Something (Curiosity Rover) has moved on Mars!

AthlonSavage
reply to post by Arken

 

Nasa lies we all know that and?

Yet, this thread is a hoax.

Oh who to believe!

Hey. Quick question...

I'm sure it is in the Terms & Conditions somewhere, but I can't get motivated to look for myself. What're the regs for declaring something a "Hoax?" I mean, to me, a hoax is a willful misleading. In the case of this thread, I doubt Arken seriously tried to willfully mislead anyone... I mean have you seen some of the rocks he thinks are "evidence" of past/current life on Mars?! I can believe he honestly believed what he was posting...

35Foxtrot
Hey. Quick question...

I'm sure it is in the Terms & Conditions somewhere, but I can't get motivated to look for myself. What're the regs for declaring something a "Hoax?" I mean, to me, a hoax is a willful misleading. In the case of this thread, I doubt Arken seriously tried to willfully mislead anyone... I mean have you seen some of the rocks he thinks are "evidence" of past/current life on Mars?! I can believe he honestly believed what he was posting...

I agree

Hoaxing and plain stupidity are 2 completely different things

(Sorry Arken!)

35Foxtrot
Hey. Quick question...

I'm sure it is in the Terms & Conditions somewhere, but I can't get motivated to look for myself. What're the regs for declaring something a "Hoax?" I mean, to me, a hoax is a willful misleading. In the case of this thread, I doubt Arken seriously tried to willfully mislead anyone... I mean have you seen some of the rocks he thinks are "evidence" of past/current life on Mars?! I can believe he honestly believed what he was posting...

Perhaps the Mods are trying to motivate Arken to exercise more critical thinking before he posts.

DJW001

35Foxtrot
Hey. Quick question...

I'm sure it is in the Terms & Conditions somewhere, but I can't get motivated to look for myself. What're the regs for declaring something a "Hoax?" I mean, to me, a hoax is a willful misleading. In the case of this thread, I doubt Arken seriously tried to willfully mislead anyone... I mean have you seen some of the rocks he thinks are "evidence" of past/current life on Mars?! I can believe he honestly believed what he was posting...

Perhaps the Mods are trying to motivate Arken to exercise more critical thinking before he posts.

If so, that's cool I guess. But to me, rules is rules. If they did want to do as you suggest, a PM might be better?

reply to post by 35Foxtrot


Arken regularly posts pictures of rocks claiming them to be other things. At this point I'd be happy if all his posts got hoaxed.

DJW001

35Foxtrot
Hey. Quick question...

I'm sure it is in the Terms & Conditions somewhere, but I can't get motivated to look for myself. What're the regs for declaring something a "Hoax?" I mean, to me, a hoax is a willful misleading. In the case of this thread, I doubt Arken seriously tried to willfully mislead anyone... I mean have you seen some of the rocks he thinks are "evidence" of past/current life on Mars?! I can believe he honestly believed what he was posting...

Perhaps the Mods are trying to motivate Arken to exercise more critical thinking before he posts.

I take this advice in full consideration.
Thanks.