It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The U.S. economy added 74,000 jobs in December, as the unemployment rate fell to 6.7 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.
The Associated Press reports:
U.S. employers added a scant 74,000 jobs in December, the fewest in three years. The disappointing gain ends 2013 on a weak note and could raise questions about the economy's recent strength.
The Labor Department says the unemployment rate fell from 7 percent in November to 6.7 percent, the lowest level since October 2008. But the drop occurred mostly because more Americans stopped looking for jobs. The government counts people as unemployed only if they are actively searching for work.
The economy added only 74,000 non-farm jobs in December, the fewest in three years. Yet the unemployment rate dropped 0.3 points to 6.7 percent -- the first time in 60 months it has dropped below 7 percent, the Labor Department announced on Friday.
With so few jobs added, the jobless rate still went down because people stopped looking for work.
Hiring Slows in December; Only 74,000 Jobs Added, Fewest in 3 Years
Xcathdra
I love how the administration touts lower unemployment numbers while ignoring the fact people have given up on looking for a job.
paraphi
Xcathdra
I love how the administration touts lower unemployment numbers while ignoring the fact people have given up on looking for a job.
A small point, but if you have "given up" looking for work then you are not unemployed. I suppose if you want to count people not looking for employment as unemployed, then you need to chuck in all sorts e.g. retired, idle rich (and poor) and so on.
Regards
paraphi
Xcathdra
I love how the administration touts lower unemployment numbers while ignoring the fact people have given up on looking for a job.
A small point, but if you have "given up" looking for work then you are not unemployed. I suppose if you want to count people not looking for employment as unemployed, then you need to chuck in all sorts e.g. retired, idle rich (and poor) and so on.
Regards
kaylaluv
Exactly. You would have to count people like me, who quit work in order to be a stay-at-home mom. I don't consider myself "unemployed". I also know a couple of men who became "stay-at-home dads" as well - intentionally.
The Labor Department says the unemployment rate fell from 7 percent in November to 6.7 percent, the lowest level since October 2008. But the drop occurred mostly because more Americans stopped looking for jobs. The government counts people as unemployed only if they are actively searching for work.
paraphi
Xcathdra
I love how the administration touts lower unemployment numbers while ignoring the fact people have given up on looking for a job.
A small point, but if you have "given up" looking for work then you are not unemployed. I suppose if you want to count people not looking for employment as unemployed, then you need to chuck in all sorts e.g. retired, idle rich (and poor) and so on.
Regards
1994 revisions
As a result of research that started in 1986, a complete overhaul of how the CPS was administered and what type of questions were asked occurred.[10] Prior to 1994, the alternate measures of unemployment had different names because the BLS drastically revised the questions in the CPS and renamed the measures: U3 and U4 were eliminated; the official rate U5 remained the same measure but was renamed U3; U6 and U7 were revised and renamed U5 and U6.
Current Population Survey
but if you have "given up" looking for work then you are not unemployed.
Source: U.S. changes how it measures long-term unemployment
So many Americans have been jobless for so long that the government is changing how it records long-term unemployment.
Citing what it calls "an unprecedented rise" in long-term unemployment, the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), beginning Saturday, will raise from two years to five years the upper limit on how long someone can be listed as having been jobless.
The move could help economists better measure the severity of the nation's prolonged economic downturn.
ENrgLee
In other news.... the ministry of plenty is delighted to announce that monthly chocolate rations have been increased from 12 ounces, to 10 ounces.edit on E5Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:16:31 -060030America/ChicagoAmerica/Chicago by ENrgLee because: combatting orwellian newspeak
The "New Normal".
The new "Normal" is high unemployment.
The new "Normal" is millions on food stamps.
The new "Normal" is millions on government aid.
The new "Normal" is redistributed wealth.
The new "Normal" is no more White House tours.
The new "Normal" is one set of rules for you and I, another set for "them".
The new "Normal" is NSA spying on you.
The new "Normal" is drones flying in American skies.
The new "Normal" is indiscriminate attacks on American citizens without due process.
The new "Normal" is gun control.
The new "Normal" is "Free Speech Zones".
The new "Normal" is treaties with our enemies and attacks against our allies.
The new Normal" is nanny care government.
The new "Normal" is victimhood.
The new "Normal" is being afraid all the time.
The new "Normal" is the government feeding that fear.
The new "Normal" is a divided country.
The new "Normal" is us fighting amongst ourselves.
The new "Normal" is blaming others for your own faults, and getting away with it.
The new "Normal" is reality shows on tv and no reality in the news.
The new "Normal" is ignoring the constituents and listening to the lobbyists.
The new "Normal" is crying over one death and ignoring the deaths of thousands.
The new "Normal" is the decay of the Constitution and the birth of See Something, Say Something.
The new "Normal" is the justification of hate, and the embrace of discord, and calling it "Justice".
The new "Normal" is calling whistleblowers traitors, and traitors, patriots.
The new "Normal".
Embrace the madness.