It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
crazyewok
JadeStar
We're still pioneers. It's just that the frontiers are above and below us (the oceans) now.
Im just worried you will try and take your guns
Jokeing by the way.
JadeStar
Actually now that you mention it, we don't know what's out there.... forearmed is forewarned
Joking of course. I'm not a huge gun proponent. I don't even own one and felt safer in the countries I've been in without them.
crazyewok
JadeStar
Actually now that you mention it, we don't know what's out there.... forearmed is forewarned
Joking of course. I'm not a huge gun proponent. I don't even own one and felt safer in the countries I've been in without them.
No thats a point, the Soyuz does have a gun on board after its early crash landing in siberia.
Dunno if there are any man eating rocks on mars but you never know
boohoo
I just read more about the project there is NO WAY this trip going to happen under this format or business plan. I know quite a few people here have dismissed my concerns with the projects fund raising methodology, but have any of you READ how Bas Lansdorp plans to pay for the projects estimated $6 Billion cost? They will NEVER have enough money to do that even if the project design and plans are sound.
First off like I said, he plans to pay for it with a Reality TV business model. OK, did anyone here notice that the projected time to properly train these astronauts is 8-10 YEARS? Yes, I agree that is what could be necessary time wise, BUT again, how do you get 8-10 years of consistent TV viewer numbers and demand for advertisement slots from companies? They won't be leaving for Mars until 8-10 years later! There will NEVER be enough prolonged viewer demand/numbers in conjunction advertisement slot being bought to support this trip to Mars, let alone the development of an actual working project. NO WAY, NEVER, NOT EVER!
Second, he's found a way to reduce his costs with a sham non-profit. Essentially "Donations" to help "seed" the project go to the non-profit, called Mars One, which includes HIS salary expenses etc, BUT, when the time comes to "sell" the show for TV those profits solely belong to his for-profit company Interplanetary Media Group.
Sound like a good way to get "other peoples money" to pay for Bas Lansdorp's "living" while he gets to "play" scientist/inventor/media mogul while not actually creating anything at the end of the day. Sounds like a good business plan/scam to me, I'm definitely going to start something similar this week! I too would like 8-10 years worth of salary, by simply selling tall tales on someone else's dollar and if it all works out in the end getting residuals reruns for decades. Its nearly as good as being a politician or a Wall Street executive as far as I am concerned.
I'll repeat, unless a Jeff Bezos or Paul Allen type, decides down the road to fund this to the tune of $1 billion start up money, it ain't happening. He uses revenue from the Olympics as an example of how much money the Mars One project will make, but if the Olympics were longer than 3 weeks and took 8-10 years to determine success or failure, no one would be watching past about a dozen reality TV episodes. My American Idol and Avatar revenue examples still stand and are perfectly valid analogs to how much such a TV show would make at BEST.
The competing Inspiration Mars project is FAR more likely to happen. Plus, Dennis Tito is behind it, whom has proven he can get investment partners (BTW, he was the first space tourist to pay out of pocket)
WASHINGTON — When multimillionaire and one-time space tourist Dennis Tito announced Inspiration Mars early this year, it was billed as a nonprofit venture, funded via philanthropy, to send two people on a 501-day Mars flyby mission that would launch in early January 2018. Tito said he planned to fund the mission primarily through donations; he was open to selling some data collected during the mission to NASA, but that was, at that time, the only kind of funding he was seeking from the space agency.
Less than nine months later, Tito and Inspiration Mars have changed course. In a report summary released Nov. 20, timed with testimony given by Tito before a hearing of the House Science Committee’s space subcommittee, Inspiration Mars rolled out an alternative plan that relies on a public-private partnership with NASA.....It would also rely primarily on NASA funding to make the mission possible. This proposal would, in effect, reshape national space policy, with a very short period for Congress and the White House to endorse this approach in order to meet its launch window.
A spokesman for NASA has stated that “Inspiration Mars’s proposed schedule is a significant challenge due to life support systems, space radiation response, habitats and the human psychology of being in a small spacecraft for over 500 days”, but that "we remain open to further collaboration as their proposal and plans for a later mission develop.” John Logsdon, professor emeritus at George Washington University’s Space Policy Institute, has criticised the short time-frame for preparation of the mission, saying that it is "totally implausible" for a mission to be launched in 2017, although the later "Plan B" mission might be possible "if the stars align".
carewemust
You get to Mars, look up at the stars and feel let-down because after all those months of travel, you really didn't go very far. The stars and constellations will look pretty much the same, albeit brighter.
I'd much rather give my life attempting something far more grander, like Jodie Foster did in that movie (can't remember the name) where she transcended normal space/time. Perhaps death will be like that. We can only hope.
cwm
boohoo
I just read more about the project there is NO WAY this trip going to happen under this format or business plan. I know quite a few people here have dismissed my concerns with the projects fund raising methodology, but have any of you READ how Bas Lansdorp plans to pay for the projects estimated $6 Billion cost? Sure he will be able to pay HIS salary and living expenses DURING the whole process of creating this sham, but that doesn't mean anyone is actually leaving for Mars at the end of the day. They will NEVER have enough money to do that even if the project design and plans are sound.
First off like I said, he plans to pay for it with a Reality TV business model. OK, did anyone here notice that the projected time to properly train these astronauts is 8-10 YEARS? Yes, I agree that is what could be necessary time wise, BUT again, how do you get 8-10 years of consistent TV viewer numbers and demand for advertisement slots from companies? They won't be leaving for Mars until 8-10 years later! There will NEVER be enough prolonged viewer demand/numbers in conjunction advertisement slot being bought to support this trip to Mars, let alone the development of an actual working project. NO WAY, NEVER, NOT EVER!
Second, he's found a way to reduce his costs with a sham non-profit. Essentially "Donations" to help "seed" the project go to the non-profit, called Mars One, which includes HIS salary expenses etc, BUT, when the time comes to "sell" the show for TV those profits solely belong to his for-profit company Interplanetary Media Group.
Sound like a good way to get "other peoples money" to pay for Bas Lansdorp's "living" while he gets to "play" scientist/inventor/media mogul while not actually creating anything at the end of the day. Sounds like a good business plan/scam to me, I'm definitely going to start something similar this week! I too would like 8-10 years worth of salary, by simply selling tall tales on someone else's dollar and if it all works out in the end getting residuals reruns for decades. Its nearly as good as being a politician or a Wall Street executive as far as I am concerned.
I'll repeat, unless a Jeff Bezos or Paul Allen type, decides down the road to fund this to the tune of $1 billion start up money, it ain't happening. He uses revenue from the Olympics as an example of how much money the Mars One project will make, but if the Olympics were longer than 3 weeks and took 8-10 years to determine success or failure, no one would be watching past about a dozen reality TV episodes. My American Idol and Avatar revenue examples still stand and are perfectly valid analogs to how much such a TV show would make at BEST.
The competing Inspiration Mars project is FAR more likely to happen. Plus, Dennis Tito is behind it, whom has proven he can get investment partners (BTW, he was the first space tourist to pay out of pocket).edit on 16-1-2014 by boohoo because: (no reason given)
dreamingawake
Wonder if four people is enough starting off on the project. Surely during that time to the planet they would have at least one breakdown, maybe one death. At least more issues, health, death/s later on.
One article, of someone planning to goes, explains it's more than just that trip when they find if they are confirmed to go, it's a whole life change up until then, of course after,
Mother, Kids Hope Dad Won't Leave Them Forever on Mars Mission
doorhandle
Yeah I thought that too, only 4 at the beginning is daft, what if 1 or 2 change their mind the week before? Which is bound to happen, though the family/kiddy reason might not as I don't think they will pick 4 with close family.
This whole thing is ludicrous.
doorhandle
reply to post by JadeStar
No, it is ridiculous. We have barely been to the moon, or even the bottom of our oceans for crying out loud, yet we are trying to send people to Mars? In 10 years! Organising soccer world cup tournaments take longer than that.
Its not the fact they are trying that is confusing me, it is the short time frame..if they said 20 or 30 years, maybe, after a lot of test flights.
doorhandle
reply to post by JadeStar
All valid points and I agree it is visionary. If it was NASA or even China or Russia I could sort of, just, see how they could pull it off. But it isn't it is a private enterprise, NASA has wiped there hands of them...they want nothing to do with it.
Now a private manned venture to Mars, in 10 years is not gonna happen with current technology. Ill bet you $10 it doesn't.
JadeStar
How long has Big Brother (UK) or MTV's Real World been on?
Why would this be much different? It seems much more compelling than either of those shows which have been on longer.
Simply shouting "NEVER EVER!" over and over is not really supporting your position with hard data.
JadeStar
How much money will the FIFA World Cup generate?
How much money would selling commercials during Apollo missions have made if measured in todays dollars? Do you know? I do, and its plenty more than what Mars One would need.
JadeStar
This is not much different than running a Kickstarter campaign to fund a video game design as plenty of gaming companies do.
JadeStar
So you're saying that you somehow know better than Lockheed Martin or that Lockheed did not do due diligence regarding Bas? By the way, from what I can tell he was already fairly well to do before he came up with Mars One.