to paint chemtrail believers. My theory has
nothing to do with doom and gloom porn. I would share my theory, but never on a site like this for obvious reasons.
I would also like to point out the change in culture of pictures that are manufactured or digital IE not real. Why go to the trouble of putting these
Chemtrail/Contrail lines in the background. That is the smoking gun IMO. Are they trying to subliminally in-doctrine the next generation to believe
its just cloud cover? I think so given all the propaganda used in the media, wouldn't that be a possibility? Ask your parents about these, do they
remember lines and lines of contrails in the sky??? 90% won't even know what you are even asking. (this is the part where you copy this comment and
reply with the following: more planes nowadays, different fuel, more people. The common answers that always used to allude answers, almost like
politicians dancing around questions.)
For example there is an image from the end credits of the show called "The League" This is one of FX production companies called Chicken Sticks.
It's a digital picture of a dog sitting on a beach with about 15 chemtrails/contrails in the background. Now why when creating a picture on a
computer would you go to the trouble of putting those in to look like clouds or normal everyday skies we see. If you were asked to draw a picture
right now of the sky, would you draw fluffy clouds and open skies, or skies filled with chemtrails/contrail lines?????
If you said the sky with lines, you're lying to yourself.
I don't speak for everyone, but in my own personal experiences Chemtrails seem very real to me. Can I prove it, no I can't and I won't try to sway
your opinion like the debunkers do. I keep an open mind. I just find it very comical that out of all the topics on this site, the same people are so
adamant about getting the people that say chemtrails are real to change their minds by belittling them and much worse. Imagine if it was like that
for all topics.
I also can't prove that God/Jesus/Buddha/Moral Truth/Logical Truth/Historical Truth/Aliens/Karma/Fate/Bigfoot/Ghosts/our mere existence as fact/ i
think you get the point. But i sure as hell don't constantly create or comment on every thread about these topics like I'm an expert and my opinion
is fact and should be taken to heart. Personal experiences will always go beyond what some people can comprehend and prove as truth. The white house
could come out and say Aliens exist tomorrow and yet still 20% of people would think it was a lie or cover up of something else, its almost
impossible to prove anything to everyone.
When you can admit that just because you haven't seen any evidence that you personally deem worthy thus far doesn't necessarily mean it isn't
happening or new evidence won't come to light. To just close the doors is not only feeble minded but also unscientific which the debunkers use
nonstop in their arguments.