It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
AndyMayhew
reply to post by guohua
I sometimes forget that not everyone monitors world weather stories.
Check out my blog - it's non biased. I report all the weather stories I find, hot or cold (though I'm sure I miss many) Obviously, for the purpose of this thread, only current stories and reports are relevant. Were those picture taken this week?
edit on 6-1-2014 by AndyMayhew because: (no reason given)
The AGW deniers have stretched truth to its limits and now almost entirely rely on self-deception.
Climate change skeptics are pointing to the record cold weather as evidence that the globe isn't warming. But it could be that melting Arctic ice is making sudden cold snaps more likely—not less
That disruption to the polar vortex may have been triggered by a sudden stratospheric warming event, a phenomenon Rick Grow explained at the Washington Post a few days ago:
Large atmospheric waves move upward from the troposphere — where most weather occurs — into the stratosphere, which is the layer of air above the troposphere. These waves, which are called Rossby waves, transport energy and momentum from the troposphere to the stratosphere. This energy and momentum transfer generates a circulation in the stratosphere, which features sinking air in the polar latitudes and rising air in the lowest latitudes. As air sinks, it warms. If the stratospheric air warms rapidly in the Arctic, it will throw the circulation off balance. This can cause a major disruption to the polar vortex, stretching it and — sometimes — splitting it apart.
What does that have to do with climate change? Sea ice is vanishing from the Arctic thanks to climate change, which leaves behind dark open ocean water, which absorbs more of the heat from the sun than reflective ice. That in turn is helping to cause the Arctic to warm faster than the rest of the planet, almost twice the global average. The jet stream—the belt of fast-flowing, westerly winds that essentially serves as the boundary between cold northern air and warmer southern air—is driven by temperature difference between the northerly latitudes and the tropical ones.
Snow and ice are disappearing from the Arctic region at unprecedented rates, leaving behind relatively warmer open water, which is much less reflective to incoming sunlight than ice. That, among other factors, is causing the northern polar region of our planet to warm at a faster rate than the rest of the northern hemisphere. (And, just to state the obvious, global warming describes a global trend toward warmer temperatures, which doesn’t preclude occasional cold-weather extremes.)
jonnywhite
The AGW deniers have stretched truth to its limits and now almost entirely rely on self-deception. And so just as the AGW deniers hold frantically onto the ledge, hanging over the dank precipice, afraid of the death below them, a hand reaches down to rescue them, and realizing their plight, do they grab onto it? It's the hand of science. It's not the hand they wanted, it's the one they ran from, but it was the only one there when they faced their last moments of life. And so this is their destiny: to reach for the hand unwanted or die in one last attempt to escape it.
Maybe the greater truth is we all face something similar in life.edit on 6-1-2014 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)
jonnywhite
The AGW deniers have stretched truth to its limits and now almost entirely rely on self-deception. And so just as the AGW deniers hold frantically onto the ledge, hanging over the dank precipice, afraid of the death below them, a hand reaches down to rescue them, and realizing their plight, do they grab onto it? It's the hand of science. It's not the hand they wanted, it's the one they ran from, but it was the only one there when they faced their last moments of life. And so this is their destiny: to reach for the hand unwanted or die in one last attempt to escape it.
Maybe the greater truth is we all run from something just like them.edit on 6-1-2014 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)
And that is my function here in focusing on the publication this week of Climate Change Reconsidered II, authored by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), and published by the Heartland Institute.
“is an international panel of scientists and scholars who came together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change. NIPCC has no formal attachment to or sponsorship from any government or governmental agency. It is wholly independent of political pressures or influences and therefore is not predisposed to produce politically motivated conclusions or policy recommendations. NIPCC seeks to objectively analyze and interpret data and facts without conforming to any specific agenda. This organizational structure and purpose stand in contrast to those of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is government-sponsored, politically motivated, and predisposed to believing that climate change is a problem in need of a U.N. solution.”
I can attest to you that the team of 50 scientists producing the 1,200 pages of calm, reasoned, dispassionate science in the report did achieve their goal of objectively analyzing and interpreting data and facts without conforming to any specific agenda. They carefully demonstrate the inconvenient facts about the world’s climate discussed below, and when you have that any politicization would just detract from the presentation, as Al Gore shows in his global warming political harangues.
That is in sharp contrast to President Obama’s own EPA, which issued its “endangerment finding” legally authorizing regulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, without submitting the finding to its own peer review board established by federal law precisely for that purpose. What were they so afraid of if 97% of scientists supposedly agree with them? That violation of federal law has now been challenged in court, and is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. But this would not be the first time that the Administration of this lawless President has openly flouted the law.
The authors of the report do not deny that there is some effect of warming the planet from mankind’s emissions of CO2, primarily from use of traditional carbon fuels such as oil, coal, and natural gas. The argument is over how big of an effect that is, how that compares to natural causes of climate change, and whether the human caused effect threatens a catastrophe, or even severe distress, to human civilization and the environment. The conclusion of the report is that the U.N.’s IPCC has exaggerated the amount of global warming likely to occur due to mankind’s emissions of CO2, and the warming that human civilization will cause as a result “is likely to be modest and cause no net harm to the global environment or to human well-being.”
Get this next part of the article and I'll attach and link.
The fundamentals of the argument is that CO2 is not some toxic industrial gas, but a natural, trace gas constituting just 0.038% of the atmosphere. For readers disadvantaged by excessive exposure to the party propaganda organ called the New York Times, that is less than 4/100ths of one percent. The report states, “At the current level of 400 parts per million, we still live in a CO2-starved world. Atmospheric levels (of CO2) 15 times greater existed during the pre-Cambrian period (about 550 million years ago) without known adverse effects,” such as catastrophic global warming.
Your Move Global Warmist!
Obama, you read THAT! CO2 Starved World, so where did your people get those numbers you won't share,,,, from Uncle Gore? LIER!
edit on 6-1-2014 by guohua because: (no reason given)edit on 6-1-2014 by guohua because: (no reason given)
neo96
reply to post by bobs_uruncle
The global warming fraud has been exposed for what it is.
Mankind has been around for a blink of an eye, our technology, and knowledge even less.
The Earth has been around for billions of years.
Survived meteors,super volcanoes, and everything else the universe has thrown at it.
Someone really needs to explain to me how laws in one country among hundreds is ever going to change a anything.
Those of us who are paying attention see the globing warming farce for what it is:
A neocons wet dream of world domination.
marg6043
reply to post by bobs_uruncle
Yes we will adapt, just like species before us either adapted to the last ice age and survived or got extinct in the process.
Sadly we humans are the newest species to habit the earth and we also very crafty and arrogant enough to think we can change what nature does.
And as usual is those that find a way to profit from scaremongering and that is what makes me angry.
Still when it comes to earth we humans are only a species nothing special and when one species goes extinct another will take its place.
mwood
reply to post by bobs_uruncle
It doesn't matter what he said or did......or how time has proven them wrong. Global warming people will continue to follow the trend just as Obama's supporters continue to follow him after all that's happened.
What does the man say..... Ya can't fix stupid?
burntheships
reply to post by bobs_uruncle
After 17 years of failed predictions from Al Gore,
I think it is time for him to take his place in the long
line of false prophets.
He reminds me so of the fake televangelists,
"give us your money" while he has a huge
carbon footprint; it would be funny if it
was not so pathetic.
edit on 6-1-2014 by burntheships because: (no reason given)
mwood
reply to post by bobs_uruncle
It doesn't matter what he said or did......or how time has proven them wrong. Global warming people will continue to follow the trend just as Obama's supporters continue to follow him after all that's happened.
What does the man say..... Ya can't fix stupid?
Seems like in the '90s, El Niño just didn't want to go away. El Niño, an unusual rise in sea-surface temperatures in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, visited three times from 1990 to 1995. In between, temperatures never went quite back to normal, as if it were all one long El Niño. This has led to some intriguing but speculative discussion about the possible link between rising global temperatures and the apparent increase in El Niños.
How so ?
How do American laws effect the entire globe ?
The only thing the global warming advocates are doing is making things more expensive, and shipping jobs offshore.