It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
LadyGreenEyes
reply to post by gardener
I knew from day ONE they were lying. I still suspect, and have stated this elsewhere, that this attack was planned from our side. Anyone who has read many of my posts knows I don't say such things normally, even about very controversial cases such as the 9/11 attacks. My gut feeling, though, was that the ambassador was taken out of the picture for some reason. That's the only thing that would explain WHY they have lied, from the start, about the whole incident.
Aazadan
No question they're lying, so the next logical step is why?
o0oTOPCATo0o
My guess has always been that pretty flower they are so good at growing over there.
Our Gov't depends on it
o0oTOPCATo0o
Attention Everyone:
Stop falling victim to the divide and conquer technique. Democrats and Republicans (especially in higher power) in government, are two cheeks of the same ass.
The more we keep fighting about whether it was the left or right hand that hit us, the more we get hit.
Why do you think major media outlets are in blind support of one party or the other, spewing out mostly B.S.?
It's because the ignorant masses will regurgitate it (grapevine style, so the incorrect info the got is even more distorted) and argue with their fellow man over issues that they have no control of. While we argue over these things, both parties work in collusion, passing detrimental bills that most Americans never hear about.
GW and Barry O are both scumbags.
Whatever was (is) going on in Benghazi would have been going on if it were a D or an R in office.
Arguing about who did what and who would have done what is meaningless. Not to mention it is exactly what is expected of you.
I just hope these survivors have a good hiding spot.
LadyGreenEyes
reply to post by Aazadan
I think the ambassador either knew something they didn't want revealed, or that he stood in the way of some nasty plan to supply even more of our enemies with weapons and other aid. Clearly, I agree, they had inside information, to even know where this place was. The refusal to allow teams to go to their aid is another indicator that they wanted him dead. The extreme degree of the cover-up efforts shows that this came from VERY high up. There is only one conclusion that makes sense in that case, isn't there? As far as the "sleeping through" the incident, I suspect that someone watched it all live, via drone and other means. Watching the expressions when said individual discussed the incident, it seems clear that the response was not one of distress, or horror, or anything you would expect. Doesn't surprise me, though.
Stop falling victim to the divide and conquer technique. Democrats and Republicans (especially in higher power) in government, are two cheeks of the same ass.
eNaR
reply to post by gardener
It doesn't matter if a Democrat or Republic President sits in the White House. Both are mere puppets of the true power that be. Who that is we'll never really know.
Time for a sedative
JiggyPotamus
I've even heard people say that Obama was to blame because he extended the Patriot Act, yet they don't get mad at the president who actually initiated it in the first place. That makes zero sense. So for those who would criticize Obama, while not doing the same to Bush, you are a political hypocrite, to put it bluntly. You are basing your assessments on personal political bias. But for those who would criticize all wrongdoing, no matter if it toward a democrat or republican, by all means, continue. That is fair and balanced. But so many do not wish to operate in a fair and just manner.
Aazadan
I'm not so sure the ambassador was a target, if they wanted him dead specifically there are more covert, less flashy ways to kill him. Just look at all the whistleblowers that "suicide". I hear two in the back of the head is a rather popular way to go these days. More than likely the ambassador was just collateral damage.
This means it's extremely damaging and something the executive branch can't let the legislative branch know about. The lack of national security means they can't even admit that something was there and it's secret.
Yeah he lied about what he would do about issues like the PA, personal freedoms and privacy. Take a walk. You probably voted for him. Accept responsibility for it.
JiggyPotamus
While I agree that the government lied about what occurred during the attacks, something needs to be straightened out. You cannot blame Obama for everything, like these sorts of lies were coined by him. Multiple presidents, including Bush, the previous president, told MAJOR lies while in office, yet Obama is catching more flak than anyone before him. In fact, didn't Bush's lies get us embroiled in a war that has cost thousands of American lives, not to mention trillions of dollars? But Obama is so much worse when it comes to transparency and illegal actions.
I've even heard people say that Obama was to blame because he extended the Patriot Act, yet they don't get mad at the president who actually initiated it in the first place. That makes zero sense. So for those who would criticize Obama, while not doing the same to Bush, you are a political hypocrite, to put it bluntly. You are basing your assessments on personal political bias. But for those who would criticize all wrongdoing, no matter if it toward a democrat or republican, by all means, continue. That is fair and balanced. But so many do not wish to operate in a fair and just manner.
Bilk22
Yeah he lied about what he would do about issues like the PA, personal freedoms and privacy. Take a walk. You probably voted for him. Accept responsibility for it.
Aazadan
This means it's extremely damaging and something the executive branch can't let the legislative branch know about. The lack of national security means they can't even admit that something was there and it's secret.
Quoting myself here because something just hit me about the seriousness of this statement. The lack of national security means there's no record for an FOIA or similar request. They would only do this if the implications could cause a serious national revolt. There's still going to be a paper trail, but rather than say you can't see it, they've hidden it among billions of other documents so that it's unlikely to ever be found.
The only other instance I'm aware of this tactic ever being used is with certain UFO cases. I'm not saying it's alien or black project related infact I'm pretty sure it isn't (particularly for the alien angel), but if the only other time this tactic gets used is to hide something worthy of world wide national defense issues, it stands to reason there was something absolutely huge going down in Benghazi.
This is on the order of smuggling/selling WMD's huge. Maybe it's something else, but I don't know what else could warrant these measures.
xuenchen
eNaR
reply to post by gardener
It doesn't matter if a Democrat or Republic President sits in the White House. Both are mere puppets of the true power that be. Who that is we'll never really know.
Time for a sedative
And,
"TPTB" are who?