It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
amfirst1
reply to post by NoRulesAllowed
Capitalistic intervention
robhines
I don't think you have any real idea either, sorry. Socialism is about workers owning the means of production. That isn't being powerless at all, but to the capitalists it means the end of their control, and this is why you have so much propaganda from almost all parts of the world.
...
...When socialists talk about the abolition of private property, they are referring to the socialization of the means of production—the resources and equipment that create wealth. Working people do not own this type of property...
ChuckNasty
reply to post by ENrgLee
That statement you mistook as 'we are living in socialism' was in response to everything socialist is evil.
I live in a Democratic country that has heavy socialistic programs.
Socialism is like Bacon. It makes everything better, but not without consequences. Too much bacon will lead to an early death. Too much socialism will be the death of a country. We cannot live without Bacon, just like we can't live without socialism.
ElectricUniverse
robhines
I don't think you have any real idea either, sorry. Socialism is about workers owning the means of production. That isn't being powerless at all, but to the capitalists it means the end of their control, and this is why you have so much propaganda from almost all parts of the world.
...
Are you kidding me?... I even gave socialist websites which clearly contradict the claim that "the workers own the means of production"... The workers DO NOT OWN the means of production despite CLAIMS to the contrary... That alone tells me you don't know a thing about socialism.
...When socialists talk about the abolition of private property, they are referring to the socialization of the means of production—the resources and equipment that create wealth. Working people do not own this type of property...
www.pslweb.org...
...
The problem with socialists and leftists is that they are completely ignorant of the economic/form of government (socialism) they adore and revere...
edit on 12-1-2014 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)
This myth confuses private property with personal property. When socialists talk about the abolition of private property, they are referring to the socialization of the means of production—the resources and equipment that create wealth. Working people do not own this type of property—which is why we have to work to survive.
Right now, the wealth of the 1,000 billionaires is equal to that of the 3.5 billion poorest people on the planet. In order to provide everyone with more, that wealth must be commonly owned, and not the property of those few capitalists.
Socialists have no interest in taking away one’s home, car or individual items intended for personal use. In reality, as the foreclosure crisis has shown, under capitalism the banks own most of this property as well—and will take it away as they please.
Based on the experiences of the 1848 revolutions, Marx and Engels came to the conclusion that the only way to end exploitation of the poor and oppressed is for the working class to take control of the means of production through a working class revolution. Only smashing the capitalist state and replacing it with a new workers’ state can lay the foundation for socialism.
NullVoid
reply to post by raymundoko
It CAN work with democratic selection of leaders. Comparing to democratic + capitalist, democratic + socialist is more preferable in the long term. Common capitalist (democratic + capitalist) like practiced worldwide, will favor the "entrepreneur"/corporate/1% what ever you call them, its the norm and expected. Easy said - leaders are bought instead of elected. A simple check, you go run for president, yep, thats right, and bingo, first thing coming to mind - where do I get the funds to get started and you will start looking at big corporate. Sign a few documents allowing them to do what they want, you get millions to boot.
Comparing to socialist democratic, you need plenty of saliva and microphone and talk your way up, people will support you with everything (sacrifice), they will fight for the cause with you as leader, the world call this - "revolution", but as a species, this is the correct way.
Full Definition of SOCIALISM
1
: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2
a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3
: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
NullVoid
Again, I slap my forehead. Looks like people really hate communism/socialism that much that they did not bother to understand how it work in the first place.
Oh well, what can I say, its not a popular choice
I wonder if they know the root word for communist.edit on 12-1-2014 by NullVoid because: (no reason given)
The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.[/size=4]4
KARL MARX, The Communist Manifesto
...
But it may be asked how Individualism, which is now more or less dependent on the existence of private property for its development, will benefit by the abolition of such private property.[/size=4]
...
Democracy + true free market capitalism is the best system that gives the most to the most people with the most freedom. You might have to work but at least it will not eventually implode like democratic socialism.